How did this go from "Jobs says Pixar sale means more time for Apple" to "Most diabolical name ever" discussion?
Must be the unforeseen conclusion that Steve will have more time for Apple now that he has sold his other business... Like... Duh!!!! Let's see, yes: "Steve Jobs becomes the CEO of Disney and Apple.
Why would anyone vote against this? How much money is it going to lose the already rich shareholders to put a bit of money into environmental protection? Hell, it would probably make them more as it would put Apple in an even better light than they already are!
Fucking Capitalism!
[/rant]
Mainly because the announcement last week/two weeks ago to recycle computers on the purchase of a new one makes Apple on of the most environmentally friendly computer companies there is.
In the Netherlands we have a police tv series where the two main characters are named De Cock (last name) and Dick (first name; his last name is Vledder). Quite the duo, for the English speaking crowd...
Mainly because the announcement last week/two weeks ago to recycle computers on the purchase of a new one makes Apple on of the most environmentally friendly computer companies there is.
Basic tenet of environmentalism: the world is fucked and whatever action is taken is always not enough.
Just mucking around here, there are other more "positive" views of environmentalism and more "hopeful" Gaia perspectives..?
I guess running Apple has grown in to a full time job, with the massive increase in size. And can't those environmentalist scum use someone else's meeting as a publicity vehicle please?
Why don't they do something more productive with their time, like posting on a computer-related discussion board?
The difference is I do not interupt shareholder meetings to read my posts out. If they want to preach their nonsense let them do it on their own time, not Apple's.
The difference is I do not interupt shareholder meetings to read my posts out. If they want to preach their nonsense let them do it on their own time, not Apple's.
It was a "meeting". The environmentalists "proposed" something. Apple "rejected" the proposal. The meeting continued.
That's how share-holder meetings work. Pull your head out of your a**.
Comments
Originally posted by zpapasmurf
Hey... at least he doesnt work for "Dikshit"... no joke... the name is bad enough... but do you really have to name your company that too?
Try saying you work for "Dikshit" with a straight face.
In elementary, my principal's last name was Crappaschitts. His first name was Chuck.
\t
quote:Originally posted by zpapasmurf
Hey... at least he doesnt work for "Dikshit"... no joke... the name is bad enough... but do you really have to name your company that too?
Try saying you work for "Dikshit" with a straight face.
In elementary, my principal's last name was Crappaschitts. His first name was Chuck.
I had a teacher named Dickcock
Must be the unforeseen conclusion that Steve will have more time for Apple now that he has sold his other business... Like... Duh!!!! Let's see, yes: "Steve Jobs becomes the CEO of Disney and Apple.
Originally posted by Sekio
Why would anyone vote against this? How much money is it going to lose the already rich shareholders to put a bit of money into environmental protection? Hell, it would probably make them more as it would put Apple in an even better light than they already are!
Fucking Capitalism!
[/rant]
Mainly because the announcement last week/two weeks ago to recycle computers on the purchase of a new one makes Apple on of the most environmentally friendly computer companies there is.
Originally posted by polyester
In elementary, my principal's last name was Crappaschitts. His first name was Chuck.
A guy's (in Highschool) last name was Ficken (in German "ficken" is a
vulgar word of "to have sex") . This guy had a tough time actually.
Originally posted by iPeon
How did this go from "Jobs says Pixar sale means more time for Apple" to "Most diabolical name ever" discussion?
...
This is not that far fetched, is it? Any thread can u-turn
at any time soon, if you don't mind.
Originally posted by geo06
I had a teacher named Dickcock
In the Netherlands we have a police tv series where the two main characters are named De Cock (last name) and Dick (first name; his last name is Vledder). Quite the duo, for the English speaking crowd...
Originally posted by wilco
So, it's gotten to the point where you're replying to your own posts?
Originally posted by the_snitch
Originally posted by DeaPeaJay
That's not funny, it's just petty. Am I missing something?
Originally posted by Flounder
Are you kidding me? That was post of the week material right there!
Agreed, big time!
Mainly because the announcement last week/two weeks ago to recycle computers on the purchase of a new one makes Apple on of the most environmentally friendly computer companies there is.
Basic tenet of environmentalism: the world is fucked and whatever action is taken is always not enough.
Just mucking around here, there are other more "positive" views of environmentalism and more "hopeful" Gaia perspectives..?
Originally posted by sunilraman
BACK ON TOPIC NOW !!
No! Not until I point out http://www.dickhyman.com/
Originally posted by gregmightdothat
No! Not until I point out http://www.dickhyman.com/
HOLY F**** hahahhahaahaah roflmao
Originally posted by Ireland
Huh? Your not serious right! You mean you didn't hear the news about what's coming! It's huge
Yea, a mac built into a TV!
HUGE!
now, where's my sandwich?
Originally posted by TednDi
now, where's my sandwich?
<soup nazi> NO SANDWICH FOR U..!! </soup nazi>
Originally posted by geo06
I had a teacher named Dickcock
I knew a girl with a last name "woodcock."
Originally posted by ascii
And can't those environmentalist scum use someone else's meeting as a publicity vehicle please?
Totally! Why don't they do something more productive with their time, like posting on a computer-related discussion board?
Why so bitter, did a dingo eat your baby?
Originally posted by wilco
Why don't they do something more productive with their time, like posting on a computer-related discussion board?
The difference is I do not interupt shareholder meetings to read my posts out. If they want to preach their nonsense let them do it on their own time, not Apple's.
Originally posted by ascii
The difference is I do not interupt shareholder meetings to read my posts out. If they want to preach their nonsense let them do it on their own time, not Apple's.
It was a "meeting". The environmentalists "proposed" something. Apple "rejected" the proposal. The meeting continued.
That's how share-holder meetings work. Pull your head out of your a**.