SpamSandwich
About
- Banned
- Username
- SpamSandwich
- Joined
- Visits
- 143
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 13,384
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 33,407
Reactions
-
Bill introduced to strip Section 230 protections from the internet
larryjw said:Good way to rid the airwaves of Trump and his lackeys permanently -
Apple, other tech companies continue to resist encryption backdoor proposals by FBI, U.S. ...
-
FCC head says commission can interpret Section 230 regulations, signals plan to do so
foregoneconclusion said:LOL...the FCC will suddenly provide "clarification" for a law that's been on the books and upheld in court rulings for decades? What a joke. -
Epic sues Apple after Fortnite removed from App Store
red oak said:Epic signed a clearly worded contract. Then, snuck and enabled new payment code in their app. All while working in parallel putting together a lawsuit and PR campaign including the video to be in hand when Apple expectedly pulled the app
At a minimum, Epic is morally bankrupt and has no ethics. Who in the world would want to work for a company that does something like this? -
House Judiciary says Apple enjoys monopoly power with App Store
StrangeDays said:Rep. David Cicilline, the head of the antitrust subcommittee, called Apple's 30% cut of app purchases "highway robbery"
...lol these guys have no idea how much larger the markup is from manufacturer to nearly all retail endpoints. think at least 100%. but even within console markets (Steam, Google, Xbox, Sony, Nintendo), it's all the same 30%.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Cicilline#Controversies
-
Apple's $111.4B Q1 shatters quarterly record with massive growth across all categories
lkrupp said:Apple, proudly failing and racing toward bankruptcy since April 1, 1976! -
Apple's $111.4B Q1 shatters quarterly record with massive growth across all categories
-
Judge orders Tim Cook and Craig Federighi documentation in Epic case
-
Apple's $111.4B Q1 shatters quarterly record with massive growth across all categories
melgross said:SpamSandwich said:melgross said:radarthekat said:cg27 said:Rayz2016 said:Nice problem to have …By removing unproductive cash from the balance sheet and using it to reduce the share count, a business increases the percentage of each dollar invested representing the operating business. And at the same time increases the ownership percentage represented by each remaining outstanding share. As a potential investor you want your invested dollars [capital] to purchase an operating business that produces outsized returns, not static and unproductive cash.
There was a time a few years ago, back when Icahn was carping, that each dollar invested in Apple shares represented only 75 cents invested in the operating business and 25 cents invested to buy a bit of Apple’s cash hoard. Most casual investors don’t think about that. But what if you said to your broker, “please invest $100,000 from my account in this company I feel is a good business” and your broker replied, “sure, but I’m going to invest only $75,000 in the company’s shares and let the other $25,000 sit and do nothing for you.” You’d question his action, and yet that’s exactly the decision that all of us investors faced, and made, when we bought Apple shares back in those days. Get unproductive cash off the balance sheet, and put it to good use.
as long as cash is earning enough to maintain a small positive direction, it’s not non productive. But buying massive amounts of shares back, and then cancelling them is destructive. The company has literally thrown well over $100 billion in the garbage over the years, and accumulated over $110 billion in debt, which is subject to interest. -
Xiaomi introduces first over-the-air charging system called Mi Air Charge