Gorecki

I dont think that they will try to improve the battery life with it. It is fine, people usually get through their day with "normal" usage.

But it will give them the opportunity to make the battery smaller and, surprisingly, make the watch thinner! Finally:)

stantheman said:

iPhone "Pro." No other name makes sense.

There is nothing "Pro" about that phone, so your name actually makes no sense at all.

"Pro" means that it is suited for professionals. 

It will be called "iPhone Edition", just like the ceramic AW.

Thats not a car.

And Airbus? Uber? Really?

chadbag said:

sog35 said:

BULLSHIT

They changed the battery and it still blew up.

Did you read the article?  The problem lying with the battery does not mean that a specific battery brand was at fault.   If there was not enough space for the battery to expand, two similarly specced batteries from two manufacturers could both behave the same way.  

But then it is not the "problem of the battery", as they say! 

sog35 said:

Gorecki said:

sog35 said:

Gorecki said:

And btw, the problems I am describing arent based on "lack of more advanced technology".

Lets forget the display technology and lets just take the transparent cover. You are unable to connect two transparent materials without the noticable gap. Because of the laws of optics! Because the surface isnt two-dimensional.

Thats basic physics. If you plan to contradict that, well you are bigger clown than I thought you are:)

keep living in the technological past

bottom line is foldable iPhones are coming. Who knows what tech they will use, but its the next step after zero bezel. 

I dont know what tech they will use, but what I know for sure is that they wont use your ancient Nintendo style. Because of the problems I described to you, which you tend to ignore and you just keep blabing the magical mantra of nonexisting technologies and ignoring basic laws of physics.

It would be really funny if I didnt know you are dead serious.

you are the one bringing up Nintendo style.

the 'latch' could be part of the screen. who knows. But your little brain can't comprehend anything beyond what you know. 

What latch ffs??

Again, where is your imagination?

Since you clearly dont have any, take two pieces of glass and put them together. They have some thickness, even if only micromilimeters thick, the light fractures and you see the connecting line!

And as I said, this is the problem even if you would have a totaly ideal scenario with a superfuturistic screen with pixels exactly on the edge of the display.

And that you are able to manufacture a
mechanim that puts two parts of device so close together, that the gap between them is as close as the gap between pixels in Retina display. Good luck:))

This is basic psysics, which you clearly dont understand.