iPad Air (2024) review: Not the cheapest, and not the best, but still great

Posted:
in iPad

The new iPad Air's large screen is a great addition at an excellent price point, but overall the line still lacks excitement.

The blue back of the 13-inch M2 iPad Air
13-inch iPad Air (2024) review



Apple released the new iPad Air at a special streamed media event in May, alongside new iPad Pros, a refreshed Magic Keyboard, and the Apple Pencil Pro.

We've been putting both sizes of the iPad Air through the wringer for several weeks to see how it performs as the middle-tier of Apple's now three-layer cake of iPad models.

iPad Air (2024) review - Design



The new iPad Air, like the M1 version, adopted the design ethos that the iPad Pro started in 2018. This time, though, Apple's mid-range tablet comes in two sizes, with effectively the same dimensions as the 2022 iPad Pro.

While this review focuses mainly on the 13-inch version, nearly everything outside of screen size is relevant to both models.

We're also reviewing it in Apple's "blue" colorway. We question the label, though, because in almost all lighting environments, it just looks silver.



We know, colors with lots of saturation are challenging to apply on large surfaces with uniformity and damage resistance. Still, though, we'd like that vibrant red, or an incredibly radioactive-looking yellow on this lineup.

This all said, the last-generation iPad Air was more vivid, and the old blue is still one of our favorites. Users can also choose from a just-as-muted purple alongside Starlight and Space Gray.

Comparing the thickness of the iPad Pro to the iPad Air by looking at the edges
13-inch iPad Air (2024) review - iPad Pro is thinner than iPad Air



Both sizes measure up at .24 inches thick. This is the same as the M1 iPad Air, and about the same as the M2 iPad Pro was.

Because of this, the 13-inch version especially feels great to hold. If you liked the feel of the iPad Pro after the 2018 refresh, you'll like this.

Closeup shot of the sleep wake sensor with Touch ID built in
13-inch iPad Air (2024) review - Touch ID is built into the sleep/wake button on iPad Air



The top is home to the sleep/wake button. It also houses the biometric Touch ID sensor for unlocking the iPad and authorizing purchases.

Flip things over to find the USB-C port it inherited lock, stock, and barrel from its predecessor. More about this in a bit, but that port is still used to connect external media at a small speed hit versus the iPad Pro, using a USB hub, connecting a large display, or plugging in wired headphones.

iPad Air (2024) review - Display



The sixth-generation iPad Air has either a 2360-by-1640 or 2732-by-2048 pixel display, depending on if you purchase the 11 or 13-inch version. Both yield a pixel density of 264 PPI, meeting Apple's threshold for Retina quality.

Closeup of the Dock on iPad Air
13-inch iPad Air (2024) review - iPadOS still needs some love



Even though Apple borrowed the form factor from the old M2 iPad Pro, it didn't bring the Mini LED along for the ride. The iPad Air has an LED-backlit IPS display, regardless of which size you choose.

Apple calls it a Liquid Retina display. It's just a repeat of the Retina display marketing, with "liquid" added for good measure. Presumably that's because of the rounded corners, because it never called the liquid crystal MacBook Pro a Liquid Retina display.

The new displays are brighter than before, going up to 600 nits (500 nits on the 11-inch), and support True Tone, Night Shift, and the P3 wide color gamut. In practicality, you can't see the extra brightness, unless the new and old models are side-by-side.

Showing off the LCD display with an HDR photo
13-inch iPad Air (2024) review - The LCD looks great, but but not OLED-great



The display looks sharp, bright, and vivid, even if it doesn't boast the same black levels or contrast ratios as those new OLED iPad Pros. For nearly every user who wants a little more than the entry-level 10th generation iPad or replacing an older iPad, it will still look fantastic and be more than good enough.

Another thing it lacks, though that has been a bit more divisive in Internet chatter, is ProMotion. This is Apple's adaptive refresh rate technology that can dynamically ramp up the refresh rate up to 120Hz as necessary.

ProMotion is found on Apple's "pro" products such as iPad Pro, MacBook Pro, and the pro iPhones. As you may expect as it lacks "Pro" in the name, the iPad Air has a fixed 60Hz.

We've said it before but will repeat it again here -- your average user does not care about refresh rate. 60Hz is fine for most.

And if you do care about it, get an iPad Pro.

Demoing the slower refresh with a side by side freeze frame of using Apple Pencil Pro
13-inch iPad Air (2024) review - Comparing the iPad Pro (left) to the iPad Air (right) when using Apple Pencil Pro



It's noticeable to the trained eye when using an Apple Pencil. In some situations, you can see the image the pencil lays down lagging behind the tip.

This isn't in all apps, and it isn't in all situations. And, it's still only dramatically noticeable when you have a ProMotion iPad next to one that isn't.

This isn't a deal-breaker. If you're buying an iPad Air, you know what you're getting.

iPad Air (2024) review - Audio and video



Gracing both the top and bottom -- when held in portrait -- are four grilles backed by stereo speakers.

Speakers on the iPad Air
13-inch iPad Air (2024) review - Four grilles, only two speakers



The 13-inch iPad Air does have the benefit of extra volume to those speakers, granting more bass, and we can attest it helps. The iPad Pro still sounds better, though.

This time, Apple relocated the front-facing camera, sticking it on the landscape side versus the top portrait side. The idea is more people are using their tablets horizontally, so the camera position needs to be adjusted.

We're still not sure we buy this argument given observation of actual users outside the prosumer ecosystem, but okay. Regardless, it's there now.

Rear-facing camera on iPad Air
13-inch iPad Air (2024) review - The 12MP rear camera



On the back is the same solitary 12MP shooter we've had before. It isn't particularly remarkable, but it is sufficient for the quick shot or when using it during a video call.

Photos look fine, but they did before, too. It doesn't seem that the ISP in the M2 chip did anything to help the image quality.

The same goes for that front-facing camera. It works well enough for FaceTime, but you're not taking any amazing shots with it.

iPad Air (2024) review - New accessories



With the updated iPad Air, you can use Apple's existing Magic Keyboard or your choice of Apple Pencil - Apple Pencil USB-C or Apple Pencil Pro (available on Amazon).

Apple Pencil Pro magnetically connecting to the iPad Air
13-inch iPad Air (2024) review - Apple Pencil Pro is a solid upgrade



Apple Pencil Pro is a delight to use, and the iPad Air is the best way to get the new features on the (relative) cheap. The squeeze gesture is a game changer. The barrel roll feature steals a great deal of cachet from Wacom tablets, and we're glad it's here.

Squeezing Apple Pencil Pro to open the on-screen palette
13-inch iPad Air (2024) review - We love the new squeeze gesture



If you're on the fence between the USB-C version and the Apple Pencil Pro, we'd highly recommend the latter. The magnetic charging and automatic pairing process make it worth it -- not to mention the additional features and Find My support.



Pivoting to Magic Keyboard, though, is something we find particularly irksome. The iPad Air frustratingly only supports the last-generation Magic Keyboard.

Remember at the beginning of the review when we said it was still the same dimensions as the last generation and the old iPad Pros? Accessory support is where that comes into play.

The old Magic Keyboard is what fits the new iPad Air, too.

Comparing trackpad sizes for Magic Keyboards
13-inch iPad Air (2024) review - The old trackpad is much smaller on Magic Keyboard



It would be understandable on its own, but what is so annoying is the new Magic Keyboard is markedly superior yet priced the same.

That means you're paying the same price at full retail price for a notably worse product. The older Magic Keyboard is heavier, less durable, has a smaller trackpad, and lacks functions for an identical fee as the new one.

Don't get us wrong -- we know the new iPad Pros are thinner and have different magnet arrangements, making compatibility difficult. The least Apple could do would be to cut that price by even $50.

That said, it's easy to find the older Magic Keyboard on steep sale, or on the second-hand market. We can't say that about the new Magic Keyboard yet.

iPad Air (2024) review - Performance



Internally, Apple made a few upgrades. It now supports Wi-Fi 6E -- up from Wi-Fi 6 -- and base storage begins at 128GB.

Apple not only used to start the storage at 64GB, but it capped it at 256GB. Now, users can opt for 512GB or 1TB at purchase time. For a sizable fee, of course.

The biggest change, though, is the M2 chip. It's not a wholly new chip, as a variant was found in the 2022 iPad Pros and quite a few Macs.

The M2 has an eight-core design for the CPU, split between four efficiency cores and four performance cores. Apple says it also has 8GB of memory and a 16-core Neural Engine.

Paired with this is a nine-core GPU. Apple blew the marketing at launch on this one, calling it a 10-core. That's been fixed after some drama, but it is a rare mis-step by the company.

Single-core benchmark scores
13-inch iPad Air (2024) review - Single-core Geekbench scores



Spinning up Geekbench 6, we got 2,644 for the single core score, up from 2,327. It also outperformed the 2022 M2 iPad Pro here.

The general rule is an above-average user needs at least a 10% performance gain to see any day-to-day difference. We got that here, but not by a lot. Year-over-year improvements were fine but not groundbreaking.

Multi-core benchmark graph
13-inch iPad Air (2024) review - Multi-core benchmark results



Multi-core testing sees a respectable jump from 8,758 to 9,293, but shy of the 13,684 for the M4 chip.

As we pointed out in our 2024 iPad Pro review, iPadOS holds it back more than anything.

When used for content consumption, this is less important. It still matters, but how much it matters is far more variable than somebody dropping productivity workhorse MacBook Pro money on an iPad Pro, versus MacBook Air money for an iPad Air.

iPad Air 2024 review - everyday use



We've been living with the new 13-inch M2 iPad Air for nearly a month and haven't had any situations when the tablet didn't perform admirably.

It's just a wonderful piece of tech for gaming, reading, and creating to various degrees.

iPad Air logo on the back of the tablet
13-inch iPad Air (2024) review - iPad Air is the best choice for almost everyone



We played some games on iPad Air, going between Bloons TD 6+ which can drop frames on levels greater than 150, and Call of Duty mobile when paired with an external DualSense controller.

There was nothing particularly remarkable about its gaming chops. It's better than before, of course, but not by an incredible amount. Still, it felt comfortable. Load times were minimal and everything just seemed to work.

Consuming content was fine, as it has been for a decade on iPad. We easily multitasked, watching the new episodes of Acolyte in picture-in-picture while reading the ongoings for the day in Apple News and checking in on Twitter with Slide Over.

iPad Air M2 reading Apple News
13-inch iPad Air (2024) review - Loving consuming content on this



Nothing stuttered, the animations were smooth, and the iPad Air didn't miss a beat.

On the content creation front, we cranked out video scripts and AppleInsider articles without difficulty. As you'd expect, email wasn't an issue either.

We also edited some fairly large photos in Affinity Photo we shot on our Nikon Zf. They're decent-sized images when shot in RAW.

As we manipulated the images with multitouch, zoomed in and out, added plenty of layers, and retouched with Apple Pencil Pro, we'd see the app pause momentarily to chew on what it was doing. It never did so for more than a second or two.

And, that USB-C port is still not Thunderbolt or USB4. This won't matter to most, but external drive speeds are hampered by that a bit to less than the 10 gigabits per second that the connector allows.

Again, though, if this is something you know you need, get the iPad Pro.

Overall, you can get the job done on an iPad Air. You may just need to be a hair more patient than you might need to be on an iPad Pro.

Should you buy the new M2 iPad Air?



The biggest update this time isn't some new internal feature, but rather the new size. It's great to see that new 13-inch size at a lower price than the iPad Pro.

If the screen size is the main factor in purchasing over any other factor, we highly recommend the 13-inch iPad Air to folks upgrading from older iPad Pro models still sporting an A-series chip.

With these models, it makes the iPad Air even more appealing while also staying boring. Of course, this is by design.

Closeup on the rear-facing iPad Air camera
13-inch iPad Air (2024) review - We love the new 13-inch size option



The iPad Air line is all about trickling-down the features Apple pioneers with the Pro line.

So much of the iPad Pro is just "nice to have" features. OLED, faster CPU, Face ID, faster USB-C port, and ProMotion are all included with that hugely steeper cost.

The iPad Air doesn't quite measure up to that modern iPad Pro standard, but can boast about not being an entry-level iPad. It's nearly as good as the last-gen Pro at a significantly lower price point.

Your typical iPad buyer isn't a yearly upgrader. Upgrade cycles are about the same as the Mac, meaning four or five years between buys for most.

The iPad Air refresh isn't for annual iPad buyers, as rare as they are. It's for new buyers, converters, or those who maybe haven't bought a tablet in several years.

It's a ladder-rung for those who need a little more than the 10th-generation iPad, but don't need the iPad Pro. And, it's the best value for a large-format iPad, since the original iPad Pro.

iPad Air (2024) review - Pros

  • At least a little bit of color left in the design

  • New 13-inch size that's cheaper than the pros

  • M2 chip improves performance

  • Upgraded to Wi-Fi 6E

  • No longer starts at 64GB of storage

  • Apple Pencil Pro is a great add-on

iPad Air (2024) review - Cons

  • Colors need more vibrancy

  • Won't work with the new Magic Keyboard

  • Despite new M2 chip, largely unchanged

Rating: 4 out of 5



We have to give one score, thanks to the overlords at Google. But, broken up, we give the smaller 2024 iPad Air a 3.5 out of 5, and the larger form factor a 4.5 out of 5.

Apple's iPadOS is still a limit on iPad productivity. This is a major pain point for the iPad Pro. It's less so for the iPad Air.

All told, the iPad Air in 13-inch size delivers a more comfortable media consumption environment, with less pinching and zooming into letter-size media. It has more than enough performance to get an iPad-centric job done, and the screen real estate to do it.

And, it's the best way to get into the Apple Pencil Pro without breaking the bank. That alone may be worth it to get an Air of either size, versus the 10th generation iPad.

Where to buy Apple's M2 iPad Air



The M2 iPad Air is on sale now, with Apple resellers discounting every model in our 11-inch iPad Air 6 Price Guide and 13-inch iPad Air 6 Price Tracker. The guides make it easy to compare prices across popular Apple resellers and even set up notifications for when new price drops launch.

At press time, Apple Authorized Reseller Adorama is discounting the new products by up to $50 in addition to bonus savings on AppleCare. Just use promo code APINSIDER during Step 4 of checkout to unlock the savings.

There are also iPad deals in effect on the 2024 release at Amazon and Best Buy.



Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 9
    ddawson100ddawson100 Posts: 521member
    AppleInsider

    We have to give one score, thanks to the overlords at Google. But, broken up, we give the smaller 2024 iPad Air a 3.5 out of 5, and the larger form factor a 4.5 out of 5.

    Wait, why are you hindered by Google at all here? Also, thanks for the review. Things are definitely starting to blue together so it's good to hear the plus/minus of this specific model and accessory support.
    tophatnosockswatto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 9
    Mike WuertheleMike Wuerthele Posts: 6,893administrator
    AppleInsider

    We have to give one score, thanks to the overlords at Google. But, broken up, we give the smaller 2024 iPad Air a 3.5 out of 5, and the larger form factor a 4.5 out of 5.

    Wait, why are you hindered by Google at all here? Also, thanks for the review. Things are definitely starting to blue together so it's good to hear the plus/minus of this specific model and accessory support.
    In short, Google search penalizes reviews that does not have a single score. It's dumb, and it makes little sense, as there is no way to give a product a single score that encompasses the pros and cons of any product for every reader.
    muthuk_vanalingamnubuswatto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 9
    mike1mike1 Posts: 3,324member
    Why would the rating drop for the smaller model??? You said yourself the only real difference is screen size.
    Also, changing the camera location is a huge improvement. Most cases, including Apple's, allow the most capability in landscape mode. The current position allows for hands-free FaceTime calls and automatic tracking. Much improved.
    williamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 9
    williamlondonwilliamlondon Posts: 1,375member
    Don't forget, "Still unable to toast bread" too.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 9
    thttht Posts: 5,536member
    The iPad Air doesn't quite measure up to that modern iPad Pro standard, but can boast about not being an entry-level iPad. It's nearly as good as the last-gen Pro at a significantly lower price point.

    Your typical iPad buyer isn't a yearly upgrader. Upgrade cycles are about the same as the Mac, meaning four or five years between buys for most. 

    The iPad Air refresh isn't for annual iPad buyers, as rare as they are. It's for new buyers, converters, or those who maybe haven't bought a tablet in several years.

    It's a ladder-rung for those who need a little more than the 10th-generation iPad, but don't need the iPad Pro. And, it's the best value for a large-format iPad, since the original iPad Pro.
    So, it's a good, solid option for consumers who want a device to web browse, which constitutes the vast majority of a consumers usage, entertainment, and little office automation. You can say it in a straightforward manner, not with double negatives or back handed ways.

    I don't get that reviewers think they should be recommending to owners of 1 to 2 year old machines to upgrade. Why is this a thing? Is it an SEO thing? It doesn't matter the device, no reviewer should be recommending to anyone that they should upgrade from their 1 to 2 year old devices. There isn't any good reason whatsoever, all things equal.

    One thing that a reviewer, or if you are asked to proffer an opinion, should do is think about whether they would recommend the $700 M1 MBA and $1000 M2 MBA over the 2024 iPA 11 & 13 models, or is it a better option than a $400 to $1000 Chromebook or Windows machine. That's a pretty tough thing to figure out and is dependent on the user. For certain people, an iPad should be the first thing that is recommended.

    A iPad, or a tablet, is the most mobile large display device on the market. That changes how it is used versus a laptop or a 2-in-1, or a tablet that is heavier than the iPA. For a lot of consumers, that mobility is more valuable than say unlimited multitasking. If the user spend most of their time with their iPad on a desktop, they are either drawing with it, have simpler workflows, and possibly a laptop would be the better option for them.
    williamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 9
    Wesley HilliardWesley Hilliard Posts: 214member, administrator, moderator, editor
    tht said:

    So, it's a good, solid option for consumers who want a device to web browse, which constitutes the vast majority of a consumers usage, entertainment, and little office automation. 

     Why is this a thing? Is it an SEO thing? It doesn't matter the device, no reviewer should be recommending to anyone that they should upgrade from their 1 to 2 year old devices. There isn't any good reason whatsoever, all things equal.

    One thing that a reviewer, or if you are asked to proffer an opinion, should do is think about whether they would recommend the $700 M1 MBA and $1000 M2 MBA over the 2024 iPA 11 & 13 models, or is it a better option than a $400 to $1000 Chromebook or Windows machine. That's a pretty tough thing to figure out and is dependent on the user. For certain people, an iPad should be the first thing that is recommended.

    A iPad, or a tablet, is the most mobile large display device on the market. That changes how it is used versus a laptop or a 2-in-1, or a tablet that is heavier than the iPA. For a lot of consumers, that mobility is more valuable than say unlimited multitasking. If the user spend most of their time with their iPad on a desktop, they are either drawing with it, have simpler workflows, and possibly a laptop would be the better option for them.
    You can say it in a straightforward manner, not with double negatives or back handed ways.

    What?

    I don't get that reviewers think they should be recommending to owners of 1 to 2 year old machines to upgrade.

    We didn't. Read what you quoted again. The review specifically says that iPad owners generally upgrade in four to five year cycles.

    Is it an SEO thing?

    No. That's not how SEO works.

    think about whether they would recommend

    This review is directed at people seeking information on buying an iPad. Why would we recommend a MacBook? You might want a MacBook instead, but people buying iPad Air don't.

    $400 to $1000 Chromebook or Windows machine

    I'm not sure anyone on earth should be buying a Chromebook ever,  or any Windows machine in the $400 range over an iPad. The $329 iPad runs laps around those devices.

    possibly a laptop would be the better option for them.

    Most people that buy iPads own other products. They likely already own the laptop, Mac, etc they needed in the first place. People buying iPad Air generally are buying it as a secondary device that's bigger than an iPhone. Those buying iPad Air as their first non-smartphone computer didn't need a Windows toaster fridge or Chrome browser with keyboard either.

    Buy what you need. But know that not everyone will need what you need.
    muthuk_vanalingamwilliamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 7 of 9

    [...] but overall the line still lacks excitement.

    You're not reviewing a vibrator. It's an iPad.
    williamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 8 of 9
    nubusnubus Posts: 462member

    [...] but overall the line still lacks excitement.

    You're not reviewing a vibrator. It's an iPad.
    Main reason for Apple having dropped from #1 to #3 in market cap is the lack of excitement. There is no growth, no reason for more to join Apple, and no reason to upgrade. The market is aware of the lack of excitement - vibrating or not. Apple is in a position where core tech like AI is being sourced from Microsoft/OpenAI - it is a new low for Team Cook.

    Air M2 is a stale mix of the final M2 chips taken from the lowest bin with the least number of functional cores. Air M2 is likely the last major 5nm product to ship with iPhone 12 (2020) being the first. 2020 desktop tech in a 2024 mid-range premium tablet would make even Samsung ashamed. Add a USB-C connector required by politicians and 13". That is all of the innovation Apple could muster for Air.

    Apple didn't even care enough to make the new keyboard work with Air, there i still no FaceID (this isn't iPad SE), and iPad is still the only range without MagSafe (mac, iPhone, watch, AVP all have MagSafe), and why couldn't it get ProMotion... wouldn't make it OLED. It could have received A17 (Pro) for 3nm efficiency, far more AI power to allow future functionality, and a modern GPU - but no.

    iPad Air M2 is going to deprecate faster than sliced bread.
    williamlondon
  • Reply 9 of 9
    thttht Posts: 5,536member
    tht said:

    So, it's a good, solid option for consumers who want a device to web browse, which constitutes the vast majority of a consumers usage, entertainment, and little office automation. 

     Why is this a thing? Is it an SEO thing? It doesn't matter the device, no reviewer should be recommending to anyone that they should upgrade from their 1 to 2 year old devices. There isn't any good reason whatsoever, all things equal.

    One thing that a reviewer, or if you are asked to proffer an opinion, should do is think about whether they would recommend the $700 M1 MBA and $1000 M2 MBA over the 2024 iPA 11 & 13 models, or is it a better option than a $400 to $1000 Chromebook or Windows machine. That's a pretty tough thing to figure out and is dependent on the user. For certain people, an iPad should be the first thing that is recommended.

    A iPad, or a tablet, is the most mobile large display device on the market. That changes how it is used versus a laptop or a 2-in-1, or a tablet that is heavier than the iPA. For a lot of consumers, that mobility is more valuable than say unlimited multitasking. If the user spend most of their time with their iPad on a desktop, they are either drawing with it, have simpler workflows, and possibly a laptop would be the better option for them.
    | You can say it in a straightforward manner, not with double negatives or back handed ways.

    What?

    | I don't get that reviewers think they should be recommending to owners of 1 to 2 year old machines to upgrade.

    We didn't. Read what you quoted again. The review specifically says that iPad owners generally upgrade in four to five year cycles.

    | Is it an SEO thing?

    No. That's not how SEO works.
    To me, you spent a lot of words to say that the iPad Air is a good midrange iPad device. The price is worth it to buyers who know what they would do with it. It wasn't clear imo that you said that.

    The question or comment about not recommending a new device to owners of 1 or 2 year prior gen devices is a comment about device reviews in general. I read a lot of reviews. Almost to a one, there is a commentary about whether a new device is worth buying for owners of devices that were bought in the last year or two, which should generally be considered preposterous. So, yes, I'm wondering why it needs to be said?


    This review is directed at people seeking information on buying an iPad. Why would we recommend a MacBook? You might want a MacBook instead, but people buying iPad Air don't.

    I suggested it as a thought problem to determine the value of the 2024 iPad Air. As such, I think it necessarily means you have to compare it to other devices. Forgot to include stock clearance sales of the M2 iPad Pro and used versions too, though the prices always are set such that buyers will pay for better features than in the 2024 iPA. A new 2022 iPP11 at $650 would be great value, or a 2022 iPP13 for $900.

     

    williamlondon
Sign In or Register to comment.