anoylla

lkrupp said:

No, it’s just you refusing change and being unwilling to adapt.

 I'm following Apple very closely and I'm buying its products from 1988. I didn't even prefer to go to a job if they had PCs. Consider that, do you think all those years I was unwilling to adapt and refusing changes?

 Because of my work I'm discussing Mac and macOS users' matters. I didn't find even one user that is happy for this change.

 Not without reason, the Apple system with system preferences was, yes still was until Monterey, the best way for a Not-A-Nerd-User to have a clear image about to do what, for everything in preferences. Now in Ventura even the strong users are confused.

 I'm still a pro-Apple in everything, and when friends and a lot acquaintances ask me about which platform and computer to buy, I certainly tell them that the best solution is an Apple Mac.

 I see your account and I realize that you are the 'Master Of The Knowledge' (when you don't attack people here). So, could you please give us your lights of knowledge about why the 'Ventura system settings' are better than 'Monterey System Preferences'?
 Or at least why the 'Monterey System Preferences' are worst than 'Ventura settings'?

 Cause if you don't have valid argument cases about that, you are just one of those who blindly follow what a company does, and that everything they do is divine written in stone.

"I strongly dislike the facelift of System Preferences in Ventura. Older is better." I totally agree! If the purpose of updates is to make users' lives easier, then one thing is certain, System Preferences (System Settings in Ventura) has made users' lives a nightmare.

Hey Zuck, take this photo also to the court..

Like when he "competed directly" with his facebook phone..

dantheman827 said:

So Apple doesn't want to pay a fee for selling their product in Chicago...

This sound very familiar... Like Epic not wanting to pay a fee for selling their product in the App Store...

Brain crippled 

red oak said:

Yes, move to Android.  

Where you can enjoy rogue apps, having your personal data tracked and sold, two or less years of software updates, the Fitbit and WearOS shit show, the non-existent Android tablet market, slower CPU/GPUs, fragmented messaging, Pixel perpetual quality issues, app and services bloatware, lower quality 3rd party apps, and worse customer service.  

What else? 

And above all, do not have the enchanting experience of iMessage!

StrangeDays said:

anoylla said:

One of them could be USB-C fast charging?

I wouldn’t put any money on that. Most people charge it overnight so fast charging a watch has little value proposition. While I charge mine in the morning while I get ready, this hasn’t offering any problems. The night stand charging docks are very cool and I can’t seem them switch it to a plug. 

I don’t know, I just tried to guess what FOUR BUTTONS could be used for and according to the new facts, which want the European Union to require USB-C in all gadgets, it could be such a port.  It could also free up the bottom of the Apple Watch for more sensors.  It is only a hypothesis that remains to be seen if it will come true on September 7.  As for whether a USB-C port gives less water resistance, it has been proven not to be the case.