bill1357

actually today's video doesn't offer a fair anything,

and Appleinsider has made a fool of itself claiming such
even "they" admit that "Jer..." is an idiot self seeking publicity nut,

yet they publish this crap anyway

so to satisfy EU antitrust, giggle resorts to bribery?

I seem to remember a phrase "shooting yourself in the foot".

you mention the massive power supply, and it is not bad, but one of their competitors is offering 175W, which would both charge the MacPro at full rate and power peripherals.  I wish OWC would offer that.  

Of course, I haven't seen the 175W and maybe it wouldn't even fit in my pickup so I may be ignoring practicality for numbers.  Still it would be nice to have the power.

What would be really nice would be the option of either---maybe one could buy a high power supply or choose a lower power supply.

Love the concept of your articles, but you should learn to edit;  I mean talk less; this goes on and on to the extent of stupidity.

More is not always better; you should learn to say "no" to yourself.

Not sure if this is true, but it seems like I have heard that Intels 10 nm and TSMC's are quite different and that perhaps if Intels ever works, it will be noticeably better than TSMC's at the same line width.  One of course has to also take into account that sometimes a tech number in nm refers only to SOME of the features, like maybe the company pushed one or a few features smaller while the overall chip is more represented by a larger nm number.  No real way to tell without reading the tech papers.  Listening to the "advertising" doesn't hack it.