Apple is once again advertising on X, more than a year after stopping all ads on the platf...

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in General Discussion

Apple is once again running ads on the social media platform X, after the company previously stopped all advertising on the website due to the presence of objectionable content on it.

Apple Safari advertisement promoting protection against online trackers with Safari icon and shield symbol.
Apple has seemingly resumed advertising on X.



The iPhone maker hasn't marketed its products and services on X, formerly known as Twitter, since November 2023, but all of that seemingly changed on Tuesday. New advertisements have appeared on the website, following a January 2025 report that indicated the company was looking to resume its marketing efforts on X, which turned out to be true.

One of the ads recently posted by Apple promotes the privacy features of the Safari web browser, emphasizing that it helps protect users against online trackers. "A browser that's actually private," the advertisement reads.

Apple's initial decision to pause X advertising was made due to concerns regarding some of the statements and comments made by the platform's CEO, Elon Musk, particularly because he promoted and interacted with an arguably hateful post directed towards the Jewish community in the United States.

Naturally, there was immediate pushback from the platform's users, who quickly turned to alternative websites and apps such as Bluesky, Threads, and Mastodon. It's also why select tech companies, including Apple, ceased all advertising on X. In both instances, the fear was that their content would appear alongside posts with discriminatory, racist, homophobic, or otherwise objectionable content from self-proclaimed Neo-Nazis or alt-right accounts.

Musk's apparent desire for "free speech" meant that the social media platform experienced an increase in right-wing and even discriminatory content ever since he took control. Under Musk's control, users are often able to post overtly sexist, racist, and extremist content, even expressing admiration for figures such as Hitler in some instances due to limited moderation.

The CEO himself has repeatedly made claims of alleged racism towards white people and believes that hordes of illegal immigrants are ruining the United States, among other things, making him a controversial figure at the very least.

In 2023, Apple was able to distance itself from Musk's comments by promptly shutting down all advertising on X. The situation has since changed dramatically, however, as Musk is now in charge of the so-called "Department of Government Efficiency," which operates outside of the federal government but still reports to President Trump.

This means that Musk ultimately has much more influence, being more than the CEO of a social media platform, even though he is not an elected official.

Given Musk's apparent role under the Trump administration, it makes sense that Apple would attempt to reconcile in some way. Apple's CEO Tim Cook has attended dinners with President Trump, and even donated $1 million of his own money to the inauguration.

Musk was reportedly present during some of these interactions, so it's possible that there were discussions of resuming advertising on X.

A person in a black jacket stands with arms crossed, smiling, against a blue starry background.
Apple is likely introducing X ads to appease Elon Musk because of his newfound political importance.



Tim Cook already has an established strategy for dealing with Donald Trump, where conversations typically focus on a singular issue that affects Apple. It seems that Apple now has to find ways of appeasing Elon Musk as well, presumably due to his newfound importance.

This is likely the only logical explanation as to why Tim Cook, an openly gay man, would choose to interact with someone like Musk, who has repeatedly shared anti-LGBT content on his platform.

Advertising on X, with the associated implications and consequences, is likely significant enough for Apple and Tim Cook to overlook some of Musk's arguably questionable antics. It's possibly all part of a larger move to gain the favor of the Trump administration, its allies, and Republican lawmakers.

The iPhone maker recently renamed the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America in Apple Maps, following an executive order signed by President Trump on January 20, 2025.

It's not entirely clear if Apple's made a genuine commitment, though, or if the company is merely experimenting with X ads. The company's advertising posts have relatively low engagement levels, with the Safari advert only reaching around 129 thousand views -- a minuscule amount compared to the millions of Apple users worldwide.

Though Apple maintains a presence on X via its official accounts, and through the accounts of its executives, it remains to be seen whether or not the iPhone maker will increase or decrease its advertising efforts on the platform, or if it will revert to its previous position. Outside influences seem to be playing a part beyond simply wanting to show ads to users.



Read on AppleInsider

forgot usernamesconosciutomattinoz
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 30
    The word Vichy comes to mind for some reason…
    davenbadmonkDAalsethbart123ricdavgregforgot usernameJanNLmikethemartianSarsara_777Scot1
     9Likes 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 30
    davendaven Posts: 753member
    As an Apple stockholder and fanboy, I’m disappointed.
    badmonknapoleon_phoneapartDAalsethstompybart123ricdavgregforgot usernamefonsoJanNLsconosciuto
     14Likes 7Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 30
    As you can tell from my username, I’m not happy Macrumors closed comments on this mundane story.

    We the people should be able to comment on any story.  Thank you AppleInsider for keeping the flow of opinions open.

    That said, who cares.  X is the #1 social media platform for news.  Why shouldn’t they advertise on X.  It makes smart business sense.  It makes more sense than the Apple Vision Pro toy for $3500
    nubusdavgregforgot usernamefonsosconosciutoxyzzy-xxxbyronlfrankiewelshdogtimpetus
     7Likes 6Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 30
    All I can say for now...
     :s 
    forgot usernamefonsoJanNLxyzzy-xxxbyronldavenwatto_cobraargonautgrandact73
     4Likes 5Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 30
    Apple is slowly becoming more about the bottom line and greed, over their users and what’s right. Tim needs to home and let someone else take over. 
    davgregfonsoJanNLsconosciutoxyzzy-xxxsreebyronltimpetuswatto_cobraargonaut
     2Likes 9Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 30
    Wesley_Hilliardwesley_hilliard Posts: 458member, administrator, moderator, editor
    Apple is slowly becoming more about the bottom line and greed, over their users and what’s right. Tim needs to home and let someone else take over. 
    The problem is I'm not sure Apple has much choice. The people in charge show they will happily fine, tariff, regulate, hijack, invade, attack, or boycott anyone or anything that doesn't follow their every whim. Like with China, it's this or Apple's entire business going up in smoke. Cook seems to be handling this better than the other big tech CEOs which seem to bend over backwards to find new ways to capitulate.

    It sucks, but this administration and its lackeys are temporary. God help us, they better be.
    dewmeilarynxroundaboutnowforgot usernamefonsoJanNLsconosciutobeowulfschmidtsreeEddyMac
     9Likes 8Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 30
    nubusnubus Posts: 790member
    This is a cheap way of silencing Musk. Using X for posting about privacy is Apple being witty and making the best of it. Kudos to the Apple SoMe team!
    davgregforgot usernamesconosciutosreebyronlgrandact73
     3Likes 3Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 30
    Apple is slowly becoming more about the bottom line and greed, over their users and what’s right. Tim needs to home and let someone else take over. 
    The problem is I'm not sure Apple has much choice. The people in charge show they will happily fine, tariff, regulate, hijack, invade, attack, or boycott anyone or anything that doesn't follow their every whim. Like with China, it's this or Apple's entire business going up in smoke. Cook seems to be handling this better than the other big tech CEOs which seem to bend over backwards to find new ways to capitulate.

    It sucks, but this administration and its lackeys are temporary. God help us, they better be.

    Hey Wesley! I see you’re a balanced mind. Thanks for commenting how you did. 
    fonsodavenargonautgrandact73
     2Likes 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 30
    nubus said:
    This is a cheap way of silencing Musk. Using X for posting about privacy is Apple being witty and making the best of it. Kudos to the Apple SoMe team!

    You’re mistaken on both counts, I should think. 

    Deranged and unhinged people like the two commanders in chief the country has at the moment are not given to being silenced or feeling satisfied with a lollipop. They are perennially hungry people whose appetites cannot end even if everything around them does. It may sound weird, but they are diseased people who are under involuntary compulsion. They can’t be helped, they can’t be silenced with breadcrumbs. 

    Next, please explain how exactly is posting about privacy on X being witty? What is on your mind with this? 
    edited February 13
    fonsoJanNLsconosciutonubusbyronlrealjustinlongargonaut
     2Likes 5Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 30
    davgregdavgreg Posts: 1,056member
    Michael Jordan once said Republicans buy sneakers too.

    Apple is in business to sell hardware, software and services and Twitter X is a huge platform and the users stay engaged on it. 

    The fact that Facebook has softened the heavy moderation is an acknowledgement that Musk's changes made to Twitter made sense and have contributed to the revival of what was a dying platform.
    JanNLWesley_Hilliardbyronlrealjustinlongtimpetusargonaut
     4Likes 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 30
    davgreg said:
    Michael Jordan once said Republicans buy sneakers too.

    Apple is in business to sell hardware, software and services and Twitter X is a huge platform and the users stay engaged on it. 

    The fact that Facebook has softened the heavy moderation is an acknowledgement that Musk's changes made to Twitter made sense and have contributed to the revival of what was a dying platform.
    How about Nazis ? 
    fonsoJanNLsconosciutoxyzzy-xxxbyronlfrankierealjustinlongvesaliustimpetusargonaut
     4Likes 7Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 30
    Big tech’s payoff of Trump and Musk is not a recognition that any of this makes sense. It doesn’t. This is a coup d’état and these ads are a bribe to be allowed to live. It’s an acknowledgment that MAGA currently holds all the levers of power. The only thing preventing Trump from acting more recklessly is his awareness that his power may wane in the future, and today’s victims could potentially become his (or his children’s) masters. Like demagogues before him, if Trump were to die, his movement would die.

    It’s crucial to maintain our integrity, be kind and helpful to good people, and work hard towards eliminating the very narrow, but very important, MAGA legislative majority in 2026.

    It’s possible that Tech will eventually rise up and present a legitimate opposition to the Trump mania. Since opposition spans a broad spectrum of concerns, we’ll need to focus on the most important winnable issues. It’s hard to sell “prevent dictatorship” to a nation that has no good way to oppose it.

    Hopefully, we will emerge from this somewhat intact. 

    edited February 13
    JanNLsconosciutomuthuk_vanalingamwatto_cobraargonaut
     3Likes 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 30
    drblankdrblank Posts: 3,386member
    As you can tell from my username, I’m not happy Macrumors closed comments on this mundane story.

    We the people should be able to comment on any story.  Thank you AppleInsider for keeping the flow of opinions open.

    That said, who cares.  X is the #1 social media platform for news.  Why shouldn’t they advertise on X.  It makes smart business sense.  It makes more sense than the Apple Vision Pro toy for $3500
    Elon funds far right wing extremist group AfD in Germany politics, and I watched an interview of Elon's father admit that Elon's grand father in Canada supported the Nazis.  My father served in WWII and he would be absolutely disgusted by the support of Elon and X if he was stlll alive.   It seems as though America is becoming a cross between Nazi Germany and Russia.  disgusting.  Tim has no moral compass.
    fonsoforgot usernameJanNLsconosciutoxyzzy-xxxbyronlfrankierealjustinlongtimpetusargonaut
     4Likes 6Dislikes 1Informative
  • Reply 14 of 30
    Actually pathetic.
    byronlfrankierealjustinlongtimpetusargonaut
     2Likes 3Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 30
    drblank said:
    As you can tell from my username, I’m not happy Macrumors closed comments on this mundane story.

    We the people should be able to comment on any story.  Thank you AppleInsider for keeping the flow of opinions open.

    That said, who cares.  X is the #1 social media platform for news.  Why shouldn’t they advertise on X.  It makes smart business sense.  It makes more sense than the Apple Vision Pro toy for $3500
    Elon funds far right wing extremist group AfD in Germany politics, and I watched an interview of Elon's father admit that Elon's grand father in Canada supported the Nazis.  My father served in WWII and he would be absolutely disgusted by the support of Elon and X if he was stlll alive.   It seems as though America is becoming a cross between Nazi Germany and Russia.  disgusting.  Tim has no moral compass.
    *Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy
    byronltiredskillsfrankieargonautgrandact73
     2Likes 3Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 30
    AppleZuluapplezulu Posts: 2,391member
    It’s still early in this administration. Cook seems to be exercising discretion, trying not to be a target, while not exactly endorsing any of this, either. Cook went to the inauguration, but didn’t sit up front to be used for photo ops. It’s a slippery slope, but there can be wisdom in choosing your battles, rather than stepping forward to be the first cut down, while also not exactly being a boot licker, either. Remember, unlike any of their peers, Apple did not voluntarily shut down its diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives just to please the king. In fact, the programs were sustained through a shareholder vote. So at least thus far, Apple seems to be treading carefully, but is not becoming a Vichy organization. 
    byronlwelshdogwatto_cobragrandact73
     3Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 30
    tobiantobian Posts: 158member
    In my honest opinion, Musk is not sharing “anti-LGBT” content, rather anti-LGBT propagating content. And that’s the difference.. intelligent LGBT people wouldn’t be offended, as they feel naturally self confident.
    Wesley_Hilliardtiredskillsrealjustinlong
     0Likes 3Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 30
    Wesley_Hilliardwesley_hilliard Posts: 458member, administrator, moderator, editor
    davgreg said:
    Michael Jordan once said Republicans buy sneakers too.

    Apple is in business to sell hardware, software and services and Twitter X is a huge platform and the users stay engaged on it. 

    The fact that Facebook has softened the heavy moderation is an acknowledgement that Musk's changes made to Twitter made sense and have contributed to the revival of what was a dying platform.
    No, by all accounts X is still a dying platform. Musk said it is "barely breaking even." And it is still losing users in droves over time. Metas moderation change was a move to appeal to Trump because they want to exist where TikTok wouldn't if a ban was upheld. It was all in vain of course.
    byronlrealjustinlongwatto_cobraargonautgrandact73
     2Likes 3Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 30
    Yeah I’m going to limit my purchases with Apple even if I have to hold onto my devices for the next 7 to 10 years.  Apple used to stand on principle, but I guess they surrender to dictators
    byronlrealjustinlongtimpetuswatto_cobraargonautgrandact73
     2Likes 4Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 30
    Wesley_Hilliardwesley_hilliard Posts: 458member, administrator, moderator, editor
    tobian said:
    In my honest opinion, Musk is not sharing “anti-LGBT” content, rather anti-LGBT propagating content. And that’s the difference.. intelligent LGBT people wouldn’t be offended, as they feel naturally self confident.
    No, there's no confusion here. He straight up hates on gay, trans, or non white people openly, constantly. He tweets every 8 minutes or so and 9 out of 10 are hateful diatribes against the LGBT community or conspiracy theories about white people being replaced.
    nubusbyronltiredskillsfrankiedewmerealjustinlongvesaliustimpetuswatto_cobraargonaut
     5Likes 5Dislikes 1Informative
Sign In or Register to comment.