Gorecki

"We dont want the key to your house. We just want you to keep the door open."

sog35 said:

Gorecki said:

sog35 said:

Man if Samsung comes out with a bezeless phone next year and Apple only gives us the 7s they will get killed

Why is Apple so slow with design?  Why can't Apple lead in design anymore?

The bezeless iPhone should have been the 7.

When was the last time Apple was actually cutting edge?

iPhone and iPad were cutting edge. And the Watch to a lesser extent.

Because Apple is the only one who has to produce 1 million units A DAY! Therefore you need to have a design that some manufacturer is capable to make in that kind of volumes, quality and price per unit.

Thats ridiculous.

So that means the iPhone needs to  have the same basic design for FOUR FRIKEN YEARS IN A ROW!

Did I say that? I said that more revolutionary changes, like f.e. AMOLED, edge to edge or curved display and so on are limited by the objective reasons of what is possible now. I can assure you that Apple has many prototypes that would drop your jaw, but there is no one capable of producing it.

And like I have said to you several times, stop commenting on industrial design! You are clueless about it and you just embarrass yourself.

Thats not a car.

And Airbus? Uber? Really?

sog35 said:.

I consider the iPhone7 1 year old phone, or the current model.

The 6s is a 2 year old model.
The 6 is a 3 year old model.

Either way we are stuck with the same design for THREE YEARS.

And if you buy an iPhone7 this year and hold it for 2 years (the average) then in the second year you will be using a phone with a 5 year old design!!! YUK!  That's like using an 3GS when the iPhone6 came out. 

It doesnt matter what you "consider". Facts are facts. 

iPhone 7 is new, not one year old. Your argument is stupid. Complaining that in one year the design will be "one year old" is amazing:)

And like you said, most people put case on it, so you wont see the difference even if you want to.

chadbag said:

sog35 said:

BULLSHIT

They changed the battery and it still blew up.

Did you read the article?  The problem lying with the battery does not mean that a specific battery brand was at fault.   If there was not enough space for the battery to expand, two similarly specced batteries from two manufacturers could both behave the same way.  

But then it is not the "problem of the battery", as they say! 

boeyc15 said:

 no head phone jack on iphone 7--- meh you don't need it or use a dongle/wireless--- but leaving it in the new MacBook Air... um Pro -- oh umm... the Audio Pro's cant use a 'dongle';  reeks of BS to me.

Not saying Steve would have done differently that above(Id like to think so), but Steve Jobs was famous for sweating details and calling people up on Sunday afternoon or middle of the night to 'fix it'... is anyone at Apple doing that kind of sweating and that force changes?

Because in iPhone 7 (and their next portables, like maybe future iPod Shuffle) every nanometer counts! And in the MacBook it simply doesnt. Get it?

And it amazes me how many people know about Jobs private working habits and how it has suddenly changed.

stantheman said:

iPhone "Pro." No other name makes sense.

There is nothing "Pro" about that phone, so your name actually makes no sense at all.

"Pro" means that it is suited for professionals. 

It will be called "iPhone Edition", just like the ceramic AW.

sog35 said:

Gorecki said:

sog35 said:

Gorecki said:

And btw, the problems I am describing arent based on "lack of more advanced technology".

Lets forget the display technology and lets just take the transparent cover. You are unable to connect two transparent materials without the noticable gap. Because of the laws of optics! Because the surface isnt two-dimensional.

Thats basic physics. If you plan to contradict that, well you are bigger clown than I thought you are:)

keep living in the technological past

bottom line is foldable iPhones are coming. Who knows what tech they will use, but its the next step after zero bezel. 

I dont know what tech they will use, but what I know for sure is that they wont use your ancient Nintendo style. Because of the problems I described to you, which you tend to ignore and you just keep blabing the magical mantra of nonexisting technologies and ignoring basic laws of physics.

It would be really funny if I didnt know you are dead serious.

you are the one bringing up Nintendo style.

the 'latch' could be part of the screen. who knows. But your little brain can't comprehend anything beyond what you know. 

What latch ffs??

Again, where is your imagination?

Since you clearly dont have any, take two pieces of glass and put them together. They have some thickness, even if only micromilimeters thick, the light fractures and you see the connecting line!

And as I said, this is the problem even if you would have a totaly ideal scenario with a superfuturistic screen with pixels exactly on the edge of the display.

And that you are able to manufacture a
mechanim that puts two parts of device so close together, that the gap between them is as close as the gap between pixels in Retina display. Good luck:))

This is basic psysics, which you clearly dont understand.

The back looks EXACTLY like the iPod Touch. The location of camera, its size, the flash. Except for the antenna separators. (

Come on Apple, you can do better than this!

Btw, the iPhone 6S is 7.1 mm thick, iPod Touch is 6.1 mm, and still has the audiojack.