dhawkins541

About

Username
dhawkins541
Joined
Visits
40
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
173
Badges
0
Posts
107
  • 'iPhone 12' predicted to ship without EarPods, will boost AirPods sales

    flydog said:
    take earpods that's fine but everyone better get the better charger not only the pro devices. Don't go giving us no pods and then stick us with that 5 watt bs to charge up 
    Or what? You’ll switch to Android? 
    Does it matter to you? No, so why even ask such an idiotic question anyway. Go troll someone else. 
    muthuk_vanalingamchemengin1dewmelkrupp
  • Apple may release a cheaper Apple TV streaming device in 2022, says Kuo

    Why don't they make the HD model at least somewhat cheaper it's got an A8 which is older than the iPod touch they just discontinued? Just a thought $99 that would be a way easier sell to people that want 4K but want in on the apple hardware. 
    darkvaderwilliamlondonwatto_cobra
  • No redesign coming to Apple Watch Series 8, says leaker

    Can we sadly get more storage this year? Because the reminders app has some weird crap that makes it take up ludicrous amounts of storage on my watch and even Apple support was zero help to fix it. 
    lkrupph4y3s
  • Future MacBook Pro might have solid state keyboard, like its trackpad

    Not to nitpick but can I get some damn haptic feedback on my iPhone X keyboard…
    doozydozenaylkcornchipwilliamlondongrandact73
  • 'The Device That Saved Me' Apple Watch video from 'Time Flies' event released

    My wife's apple watch detected an issue with my heart and got to spend 2 days in ICU but thankful to still be here with my family. Emailed Tim but I didn't make the video but he did email me back and wished me well and so forth. 
    stompyStrangeDayspulseimagesRayz2016BeatscaladanianSpamSandwichwatto_cobra
  • Apple may release a cheaper Apple TV streaming device in 2022, says Kuo

    lkrupp said:
    Why don't they make the HD model at least somewhat cheaper it's got an A8 which is older than the iPod touch they just discontinued? Just a thought $99 that would be a way easier sell to people that want 4K but want in on the apple hardware. 
    Nope, not a chance. And as for wanting ‘in’ on Apple hardware, you have to pay for that.
    Not chance is what you say, but unless you're the CEO that isn't up to you. Apple can do whatever they want but fact is selling that old hardware for $30 different from the 4k model with updated specs is kinda silly with or without the remote. 
    williamlondonasdasdelijahg
  • YouTube reportedly testing Picture in Picture for its iOS app

    mazda 3s said:
    What? It works fine on the iPad if you cross Googles pay barrier. Also, on the iPhone if you pay as well, but until recently it would just play in the background audio but now with iOS 14 we've got PIP. This writer needs to clarify this or something. 
    The story is talking about with the app, not with YouTube in Safari. I don't know about you, but I access YouTube primarily with the app on my iPhone.

    Yeah with the app on both iphone and iPad you can play it in PIP/background with YouTube premium that's been that way for a long time. Aka a charge per month. I'm not saying that they may not be changing their policy to have it work for everyone to say it doesn't now is an error. 
    watto_cobramuthuk_vanalingam
  • Apple One bundle includes Apple Music, Apple TV+, Apple Arcade and more

    That's actually money saved for my family. 
    StrangeDaysBeatslolliverwilliamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Congressman says antitrust hearing confirmed Apple's 'deeply disturbing' behavior

    Ready, set, fail…
    doozydozenmike1killroywatto_cobra
  • Apple tells Epic judge to consider Supreme Court NCAA decision

    tommikele said:
    focher said:
    mr lizard said:
    I’m sure that patronising attempt to help the judge reach her decision will go down well. 
    It's not "patronizing" in a legal case because the parties are obligated to put everything on-the-record in the event of any appeal.

    If you want to talk about legal stuff, go to law school first.
    I appreciate your comment. So many people here and places like 9to5 comment about things they know nothing about, but wish to present themselves as experts or highly experienced attorneys with practices focused on the subject at hand. In reality, they are responding with emotional based fanboism and know nothing about the legal aspects of the topic. When you do have some direct experience and read this stuff you want to slap them (not literally) upside the head and let them know they may be fooling themselves, but not you.

    In this case, Mr. Lizard is a pretty good example of it. He also spells patronizing with an "s" instead of a "z" indicating he is educated somewhere other than the US and probably a resident/citizen of the UK or Australia  or some other place where the Queen's grammar rules. That makes it highly unlikely he knows anything about the the US courts or the subject other than the articles his fanboism leads him to read. To sum it up, he probably doesn't know squat about this and his comment about the Judge reflects the ignorance and a lack of respect for the law and court system.
    I think you hit the nail on the head for the modern internet. We now have all these so-called "internet experts" or everything is a conspiracy of "big government" that finding intelligent logical dialog becomes muddled with garbage and even banter derails into nonsense.
    lkruppkillroywatto_cobra