avon b7

About

Username
avon b7
Joined
Visits
112
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
12,554
Badges
2
Posts
8,219
  • Trump gives Apple a giant break with wide-ranging tariff exemptions

    I'd like to say "cunning plan Baldrick!" but that would be offensive to poor Baldrick.

    So Trump is doing the walk. Walking things back! 

    He's making history for all the wrong reasons. 
    psliceqwerty52londordanoxmuthuk_vanalingamTomPMRIglnfdewmeAlex1NAulani
  • EU pushes forward with Apple antitrust investigation despite Trump's criticisms

    Kwikiwi said:
    Like everything in life, there are multiple views on the EU and their regulations - Some are good and some are terrible - The issue I have with the massive fine the placed on Apple for the tex issue in Ireland was that they retrospectively prosecuted Apple for what a country (Ireland) had done in setting up it's tax rules to attract business to the country - Apple did absolutely nothing wrong in this area and complied with every rule Ireland set them - they made massive investments in the country, and received a fair reward. The EU fined Apple - not Ireland - that is absolutely crazy and completely wrong. The USA should hold the EU to account for that as it is totally unjust.

    On the other stuff - Apple does not have a monopoly on apps - there are plenty of options open to consumers - people who decide to buy Apple products do so because of quality, security, privacy and the ecosystem safety - for the EU to dictate that should change is just plain wrong and it is just a form of taxation - again the USA should push back on the EU on this.

    In some other areas, such as privacy laws - I think the EU is ahead of the USA - also on harmful content and in this areas I think they are more right than wrong.
    Apple was given what some call a 'sweetheart' deal by the Irish government. That was deemed illegal state aid and Ireland had to recover it from Apple. 

    The EU didn't fine Apple. 

    Was the 0.005% rate for 2014 just or unjust? 

    Was Apple, effectively being able to decide what it made available for taxation, just or unjust? 
    muthuk_vanalingamrundhvidsphericgatorguywatto_cobra
  • Sponsored: How to stop spam calls and reclaim some sanity on your iPhone

    elijahg said:
    The dumbest thing here is Apple won't let you (or third party apps) block a range of numbers. Why can't I block +1 800 *, or +1 800 850 {0-999} for example? Or indeed block or silence anyone who's not in my contacts? 
    Try this for unknown callers...

    https://support.apple.com/en-us/111106#:~:text=To turn on Silence Unknown,in your recent calls list. 
    muthuk_vanalingamelijahg
  • China calls Trump's trade war a joke, jumps tariffs on U.S. goods to 125%

    DAalseth said:
    The US needs stuff from China more than China needs ANYTHING from the US.
    I expect there may be exemptions for Amazon, Apple and Walmart. But the hundreds of thousands of small stores, local stores, regional stores, that are the heart of the economy will be massacred. 

    As someone pointed out yesterday, this whole scrap is above all making China look like the reliable, stable, rational, trustworthy partner. That is going to be the most harmful thing coming out of this for the US.
    China needs money from the US to run their economy.  The US is by far their biggest customer whereas we are mostly consumers of their products - many of them not essential for daily life.  Yes, some small businesses rely on their cheap Chinese products but they will have to adapt in the short term - you don’t fold because some segments get hurt.  If the US stops buying the Chinese goods then China must sell them elsewhere, or shutter factories, which floods the market and crashes their prices.  Forgotten in all this is the massive theft by China on IP which was being reversed by the first Trump administration and then was unexplainable dropped by the Biden administration.  This needs to be corrected as well and this requires the Chinese govt to enforce.  
    What happened with agriculture in his last term? China quickly pivoted away to Brazil. Lobsters from Maine? China went to Canada.

    China is in a situation - provoked by the US - where mutual trade is severely impacted. 

    They won't go crawling to Trump and they've made that very clear. 

    They will continue to get rid of US debt but with a common sense approach. They will tighten restrictions on critical minerals/rare earths. They could even switch away from Boeing to Airbus as a symbolic move. They will strengthen BRICS+ deals as well as tempt the EU. 

    At the end of the day it is Trump who started everything and it is Trump who will have to fix it. 

    He blinked first with the 90 day pause. Now he will have to blink again. 
    emcnairbadmonk9secondkox2tdknoxlibertyandfreelondordanoxroundaboutnowbaconstangThatguy2
  • Apple to build AI servers in Houston, invest $500B in U.S. economy

    rob53 said:
    Why in Texas? People thought Apple's products were getting too expensive, just wait for products coming out of Texas. They will break everyone's budget. Who in Texas will actually work at this manufacturing facility? Will everything be automated? Where will the people for these 20K come from, India? Who's going to build the facility? Not the hardest workers from south of the border. trump made sure of that.
    The servers aren't for sale so that isn't a factor in that particular regard. They are for in-house use so Apple can swallow the costs. They were built outside the US previously for good reason. 

    Now, with tariffs and all, and also federal or state incentives, it probably works out as acceptable to do the manufacturing on US soil. 

    Reducing supply chain external interplay (and possible interference) is also becoming a hot topic so the more manufacturing is done at home makes sense as long as it doesn't break the bank to do so. 

    I agree that 20,000 jobs is a drop in the ocean but anything is better than nothing. How many will go to US citizens is another matter but I'm sure that Cook pushed back on Trump thinking in that regard in their meetings in order for Apple to be able to hire whoever is needed with little red tape.

    Most of this announcement is probably not really Trump related. The server farms (Apple manufactured or not) were probably in the final stages of planning before Trump got back into the White House. 
    muthuk_vanalingamsconosciutorobin huberlibertyandfreedanoxroundaboutnowentropysBart Ymarklarkwatto_cobra
  • China escalates US tariff war by halting rare earth mineral exports

    jfabula1 said:
    That’s good…..China is not reliable. The world now will think otherwise to build their own rare earth material supplies. Why did the US so reliant on these? We do have different priorities that are bad, relying on cheap goods will bite us in the ass.
    I'm not sure where you want to go with that. China has been far more reliable than the US and is non-interventionist.

    Rare earth processing is not done much on the US because, while the ore is easy to extract, processing it requires technology that isn't easy to find in the US. It's also very environmentally unfriendly unless you want processing to cost a lot more. 

    China has only imposed the threat of restrictions (through licencing) because of US policy actions. You can't blame them for using what they have to push back. 
    muthuk_vanalingamdewmeroundaboutnowbloggerblogdanoxradarthekatsinophilia
  • Trump's 104% tariff against imports from China goes live

    And here he is gloating to fellow Republicans last night:

    “I’m telling you, these countries are calling us up kissing my ass.”

    The John Wayne of politics is probably how he sees himself.

    I wonder how the Chinese will take that when contemplating any possible future meeting.

    https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/trump-s-trade-chief-admits-us-running-up-the-score-with-tariffs-on-australia-20250409-p5lqap.html
    glnfelijahgdaviOS_Guy80cfilipponiteejay2012pulseimagesgavza
  • Trump blinks: Floats suggestion that Apple might get a tariff exemption

    It’s not a “blink.” It has been mentioned a lot here on ai before the tariffs came on. Apple would get an exemption. I’ve personally posted this a few times. 

    Smart people do smart things. It’s why cook preemptively met with the president prior to the election and why the admin is letting some of the fine tuning show now. It’s always shock and awe to rile up the immoveable players. Then settles into the details. It’s why you hear the phrase/torle “art of the deal” being so talked about lately. 

    As I’ve BEEN saying, Apple willl be fine. 
    And the delusional cult continues on unabated, Dear Leader must not be questioned. 

    Meanwhile in reality Trump has shown how much of a lame duck president he is and U.S. is much weaker on the world stage than it was a week ago.  

    And because you pointed out in an other thread that you woefully uninformed on trade, let me help you out. What you and Trumpty Dumpty seem to be missing is Trump can't protect Apple or any other company from China. If China decides to start targeting U.S. companies like Apple or Tesla and just boots them from the country then they are absolutely screwed. The U.S. doesn't have the advanced manufacturing capabilities of China and that is something that would take at least a decade to build out. China does almost all of the world's refining of rare earth minerals. Replacing that capability will take a decade to do. China holds way more cards in this trade war than just tariffs. Turmpty Dumpty has brought a squirt gun to a gun fight. 

    Maybe, just maybe, ponder the potential consequences of Trumps actions rather than blindly cheerleading for him 


    Just to continue the rare earth theme. China has recently selected seven rare earths that are essential to high tech manufacturing and made them exportable only under licence (a non-monetary tariff countermeasure) . We will learn over the coming days if the US will be cut off completely or partially from these rare earths.


    HobeSoundDarryl
  • Trump has not raised big tech China tariffs to 245 percent

    Most analysts seem to accept that any tariff over 50 or 60% effectively kills trade options so anything far over that is just a meaningless number.

    That is why China said it wouldn't be further increasing it's own tariffs but take other non-tariff measures. 

    We've seen the rare earths option and now there are rumours about Boeing taking a hit. 

    Meanwhile, on the US side, Nvidia has announced a charge that could hit $5B due to new US restrictions on chips it specifically designed for the Chinese market due to previous sanctions. The US thinks it will also stall China's supercomputer efforts but China stopped reporting it's supercomputing numbers a few years ago and they were said to be already ahead in that race but laying low on the marketing side. 

    And this is happening on the same day that rumours claim that Huawei is moving forward and testing a huge AI Supernode in its Wuhu data centre complex.

    Nvidia must be fuming. 
    thtssfe11muthuk_vanalingam12Strangers
  • China calls Trump's trade war a joke, jumps tariffs on U.S. goods to 125%

    Thatguy2 said:
    Time to come out of your news bubble. China shutting down majority of factories calling it a worker holiday. With no wages of course and no idea when or if factories will reopen. Factory owners all over tik tok selling equipment showing the devastation. Two more weeks and 80% of factories will close. Four two six weeks Chinese economic collapse. Most Chinese companies receiving nothing but order cancellations. Chinese are terrified. Those videos are shocking. I had no idea their economy could be brought down so fast. 
    China isn't shutting down a majority of factories.

    Less than 15% of China's global exports go to the US. 

    Some factories are likely to slow down production for a time. Some might even close. This happens all the time - everywhere!

    But, think about what you are saying. How will those products be replaced within the US market? If the US can make them at all it can't do be done overnight. It definitely can't be done for lower main street pricing.

    By your very own logic that must mean that US employees involved with transporting those goods, storing those good and selling those goods will also have less work and therefore the risk of being laid off.

    China has made it clear. There are no winners in a trade war. 

    londorqwerty52ronn