Apple will frame iPhone 15 USB-C switch as a consumer win
Apple's introduction of the iPhone 15 generation with USB-C will be framed as a win for consumers at launch, a leaker claims, with Apple keen to present itself as being in a position of strength rather than being forced into making the change.
from Lightning to USB-C will be a major event for the iPhone history books, with numerous leaks indicating the component change is probably going to happen. However, there's still the question of how Apple will frame moving from its own connector design to a more common version.
In Mark Gurman's "Power On" newsletter for Bloomberg on Sunday, it is offered that Apple's announcement of USB-C in the iPhone 15 will be proclaimed as good for consumers.
The reasons for the change that Apple could mention includes the use of a single charging cable for iPhone, Mac, and iPad, with iPhones sometimes charging faster under certain circumstances. The compatibility with chargers used by non-Apple hardware is also thought to be a benefit, as well as a data transfer speed bump.
Apple will do this because the company will always talk about changes from a position of strength, Gurman says.
While Apple will cover the benefits of the change, it will almost certainly avoid discussing European rules about a common charger, which is one of the main real reasons for the update.
Read on AppleInsider
Comments
When the EU hands you lemons - you make lemonade.
Why would anyone expect otherwise? Apple has to answer to shareholders who really don’t care about debating technical details and purity as long as the stock price keeps going up and they get their dividends. Some battles are not worth fighting, especially Lightning in 2023.
Long live Lightning and thank you Apple for saving us from the heinousness that was micro-USB.
Honestly, USB-C is a terrible connector for a mobile phone. Unlike lightning, if you break off the connector you're fucked and need the entire thing replaced because the connector is part of the connection whereas with Lighting if you broke off the connector you only needed a new cable and Lightning is a much more ridged connector for daily usage which could be why Apple stuck with it for so long.
Of course Apple will spin it as a win for customers. Apple is an absolute master at marketing and releasing new products to get people hyped to buy them. They tell you why you need it even if you didn't know you did and they're very convincing when they do it for most people. This is what makes Apple a marketing master.
For those saying use the magnetic charger, I want faster charging at times —which necessitates using a USB-C charger and a USB-C to Lightning adapter cable (or adapter on a USB-C double ended cable).
MagSafe for iPhone would used fewer/smaller magnets because the connector, as seen on MacBooks, is much smaller. No surprise. I think that would be a problem with trying to use the phone when connected to power via MagSafe, knocking the connector off when using the phone.
Now, if Apple designed a MagSafe connector like that for MacBooks, without having to have USB-C connectivity, I might be down with that. Slim, right angle, (lbi-directional?) etc.
But they can't. Not if they want to sell in the EU. And while less efficient, I find the current MagSafe for iPhone to be extremely convenient, particularly in the car, or at work, or just about any place I'd need to charge my phone.
Some third party may make an adapter for the iPhone, but I see that as the rare answer in search of a question.
I don't know that USB-C on a phone will be less durable in practice than Lightning connectors. Certainly it is a stronger connector, but will there be a rash of broken USB-C connectors?
That said, I much prefer Lightning over USB-C. Having an adapter or C-Lighting cable is no big deal for me. That an extra cable give some people pause is a personal problem. I was happy when Apple went from the 30-pin Dock connector to Lightning. But USB-C offers me nothing over my use case. So I'll try to hang on to my current phone or its current replacement for as long as I can.
it IS a consumer win.
So, while maybe not maybe not effecting 90% of owners, I’m willing to bet it will be a high percentage. We’ll know how much when people buy aftermarket replacements.
We’re lucky in that I own a couple of each type of USB-C compatible cables (right down to USB-2.0) for testing. But that was no small chunk of change. I’m hoping that the USB-C devices I have primarily for Mac/Linux/Win will largely be compatible. So far that’s been the case for our USB-C iPads.
Still, the point remains; while in the past we’ve updated and adaptered in response to market and technological changes that have a clear benefit — this is the first time we’re doing so due to the dictates of a governmental agency that has muddied value. (Any one know if they forced all device makers to be USB-C compliant, i.e. car makers, cameras, TVs, AV equipment, game consoles, GPS units, and those millions of day-to-day devices still being produced with charge-only micro-USB? I did notice they didn’t force-sunset USB-A cable ends, even though there’s probably an electrical efficiency case to be made there.)
Personally, I think the EU would have been better off looking at improving its larger waste streams and levels of real recycling. You know, innovating and leading by example and all that stuff.
They will squeeze all they can out of any changes and spin things to make sure they control the narrative.
That's fair game and they did the same when they dropped the charger from the box.