Apple's upcoming low-cost MacBook: Colorful and affordable

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in Future Apple Hardware

Apple is rumored to be readying a new low-cost MacBook with an A18 processor that if real, will sell by the millions and further drive market share. Let's talk about what's been rumored.

Laptop on white table, open and angled slightly back. Background shows another person using a laptop, with greenery visible through a window.
The 13-inch MacBook Air



The rumor mill seems to believe that Apple is looking at making a new, more affordable MacBook. It is said to come in multiple colors and be powered by an A-series iPhone chip.

The rumor was first posited by supply chain analyst Ming Chi Kuo. In a research note, they said the new machine will be more affordable than what is out there now while keeping the same 13.3-inch screen size.

Unlike with Apple's other budget MacBooks, this one will come in a variety of colors. Kuo suggests silver, blue, pink, and yellow are currently winning out for the hues.

White desktop computer with colorful 'hello' on the screen, Apple logo behind, accompanied by a keyboard and mouse.
We want to see bold, saturated colors available for the new Mac. Credit: Apple



For us, we'd just love for Apple to commit to some vibrancy, but this is hard to do with anodized aluminum. Even so, it would be great to see some punchy colors as seen with versions on iPad or the iMac.

What will be the processor in the low-cost MacBook?



We mentioned this is going to be an A-series chip - likely the A18 Pro as corroborated by multiple sources. The A18 Pro is a chip that debuted in an iPhone.

MacRumors spotted the A18 Pro in the Apple Intelligence backend code referring to a Mac identified as "Mac17.1." Kuo also said they believe the chip to be an A18 Pro.

A square with Apple logo and A18 Pro text, surrounded by faint outlines of various electronic devices on a black background.
The A18 Pro processor from the iPhone 16 Pro



This is the first time we've seen Apple move its custom silicon up the product line to something larger. We've seen portable devices -- like iPad -- move to the M-series chip for higher performance on the go, now we may see the opposite happen.

The A18 Pro first arrived on the iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max in the fall of 2024. It is a 6-core CPU with 2 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores.

It has a 6-core GPU -- one more than the base A18 chip -- and 8GB of memory. This, of course, may change, as Apple Intelligence needs 16GB of RAM.

How fast will the low-cost MacBook be?



Being that the A18 Pro is an iPhone chip, there's already been some Internet hand-wringing about performance.

Bar chart showing Geekbench multi-core scores: M1 at 7,989, A18 Pro at 8,790, and M4 at 14,937.
Performance of the A18 Pro compared to Apple's M1 and M4 chips



In Geekbench 6, the A18 Pro single-core score is just below the M4 chip. Most users are actively using single-core tasks - opening apps, email, social media, looking at photos, dealing with documents -- which would be trivial for the processor.

Bar chart illustrating Geekbench single-core benchmarks: M4 at 3802, A18 Pro at 3429, M1 at 2360.
Performance of the A18 Pro compared to Apple's M1 and M4 chips



The bigger difference would be multicore, as the A18 Pro is a 6-core chip. That multicore score is very close to the M1 chip that Apple still sells through a partnership with Walmart.

What will the low cost MacBook price point cost?



Kuo says Apple will only sell about 20 million Macs in 2025 and wants to return to pre-COVID rates of 25 million by 2026. Part of that strategy is the new MacBook Air.

The new low-cost MacBook is said to account for 5 million to 7 million of those machines. Of course, we have a redesigned MacBook Pro coming soon too, but that's a discussion for another time.

Five colorful laptops with glowing apple logos displayed in purple, yellow, blue, red, and green on a white background.
Colorful renders of the MacBook Air. Credit: Basic Apple Guy



That Walmart M1 MacBook Air officially sells for $699, though it has consistently been listed for $649. This has always been a steal in our opinion based on how solid Apple Silicon is.

It would be great for Apple to start selling this new machine at the same $699 price point through all of its traditional distribution channels.

We're doubtful that Apple will go that low, though. We're expecting to see $799 or $899 at full retail.

When will the low-cost MacBook be released?



This all culminates in the question of timing.

Once again, going back to the supply chain, Ming-Chi Kuo says Apple is ready to ramp up production in late Q4 of 2025. That would be this on track for a launch in the first half of 2026 - possibly in the spring.

Open laptop on white table, with another person using a laptop in the background, against a large window with greenery outside.
The existing MacBook Air



That means we're possibly less than a year away from a very tempting new MacBook, that is more affordable, comes in fun colors, runs an A18 Pro chip, and boasts a solid 13-inch screen.

If these rumors hold, this machine could fly off the shelves.

Rumor Score: Possible

Read on AppleInsider

«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 28
    So it's a large ipad, with a fixed keyboard, no touch screen and runs MacOS. It will sell by the bucketload.

    Personally, I'd love to see Apple revisit the 12" MacBook with this processor instead. It was a brilliant design, just hampered by dreadful performance.
    mrsteppulseimagesRogue01williamlondonAlex1Nne1thelastdonTRAGchia
     7Likes 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 28
    mrstepmrstep Posts: 542member
    So it's a large ipad, with a fixed keyboard, no touch screen and runs MacOS. It will sell by the bucketload.

    Personally, I'd love to see Apple revisit the 12" MacBook with this processor instead. It was a brilliant design, just hampered by dreadful performance.
    It was definitely laptop (not CPU) perfection - toss it in a bag without worrying about it, easy to open and use anywhere.  I was shocked that the 12" @ 2lbs didn't get an M1 makeover, it would have been the ultimate portable.
    pulseimagesAlex1Nne1TRAGchia
     5Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 28
    Mike Wuerthelemike wuerthele Posts: 7,184administrator
    mrstep said:
    So it's a large ipad, with a fixed keyboard, no touch screen and runs MacOS. It will sell by the bucketload.

    Personally, I'd love to see Apple revisit the 12" MacBook with this processor instead. It was a brilliant design, just hampered by dreadful performance.
    It was definitely laptop (not CPU) perfection - toss it in a bag without worrying about it, easy to open and use anywhere.  I was shocked that the 12" @ 2lbs didn't get an M1 makeover, it would have been the ultimate portable.
    Honestly, we were very surprised about this too.
    pulseimagesAlex1Nne1TRAGchia
     5Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 28
    Rogue01rogue01 Posts: 308member

    Personally, I'd love to see Apple revisit the 12" MacBook with this processor instead. It was a brilliant design, just hampered by dreadful performance.
    The 12" MacBook was the worst designed MacBook ever.  It was heavily panned for only having one USB-C port.  You could not plug anything into it and charge at the same time.  Apple doesn't use the dreadful butterfly keyboard anymore, but that 12" MacBook started with the worst of all of those butterfly keyboards because they tried to make it too thin.
    thtravnorodompulseimages
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 28
    Rogue01rogue01 Posts: 308member
    "That Walmart M1 MacBook Air officially sells for $699, though it has consistently been listed for $649. This has always been a steal in our opinion based on how solid Apple Silicon is.  It would be great for Apple to start selling this new machine at the same $699 price point."

    The article should point out that this low price is the worthless 8/256 configuration.  This is not a 'steal'.  If this new A18 MacBook becomes reality, it does not need Apple Intelligence.  The base model new iPad doesn't have it.  So if Apple wanted to make a cheap laptop, you know they would start it at 8/256, because that is how Apple does business.  People buy these 'low cost' Macs by mistake because they don't realize the 8/256 is not upgradable.  There are hundreds of MacBook Pros, all 8/256, for sale on Facebook Marketplace that all say the same thing, 'I got this a few months ago and I barely used it'.  They realized 8/256 is a worthless machine.  So they are trying to sell them for about $500, sometimes less, and they sit on Facebook Marketplace for months with no buyers.

    Apple's idea of 'low cost' is $100 less, and it would be a configuration no one wants.  Add memory and SSD, then you will be better off buying the higher performance model.
    pulseimagesForumPostmuthuk_vanalingam
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 28
    hammeroftruthhammeroftruth Posts: 1,414member
    Rogue01 said:
    "That Walmart M1 MacBook Air officially sells for $699, though it has consistently been listed for $649. This has always been a steal in our opinion based on how solid Apple Silicon is.  It would be great for Apple to start selling this new machine at the same $699 price point."

    The article should point out that this low price is the worthless 8/256 configuration.  This is not a 'steal'.  If this new A18 MacBook becomes reality, it does not need Apple Intelligence.  The base model new iPad doesn't have it.  So if Apple wanted to make a cheap laptop, you know they would start it at 8/256, because that is how Apple does business.  People buy these 'low cost' Macs by mistake because they don't realize the 8/256 is not upgradable.  There are hundreds of MacBook Pros, all 8/256, for sale on Facebook Marketplace that all say the same thing, 'I got this a few months ago and I barely used it'.  They realized 8/256 is a worthless machine.  So they are trying to sell them for about $500, sometimes less, and they sit on Facebook Marketplace for months with no buyers.

    Apple's idea of 'low cost' is $100 less, and it would be a configuration no one wants.  Add memory and SSD, then you will be better off buying the higher performance model.
    It’s not a worthless machine, it’s that people are stupid and don’t know how to manage their files. You don’t need all of your crap from iCloud on your Mac. If you have an iPhone, keep your photos and videos on the phone. You want some pics and vids on your Mac? Fine, just make a separate album for it. Other files? Most people keep them on Google, or files, or ugh, OneDrive. 

    8gb is pretty much standard for a lot of Macs in the past and the only reason why Apple started doubling the ram was their statement about Apple intelligence. In reality, they wanted to meet the same specs as similar configured PC laptops. But do you really need 16gb of ram? No, not unless your one of those people who has to have like 40 tabs open in a browser or has to use teams which is a memory hog. 

    The big point you are missing is that Walmart sells a lot of these and if they were worthless like you are talking about, there would be more 1 star reviews and word would get out that these are crap, they’re not. 

    The other thing to consider is why is Apple making such a device? Look at what Microsoft is doing with Windows 10 and connect the dots. IT departments are looking to replace their fleets of low end laptops that run windows 10, but ironically use web based software. So, if they can buy Macs and save thousands on reduced support costs and no antivirus software costs, it’s a foot into the enterprise market. Right now companies have replaced PCs with iPads, but they’re buying Pros which they don’t need, they can buy a lower end MacBook and save a couple hundred and still use MDM that Apple gives away for free. 
    williamlondondewmeAlex1Npulseimageschia
     3Likes 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 28
    thttht Posts: 6,014member
    13” 220 PPI display, A18 Pro, 12 GB RAM, 256 GB RAM, and 2 USBC ports for $700 would make for a nice machine. Cell modem, 24 GB RAM, and up to 2 TB as options would all be great. 

    The big issue will be whether it can drive two displays. It should be able to drive both the laptop display and extend the screen to 1 external display. 
    Alex1Nraoulduke42
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 28
    doggonedoggone Posts: 413member
    Rogue01 said:
    "That Walmart M1 MacBook Air officially sells for $699, though it has consistently been listed for $649. This has always been a steal in our opinion based on how solid Apple Silicon is.  It would be great for Apple to start selling this new machine at the same $699 price point."

    The article should point out that this low price is the worthless 8/256 configuration.  This is not a 'steal'.  If this new A18 MacBook becomes reality, it does not need Apple Intelligence.  The base model new iPad doesn't have it.  So if Apple wanted to make a cheap laptop, you know they would start it at 8/256, because that is how Apple does business.  People buy these 'low cost' Macs by mistake because they don't realize the 8/256 is not upgradable.  There are hundreds of MacBook Pros, all 8/256, for sale on Facebook Marketplace that all say the same thing, 'I got this a few months ago and I barely used it'.  They realized 8/256 is a worthless machine.  So they are trying to sell them for about $500, sometimes less, and they sit on Facebook Marketplace for months with no buyers.

    Apple's idea of 'low cost' is $100 less, and it would be a configuration no one wants.  Add memory and SSD, then you will be better off buying the higher performance model.
    It's the base model.  What do you expect for that?  Certainly not all the bells and whistles.  I certainly wouldn't this type of machine and am currently typing this on a M1 MBP with 16BG ram and 512GB SSD.  That is the minimum for me given my usage.

    The point is that most people use a laptop for web surfing and shopping.  So 8GB RAM will do.  They may never create a file and save it on their Mac.  They don't need the photo library on their Mac.  So 256GB SSD will do.

    A low cost Mac provides access to the product line for those who are tight on money but want to have a Mac.  It also helps Apple squeeze the competition into lowering their prices which is want Apple did very successfully with the iPod market.  This is not competition for Chromebooks but for the standard mid range PC laptops which is what Apple needs to address next.
    edited July 11
    williamlondondewmeAlex1N
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 28
    saareksaarek Posts: 1,642member
    As long as it has 16GB of Ram and a 256GB SSD I’ll order one the second they get released.
    williamlondonAlex1NnubusForumPost
     3Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 28
    Should we be calling this new laptop the iPhonebook?
    williamlondonAlex1NpulseimagesForumPost
     1Like 3Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 28
    flug_mflug_m Posts: 1member
    I just registered to propose this idea: What if Apple isn't targeting consumers with this MacBook, but rather enterprises?

    At my workplace, we use a Virtual Desktop environment, and our current solution is the 10zig platform; 10zig is not performing well with videoconferencing (don't ask about bluetooth accessories either), and as far as I know, a 10zig thin client costs maybe $600 (for a desktop model), $850 for a laptop-form thin client.

    Basic requirements for a thin client:
    * Support two external displays
    * Support a VDI client (Omnissa, Parallels, Azure Desktop, etc)
    * Support external keyboard/mouse
    * Support MDM or another form of Enterprise management.
    * Ethernet preferred over wifi (achievable in a docking solution, I guess)
    * Low repair/maintenance costs

    Future proof:
    * Support zero-trust networking
    * Cloud-first/cloud-only work paradigms
    * 4+ years hardware/software support
    * Highly secure platform
    * Mobility strongly preferred (eg, laptop-form as a minimum)

    Apple has a strong opportunity to compete in this market, similar to the iPhone 5c (and their iPhone 16e models); they've demonstrated a lot of competency on basic issues not just with devices (Bluetooth and video), but with enterprise workflows (MDM, secure networking), so this allows them to enter a growing market segment and be well-positioned 5 years down the road for zero-trust cloud-only environments.  And honestly?  you don't need a ton of RAM/storage to run MS Office + the thin client software, at least for 80% of the org's users; the power users can target higher-performance machines, obviously.
    Alex1NForumPostmattinozmacminionjem101
     5Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 28
    ne1ne1 Posts: 87member
    mrstep said:
    So it's a large ipad, with a fixed keyboard, no touch screen and runs MacOS. It will sell by the bucketload.

    Personally, I'd love to see Apple revisit the 12" MacBook with this processor instead. It was a brilliant design, just hampered by dreadful performance.
    It was definitely laptop (not CPU) perfection - toss it in a bag without worrying about it, easy to open and use anywhere.  I was shocked that the 12" @ 2lbs didn't get an M1 makeover, it would have been the ultimate portable.
    Honestly, we were very surprised about this too.
    I was surprised about it, too. Anyone who ever used the 12" MacBook knows what a useful and portable device it was. I still have my 2017 model as a (rarely used) museum piece. If they can create one with better cooling despite the fanless design we'll have a winner here.
    s.metcalfTRAGraoulduke42chia
     4Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 28
    s.metcalfs.metcalf Posts: 1,025member
    Now give me 17 inches and I’ll be happy!
    williamlondonchia
     0Likes 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 28
    s.metcalfs.metcalf Posts: 1,025member
    Oh and 4K resolution in that 17” (wish they brought edit back, even for just 5 minutes!).
    williamlondonchia
     0Likes 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 28
    M68000m68000 Posts: 950member
    flug_m said:
    I just registered to propose this idea: What if Apple isn't targeting consumers with this MacBook, but rather enterprises?

    At my workplace, we use a Virtual Desktop environment, and our current solution is the 10zig platform; 10zig is not performing well with videoconferencing (don't ask about bluetooth accessories either), and as far as I know, a 10zig thin client costs maybe $600 (for a desktop model), $850 for a laptop-form thin client.

    Basic requirements for a thin client:
    * Support two external displays
    * Support a VDI client (Omnissa, Parallels, Azure Desktop, etc)
    * Support external keyboard/mouse
    * Support MDM or another form of Enterprise management.
    * Ethernet preferred over wifi (achievable in a docking solution, I guess)
    * Low repair/maintenance costs

    Future proof:
    * Support zero-trust networking
    * Cloud-first/cloud-only work paradigms
    * 4+ years hardware/software support
    * Highly secure platform
    * Mobility strongly preferred (eg, laptop-form as a minimum)

    Apple has a strong opportunity to compete in this market, similar to the iPhone 5c (and their iPhone 16e models); they've demonstrated a lot of competency on basic issues not just with devices (Bluetooth and video), but with enterprise workflows (MDM, secure networking), so this allows them to enter a growing market segment and be well-positioned 5 years down the road for zero-trust cloud-only environments.  And honestly?  you don't need a ton of RAM/storage to run MS Office + the thin client software, at least for 80% of the org's users; the power users can target higher-performance machines, obviously.
    Have to disagree a bit about MS Office and not needing “a ton” of ram.  Where I work,  it’s not uncommon to have people open 10 to 20
    spreadsheets.  Throw in antivirus and some other security software and ram go a fast.
    williamlondonmuthuk_vanalingam
     1Like 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 28
    MplsPmplsp Posts: 4,177member
    M68000 said:
    flug_m said:
    I just registered to propose this idea: What if Apple isn't targeting consumers with this MacBook, but rather enterprises?

    At my workplace, we use a Virtual Desktop environment, and our current solution is the 10zig platform; 10zig is not performing well with videoconferencing (don't ask about bluetooth accessories either), and as far as I know, a 10zig thin client costs maybe $600 (for a desktop model), $850 for a laptop-form thin client.

    Basic requirements for a thin client:
    * Support two external displays
    * Support a VDI client (Omnissa, Parallels, Azure Desktop, etc)
    * Support external keyboard/mouse
    * Support MDM or another form of Enterprise management.
    * Ethernet preferred over wifi (achievable in a docking solution, I guess)
    * Low repair/maintenance costs

    Future proof:
    * Support zero-trust networking
    * Cloud-first/cloud-only work paradigms
    * 4+ years hardware/software support
    * Highly secure platform
    * Mobility strongly preferred (eg, laptop-form as a minimum)

    Apple has a strong opportunity to compete in this market, similar to the iPhone 5c (and their iPhone 16e models); they've demonstrated a lot of competency on basic issues not just with devices (Bluetooth and video), but with enterprise workflows (MDM, secure networking), so this allows them to enter a growing market segment and be well-positioned 5 years down the road for zero-trust cloud-only environments.  And honestly?  you don't need a ton of RAM/storage to run MS Office + the thin client software, at least for 80% of the org's users; the power users can target higher-performance machines, obviously.
    Have to disagree a bit about MS Office and not needing “a ton” of ram.  Where I work,  it’s not uncommon to have people open 10 to 20
    spreadsheets.  Throw in antivirus and some other security software and ram go a fast.
    These probably wouldn’t be a good fit for you, then. 

    These probably majority of consumers use a computer for email, web browsing, simple documents and spreadsheets and maybe a few more apps. An iPad is more than capable of handling all of these. The issue with iPads isn’t the processing power, it’s the limitations of iOS. 

    This arrangement would be perfect for a large number of consumers at a great price point. Think about how much a 12” iPad with keyboard and case costs - it’s as much or more than most laptops.  

    I completely agree with resurrecting the original MBA design. The only issue would be depth for the camera. 
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 28
    macxpressmacxpress Posts: 6,006member
    M68000 said:
    flug_m said:
    I just registered to propose this idea: What if Apple isn't targeting consumers with this MacBook, but rather enterprises?

    At my workplace, we use a Virtual Desktop environment, and our current solution is the 10zig platform; 10zig is not performing well with videoconferencing (don't ask about bluetooth accessories either), and as far as I know, a 10zig thin client costs maybe $600 (for a desktop model), $850 for a laptop-form thin client.

    Basic requirements for a thin client:
    * Support two external displays
    * Support a VDI client (Omnissa, Parallels, Azure Desktop, etc)
    * Support external keyboard/mouse
    * Support MDM or another form of Enterprise management.
    * Ethernet preferred over wifi (achievable in a docking solution, I guess)
    * Low repair/maintenance costs

    Future proof:
    * Support zero-trust networking
    * Cloud-first/cloud-only work paradigms
    * 4+ years hardware/software support
    * Highly secure platform
    * Mobility strongly preferred (eg, laptop-form as a minimum)

    Apple has a strong opportunity to compete in this market, similar to the iPhone 5c (and their iPhone 16e models); they've demonstrated a lot of competency on basic issues not just with devices (Bluetooth and video), but with enterprise workflows (MDM, secure networking), so this allows them to enter a growing market segment and be well-positioned 5 years down the road for zero-trust cloud-only environments.  And honestly?  you don't need a ton of RAM/storage to run MS Office + the thin client software, at least for 80% of the org's users; the power users can target higher-performance machines, obviously.
    Have to disagree a bit about MS Office and not needing “a ton” of ram.  Where I work,  it’s not uncommon to have people open 10 to 20
    spreadsheets.  Throw in antivirus and some other security software and ram go a fast.
    I don't think this is meant to be a cheap enterprise solution, but rather just a cheaper solution to drive more Mac sales, possibly in the education sector that's currently dominated by Crapbooks (Chromebooks). It doesn't need to drive 2 displays, it doesn't need to have a ton of RAM or even a lot of SSD space. For the price point I doubt a standard config would be more than 8GB with 256GB SSD (the exact config everyone seems to hate). This could be like the next gen eMac...only in a laptop form where it's a cheap Mac made for education and happens to also be offered to the public just like the eMac was back in the day. I think it could be popular and if they could add some colors like the iMac it would be a nice fit for students and schools who need more than an iPad to day to day use. 
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 28
    chasmchasm Posts: 3,778member
    Rogue01 said:
    The article should point out that this low price is the worthless 8/256 configuration.  This is not a 'steal'. 

    Apple's idea of 'low cost' is $100 less, and it would be a configuration no one wants.  Add memory and SSD, then you will be better off buying the higher performance model.
    The article does point this out. Quoting: "It would be great for Apple to start selling this new machine at the same $699 price point through all of its traditional distribution channels."

    If someone is buying the cheapest option of a given Mac line, they know perfectly well that they are getting the base spec. That's why Apple offers other configurations for more money.

    At this point, if someone doesn't understand that a lowest retail price = shorter useful lifespan, that's on them.

    Should such a machine actually appear, especially in those colours, I think even the unwashed masses of the general public would understand that this is a computer for their school-age kids, not them.
    edited July 12
    tht
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 28
    MplsPmplsp Posts: 4,177member
    chasm said:
    Rogue01 said:
    The article should point out that this low price is the worthless 8/256 configuration.  This is not a 'steal'. 

    Apple's idea of 'low cost' is $100 less, and it would be a configuration no one wants.  Add memory and SSD, then you will be better off buying the higher performance model.
    The article does point this out. Quoting: "It would be great for Apple to start selling this new machine at the same $699 price point through all of its traditional distribution channels."

    If someone is buying the cheapest option of a given Mac line, they know perfectly well that they are getting the base spec. That's why Apple offers other configurations for more money.

    At this point, if someone doesn't understand that a lowest retail price = shorter useful lifespan, that's on them.

    Should such a machine actually appear, especially in those colours, I think even the unwashed masses of the general public would understand that this is a computer for their school-age kids, not them.
    I’m writing this on an (aging) 12.9” 2nd gen ipad pro with an A10 processor. I got the 512GB version which is effectively what the hard drive would be for a MacBook. I believe the processor has 4GB of onboard RAM. This machine is starting to show its age but still works surprisingly well and is perfectly fine for web browsing, reading and composing emails and the like. I have a MacBook Pro that I use for heavier duty tasks but honestly, if I had a laptop with an A18 processor it would probably work for almost all of my needs. Maybe I’m part of the ‘unwashed masses’ but I suspect there would be a huge market for such a machine.
    williamlondonraoulduke42pulseimages
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 28
    I bought my first Mac in 1986 so I am a little worried.  Low cost computers are low margin computers.  Can Apple make money selling products like this?  Last time they went after the low end high volume market, in the late 1990s, they almost went under and thankfully Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, and Johnny Ive saved them.  It is different now with high volume high margin Iphones and services supporting the company but I'm still a little worried.
    williamlondon
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.