PShimi

About

Username
PShimi
Joined
Visits
11
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
111
Badges
0
Posts
38
  • Apple's A12Z Bionic chip could be a re-binned A12X

    A12X is TSMC's N7 process (fact)
    A12Z is TSMC's N7P process (educated guess)

    N7P is 10% more efficient for power use.
    The 2020 iPad Pro has a smaller battery, an SoC at the same frequency, yet an additional GPU core turned on - but can run longer at top frequencies (Apple said so) and has the same run time (Apple said so).

    This means it must be a newer process, not just better binning. 
    N7P process is already used for the A13 chip - it's not some special delux process.
    The A14X is likely to be N5 for example.

    As for RAM - it is not part of the SoC Eriamjh.

    avon b7jdb8167frantisekGG1muthuk_vanalingampscooter63FileMakerFellerwatto_cobra
  • How to pick the best monitor for studying and working from home

    If you have a laptop but no keyboard or mouse, the very first thing you should do is get a keyboard and mouse, and move your laptop a little further away from you to reduce neck strain.
    The next thing to do is elevate your laptop. Do this on the cheap with a stack of books, or buy a foldable laptop stand. I would highly recommend the Nexstand laptop stand. You can elevate your laptop to various heights, and get the top of your laptop screen just below your eyeline so that your posture and neck are straight. Nexstand stand is cheap, light, compact and portable.

    As regards to monitors, if you are only temporarily going to use a monitor at home, a cheap monitor might be OK, but I personally would (and did) prefer something that I can get good life out of. Acer, Asus and even LG are all pretty questionable. Most Acer monitors at work (all cheap 23.x inch) have broken over the years. Asus seems to be pot luck in terms of getting a good unit or not (just read Amazon reviews). having said that, we have around 6 Asus 24" Proart and they have worked fine (not 4K).

    If you want to get something decent, but on a budget, you cannot go wrong with Dell. Dell as a company is not the first company that comes to mind when it comes to quality, but without doubt their monitors are pretty good. As for size, if you already have a 15 or 16 inch monitor, a 23 inch isn't going to help that much more. I would highly recommend a 27 incher. Further, it's 2020 already, so go 4K - you won't regret it - and you can run the monitor in HiDPI (or retina mode if you will).

    If you have an older Mac Book Pro - be sure to check it supports 4K. The 15 inch Mac Pro late 2013 with dedicated graphics will work - mini display port to Display Port cable is needed (HDMI does not support 4K @60p prior to HDMI ver.2) - I was using this set up with an Eizo EV3237 a 32 inch 4K monitor from 2015 that cost around $2000. Excellent monitor, no problems over thousands of hours of use. The newer version is EV3285 has USB Type C input and costs around the same, but has a lower colour gamut for some reason.

    I have an older NEC graphics monitor from 2008 that still works. An LG 27 inch that cost around $600 but has uniformity and colour issues - used as an emergency monitor, and another LG (exactly the same model bought a month later) that is broken - scrambled screen. LG's more expensive monitors tend to be better tuned and tested, but I feel that other brands like NEC / Eizo that do in fact use LG panels have much better driver electronics, and tend to get the better monitor batches from LG. Eizo certainly really go to town to profiling and testing their monitors (which is the reason they cost more). A 5 year guarantee is pretty good.

    For home I ended up getting an Eizo ColorEdge CS2740 - a new model that came out early this year. It's a 27 inch 4K professional graphics monitor, USB Type C - comes with a USB C to USB C cable, and charges my laptop (2018 15 inch mac book pro). This monitor is colour accurate, the uniformity of the screen is the best I have ever seen. 16 bit LUT 10 bit panel. It is also, quite unusually, software upgradeable (with additional colour tables, I forget the details, but it's the sort of thing you would do for colour grading and that video work). While my work monitor is 32 inch, it felt just a little big. I find 4K on the new 27 inch (at 3008x1692) in HiDPI mode perfect.

    Sorry if this ended up looking like an Eizo endorsement. If you are strapped for cash, do get a Dell, they're pretty good (in the office we have 10x 27 inch 2K and 1x 27 inch 4K which have all been perfect).
    dewmemobirdrundhvidwatto_cobra
  • Apple joins tech companies in trying to halt WeChat ban

    PShimi said:
    The Chinese government reads EVERYTHING that goes through WeChat. Nothing is too big or too small for them to use against people and suppress them. In China, if you complain about the police taking people's motorbikes (in a WeChat group), an hour to two later they will be knocking at your door - stick you in a steel frame chair (with your hands cuffed to the chair) and interrogate you. They won't beat you, but they will threaten to get your family involved if you don't co-operate, say you were wrong, and tell them how much you love the police.

    Let's be clear, the Chinese police is a direct arm of the CCP. The information comes from Tencent, the Chinese firm that developed WeChat (oh, and they copied What's App and a few other apps to do that - then after WeChat was ready, the Chinese government banned What's App in China - just in case you didn't know that - look it up).

    All kinds of sensitive information is shared on WeChat across the world - it doesn't have to be the plans or the data to a secret new something or other - but if it is a password to something (people are that dumb) or information indicating that someone (let's call them 'the bate') is friends with someone high up in a company the CCP wish to target, it gives them a way in to someone or something they want to target.

    Example: An American firm is owned by a Chinese firm, the 'president' of this 'American' firm introduces him/herself to the bate (the reason for the '' is that the firm is not really American, and the president of the firm is no more than a puppet). After a month or two of exchanging pleasantries, they say that they want to invest in such and such a company (the target). The bate says 'oh I am friends with someone in that company, let me introduce you'. This 'president' is then introduced as 'a friend' of the bate, and as the president of an American company. Long story story short, the target ends up accepting a massive investment from the 'American' company without realising that the company is in fact owned and controlled by the Chinese government - because the person making the deal was a friend of a friend they trusted them. Later on, the Chinese government starts twisting the arms of people in this company via the 'American' company to do what they want them to do. It won't be clear to them that they are being manipulated by a foreign power either.

    This scenario is my own writing - I didn't read about this example somewhere. It is simply an example of how soft power works and how the Chinese government creeps in. It is a very simplistic example, but I think you get the idea.

    Using this kind of soft power, they then start leaning on their next targets using what they currently have under their thumb.

    In real life, there are examples of this soft power at work - just in case you have the notion that this 'soft power' is not a serious threat to a country's democracy. The Canadian broadcaster CBC (Canada's version of the British BBC) is under the thumb of the CCP. It is not overt, but every now and then something happens that makes this pretty clear. Example - a Chinese news paper in Canada written by Chinese people in English (and not owned by the CCP, and who are not under the thumb of the CCP)  was delivered en mass to Canadian's doors even to people that didn't subscribe to it. The paper had articles about what the Chinese government had been doing (such as hiding the existence of covid19 when they knew about it at least as early as Nov 2019).
    So what does the CBC do? They did a news program interviewing 'outraged' Canadians who were scared of the 'false information' and said how 'racist' the news paper was (a Chinese news paper written by Chinese people about China is apparently racist? Just you wait, this happens a lot - whenever someone does something outside of China that exposes the CCP - it will immediately be labeled as racist - even if it is not racist at all and is an actual fact of something that happened.)

    Another example is the raising of the Chinese flag at an Australian police station. An authoritarian regime's flag being raised on a democratic country's soil (look it up). How do you think that happened? Soft power.
    WeChat helps them to do this because they can collect information about people (not just meta data, but people's conversations), and they use it.

    OK, so why is Apple supporting this?
    In China WeChat is one of the main payment systems, along with AliPay.

    The US government is saying that not only should WeChat be banned in the US, but that US companies should not use WeChat (is this correct?) I am not sure if this extends to the use of WeChat on iPhones in China to pay for Apps on the App Store (is this how payment of Apps works in China - people use WeChat to pay?)
    Could this be why Apple is against this? I am asking this because I don't know, but I have to think there must be a monetary reason why Apple wants to support the CCP.

    I'm going to ask the question that may (or may not) be on everyone's minds: Is the CCP pressuring Apple that if they do not support WeChat, the CCP will retaliate against Apple in some way, shape or form?
    Because - Apple is all about PRIVACY... right? They drone on and on about it - but we know for a fact that WeChat is NOT about PRIVACY. So how could Apple possibly support this? It does not make any sense.


    As for people trying to say that the US should not ban WeChat because they (the US) do bad things too (so we should keep letting China do bad things) - are you serious? I think that's a poor argument. In fact, I think it is disgusting. It's like saying a guy is raping women every week, but it's OK because this other guy is doing the same thing. No one would stand for that, but somehow it's OK to let China do that?

    People need to realise that China doesn't only target the US (as in the Canada example above) but many other countries. Australia is in deep trouble with China (in order to understand how WeChat can be used, and Apple's position in all this, we need to understand what China is doing around the world, and how WeChat is part of that):

    When Australia wanted to look into the origins of covid19 - to understand how it spread, and how to stop that kind of thing happening again (this is how science works, and it is perfectly logical and reasonable to do this) the Chinese government tried to stop them, and claimed they were being racist (this information is freely available, I suggest you read about it if you haven't already).
    Why would they try to stop someone doing scientific study on a virus that has caused hundreds of thousands of lost lives? Understanding the history of a virus, knowing how it has evolved up till now, helps us understand how it may change in the future. This is standard scientific practice. [EDIT: They did this because they want to claim that the virus did not originate in China, and therefore is not China's responsibility. Scientific data on the virus' origins can pin point when and where it emerged, and the CCP do not want this.]

    They told Australia that if it persisted, China would stop importing Australian wine and other things in retaliation. A Chinese news paper (owned and run by the CCP) called Australia 'gum stuck on China's shoe that needs to be scraped off with a stone' or words to that effect (again, look it up). And this comment is interesting in the light of the fact that China owns vital infrastructure, including Port Darwin, and an airport in Australia. They also have a Chinese CCP member in Australia's government (the member of parliament admitted to this, but claimed they did not work for the CCP anymore - which is highly doubtful).
    They are constantly pushing other countries around - using land and property they own, but also information they have gleaned from WeChat, which is merely one of many tools used by the Chinese government.

    Why would Apple want to support this?

    As an aside (if this part is deemed too political please inform me and I will edit it out - but I do think people need to understand this):

    Covid19 was renamed from the Wuhan virus by the WHO under pressure of the CCP. Why would they do this? Well, not long after China's own CDC (their own experts) said the virus originated in Wuhan, China, the CCP started saying the virus came from Italy (and they also tried saying Japan). It didn't go down well with the Chinese people they tested this story on. This was then morphed into it being from the USA - which apparently did go down well, because (you US citizens know this right?) your nation is being painted as releasing the Wuhan virus (sorry, Covid19) into China to the Chinese people.
    I.e. This is not a Chinese problem, and therefore not the problem of the CCP - so in the Chinese people's eyes, the CCP did nothing wrong after all, and it is all America's fault.
    And, by calling the virus Covid19 rather than the Wuhan virus (which is the point I am making here), it's clearly 'not from China' and the CCP has 'no culpability for hiding knowledge of the virus and allowing it to spread'. Of course, they do have knowledge that flights internal to China were banned to stop the spread (because they banned them), but international flights were encouraged (because they encouraged them) and yes, this is FACT not some nonsense tin foil conspiracy nut theory. It is absolute fact, and absolutely unforgivable. But no one seems to care.

    A Chinese reporter in the USA called Simone Gao did an amazing documentary on this titled 'Coverup of the Century' (you can find it on Youtube). If you have any doubt that WeChat should be banned after seeing this very well researched documentary then there truly is no hope (a common comment on this documentary is that it is what unbiased, free press journalism, is supposed to be). I have to agree.

    At the end of the day, Apple is leaving a seriously bad taste in my mouth.
    I have never ever thought to use the phase "Steve would not do this" but I think I would be absolutely correct in saying "Steve would not do this". What is Tim Cook doing to Apple, and via Apple to the USA on behalf of (it seems, I have no proof, but having thought about what I have written above) the CCP.


    Edited to clarify why China is blocking Australia - see [EDIT] above.

    Some actual evidence would be nice.   All the Trumpers have is conspiracy theories used to distract from their own corruption and mismanagement.
    ....  So far, their evidence consists of:  "We say China is bad.  Therefor everything they do is bad.   Even if it isn't."

    Every corrupt autocracy needs an enemy to distract from their own corruption.  And, in this case, in their politicized zeal, they transitioned from supposedly protecting American business and jobs to destroying them.

    Sure.

    The below contains links that @GeorgeBMac has requested in support of what I wrote in a previous post. Most (but not all) of them do not talk about WeChat which is really what this thread is supposed to be about, but they do support my comments about what China has been doing, and in that vein, how Apple supporting the CCP over WeChat does not make any sense.

    If you are busy and do not have time to look through all the below material, I would HIGHLY suggest you watch this - directly mentions WeChat various times:

    Simone Gao documentary, 1 hour long, viewed over 2 million times - discusses how China hid the virus and lied about human to human transmission, including monitoring people via WeChat and using it as a tool of suppression:



    Very interesting video that covers various topics but focuses on Canada's CBC extremely worrying pro CCP anti democratic news stories calling Chinese journalists racist against China when they were talking about the Chinese Government (i.e. it would be like saying someone was racist for saying the Nazis were bad - when the Nazis are not a race - a government is NOT a race) and attempts to conflate the CCP with the Chinese people which is again helping the CCP:



    How China is gobbling up millions of acres of land, vital infrastructure and companies in Australia
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7725675/How-China-owns-Australia-buying-infrastructure-land-water.html

    How China's CCP has taken control of Port Darwin in Australia for 99 years, a very important and strategic port:
    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-12/why-did-northern-territory-sell-darwin-port-to-china-what-risk/10755720


    Google search: australia gum on shoe china
    About 3,850,000 results
    Suggest this article first:
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/29/chewing-gum-stuck-on-the-sole-of-our-shoes-the-china-australia-war-of-words-timeline

    Google: Australia threatened by China virus
    China's government attempting to use economic coercion to stop Australia looking into virus further. This is in support of the comments I made about how the CCP is trying to remove the link between the CCP and the Virus:

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8264031/Chinese-ambassador-threatens-destroy-Australias-economy-coronavirus-probe.html

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-australia-china/australia-rejects-chinese-economic-coercion-threat-amid-planned-coronavirus-probe-idUSKCN2290Z6

    Connected with the above story:
    'You will feel more pain': China's chilling new threat to devastate Australia's economy if it supports America in a 'new Cold War' (mentions the above stories)
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8353231/China-warns-Australia-feel-pain-economic-punishment.html


    March earlier this year (well before the US was in the throws of Covid19): China Will Do Anything to Deflect Coronavirus Blame - points to Italy as the starting point of Covid19:
    https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/03/30/beijing-coronavirus-response-see-what-sticks-propaganda-blame-ccp-xi-jinping/
    https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3903271


    As you can see, the information is out there. You do not need to look very far to find it. It is not as if you have to join some secret club, have a special handshake, and follow some mumbo jumbo.
    Using WeChat for business communication is a serious danger not only for businesses but freedom in general. Ignoring this threat is like walking on a bed of snakes and pretending that none of them will bite you.



    On to @GeorgeBMac later comments on Trump:

    I said nothing about Trump. I find it strange how people often attempt to inject something about Trump when talking about China's CCP. I don't live in the US. I am not American. I do not really follow American politics. China affects the ENTIRE WORLD. How can you not understand that? This is NOT about Trump.

    That said, your comment about protecting American businesses - well China is constantly draining information from around the world and using it to it's own ends. IP theft is a thing, it is ABSOLUTELY real. 

    China's Harbin Z 20 is a virtual clone of America's Black Hawk.
    https://www.businessinsider.com/china-tested-black-hawk-copy-z20-helicopter-on-advanced-destroyer-2019-7?r=US&IR=T

    South China morning post called "China’s Z-20 Black Hawk lookalike"
    https://www.scmp.com/news/china/military/article/3033088/chinas-z-20-black-hawk-lookalike-and-flying-saucer-concept

    A bunch of fighter jets that are near copies:
    https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/aviation/g23303922/china-copycat-air-force/


    The point is - these are copied from the militaries of the world - who are 'well protected' and yet the CCP still manages to steal their data. Compared to this, stealing information from businesses is child's play, and WeChat makes this even easier.

    So again, what is Apple doing!? It makes NO sense.
    svanstromgatorguywatto_cobra
  • 2020 iPad Pro's A12Z shows little improvement over 2018's A12X in early benchmarks

    rain22 said:
    Well... isn't that just indicative of Apple innovation of late. 


    I think Apple wants to get LiDAR into people's (developer's) hands sooner rather than later, because:
    when they release the iPhone 14 later this year, it would help their marketing if there were apps that actually took advantage of it.

    They tweaked the SoC a bit, presumably to perform better with the LiDAR.

    The RAM speed is curious though. I'd read about it a couple of days back, and thought perhaps the SoC was clocked higher and the stepping resulted in the RAM being clocked slightly lower. But now we see the SoC is the same GHz, so who knows.

    There is another reason for this release - they wanted to sell more units - and if you tell people 'the iPad Pro is great, but hasn't been updated in a while' they hold out. Now we have lots of people stuck at home, that are being told 'there is a new model' - most people who were holding out will probably 'rush out' (online) and buy it.

    I am still waiting for the newer iPad Pro with an A14X in Oct this year. While we shall have to wait and see if that really happens, I feel like it will (it's a feeling, rather than because I read something somewhere). I was one of those burned by the iPad 3, not happening again.
    aderutterCam17davenWgkruegerchemengin1watto_cobrane1aaarrrgggh
  • Lawsuit accusing entire computer industry of patent infringement fails on missed deadline

    chasm said:
    Rayz2016 said:
    Well, the man clearly needs professional help.

    He needed legal help and now he's thrown away his shot, but as the article notes he has in fact been recognized as having created a working microcomputer roughly four years before the Apple I came out.

    You might want to read the article linked from the AI article about him: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/technology/canadian-hailed-as-father-of-pc/article1167114/
    Exactly. Someone that actually created something and then patented it. Not someone that simply filed a patent for thin air, no actual physical product (which is what most industry do to block or slow competition). Patents don't really help protect real inventors like this chap - as is clear - despite the fact he actually got patents.

    Gotta have the big bucks first - he clearly is not able to continue the case without the funds.

    Anyway, surprised no one picked up on "failed to file an opening brief by a July 2 deadline. The lawsuit was tossed on Sept. 1" so it took the courts / lawyers two months to 'process' this? I guess they have a big backlog.
    spock1234auxiokillroymdriftmeyerwatto_cobrachasm
  • 2020 iPad Pro models feature 6GB of RAM, U1 chip across the board

    I too am wondering about this. Despite the time between updates of the iPad Pro - I had expected the update in Sept/Oct this year.
    Could it be that Apple rushed out an update now for all those who suddenly have to work from home? Maybe (but unlikely).
    It is suspect that the keyboard will not be ready till May though. As if they were not originally planning to release it that early.

    Thoughts of the iPad3 come to mind. I remember the iPad 2 came out, and it felt like an improved though warmed over iPad 1. I knew the retina display would be coming, so gave it a pass. Eventually it did - in the form of the ipad 3 - with it's massive back and larger battery. It was the iPad everyone had been waiting for. Six months later, along came the iPad 4 - thinner, lighter, faster.

    I would not be surprised if a new version of the iPad pro comes out later this year with a better CPU.

    On another topic - how do you all feel about the price? iPad Pro 12.9 + 512GB upgrade + wifi/cell + keyboard + pencil = ¥220,000 (about $2060).
    MacBook Air 2020 + i7 1.2Ghz 10th Gen + 512GB + 16GB = ¥170,000 (about $1600)
    Interestingly, Mac Book Pro 13 2019 i7 1.7GHz 8th gen + 512GB + 16GB = ¥230,000 (about $2150)

    I remember when the iPad was significantly cheaper than a laptop. It's no longer the case (for iPad Pro).
    It makes it a difficult proposition to sink that much money into a machine that has the limitations of the iPad (and believe me, I do want one - I've been waiting for this update to buy the 12.9 model).
    The Air config above is likely exactly the same in terms of overall performance to the Mac Book Pro. The Air is not really 'lighter' (something like 80 grams) it is not really smaller (the volume is about the same); the screen is almost as good as the pro, the keyboard is better than the pro (I'm sure a Pro update is in the works), better battery life, though you lose the touchbar. I wonder if $550 is really worth the difference to most people?

    (For those that wonder about the CPU difference):
    The Air i7 1.2GHz option is likely the i7-10510Y (though the turbo boost speed 4.5 single core, 3.2 all cores does not match Apple's 3.8 spec - it's not clear what Apple's spec really means - single core, or all cores, or two cores?)
    The Pro i7 1.7Ghz option is likely the i7-8557U (passmark 10470)
    Can't find any benchmarks on the i7-10510Y even though it came out in Aug 2019... odd. The memory bus speed of the Air i7 1.2GHz is lower than the pros, but the generation is 10 vs 8, so the overall performance is likely not too different that it would make any meaningful difference in day to day use (I have no stats to back this up, because I can't find any, it's just a hunch).




    williamlondon
  • Experts, China warn against Trump's TikTok sale push & 'key money' demand

    TikTok is used by the PRC CPC for soft power propaganda. It's owned by the Chinese government, more or less, and somehow the US president is thinking of keeping it active in the US... for a fee? Am I missing something?

    Even if they moved their 'headquarters' outside of China, the Chinese government would still maintain some influence over the platform.

    This news is pretty odd. If someone has a better handle on this, please do explain.
    Beatsrazorpitjony0watto_cobra
  • Apple joins tech companies in trying to halt WeChat ban

    svanstrom said:
    PShimi said:
    PShimi said:
    PShimi said:
    ...
    Sure.

    The below contains links that @GeorgeBMac has requested in support of what I wrote in a previous post. Most (but not all) of them do not talk about WeChat which is really what this thread is supposed to be about, but they do support my comments about what China has been doing, and in that vein, how Apple supporting the CCP over WeChat does not make any sense.

    If you are busy and do not have time to look through all the below material, I would HIGHLY suggest you watch this - directly mentions WeChat various times:

    Simone Gao documentary, 1 hour long, viewed over 2 million times - discusses how China hid the virus and lied about human to human transmission, including monitoring people via WeChat and using it as a tool of suppression:



    Very interesting video that covers various topics but focuses on Canada's CBC extremely worrying pro CCP anti democratic news stories calling Chinese journalists racist against China when they were talking about the Chinese Government (i.e. it would be like saying someone was racist for saying the Nazis were bad - when the Nazis are not a race - a government is NOT a race) and attempts to conflate the CCP with the Chinese people which is again helping the CCP:



    How China is gobbling up millions of acres of land, vital infrastructure and companies in Australia
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7725675/How-China-owns-Australia-buying-infrastructure-land-water.html

    How China's CCP has taken control of Port Darwin in Australia for 99 years, a very important and strategic port:
    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-12/why-did-northern-territory-sell-darwin-port-to-china-what-risk/10755720


    Google search: australia gum on shoe china
    About 3,850,000 results
    Suggest this article first:
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/29/chewing-gum-stuck-on-the-sole-of-our-shoes-the-china-australia-war-of-words-timeline

    Google: Australia threatened by China virus
    China's government attempting to use economic coercion to stop Australia looking into virus further. This is in support of the comments I made about how the CCP is trying to remove the link between the CCP and the Virus:

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8264031/Chinese-ambassador-threatens-destroy-Australias-economy-coronavirus-probe.html

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-australia-china/australia-rejects-chinese-economic-coercion-threat-amid-planned-coronavirus-probe-idUSKCN2290Z6

    Connected with the above story:
    'You will feel more pain': China's chilling new threat to devastate Australia's economy if it supports America in a 'new Cold War' (mentions the above stories)
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8353231/China-warns-Australia-feel-pain-economic-punishment.html


    March earlier this year (well before the US was in the throws of Covid19): China Will Do Anything to Deflect Coronavirus Blame - points to Italy as the starting point of Covid19:
    https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/03/30/beijing-coronavirus-response-see-what-sticks-propaganda-blame-ccp-xi-jinping/
    https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3903271


    As you can see, the information is out there. You do not need to look very far to find it. It is not as if you have to join some secret club, have a special handshake, and follow some mumbo jumbo.
    Using WeChat for business communication is a serious danger not only for businesses but freedom in general. Ignoring this threat is like walking on a bed of snakes and pretending that none of them will bite you.



    On to @GeorgeBMac later comments on Trump:

    I said nothing about Trump. I find it strange how people often attempt to inject something about Trump when talking about China's CCP. I don't live in the US. I am not American. I do not really follow American politics. China affects the ENTIRE WORLD. How can you not understand that? This is NOT about Trump.

    That said, your comment about protecting American businesses - well China is constantly draining information from around the world and using it to it's own ends. IP theft is a thing, it is ABSOLUTELY real. 

    China's Harbin Z 20 is a virtual clone of America's Black Hawk.
    https://www.businessinsider.com/china-tested-black-hawk-copy-z20-helicopter-on-advanced-destroyer-2019-7?r=US&IR=T

    South China morning post called "China’s Z-20 Black Hawk lookalike"
    https://www.scmp.com/news/china/military/article/3033088/chinas-z-20-black-hawk-lookalike-and-flying-saucer-concept

    A bunch of fighter jets that are near copies:
    https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/aviation/g23303922/china-copycat-air-force/


    The point is - these are copied from the militaries of the world - who are 'well protected' and yet the CCP still manages to steal their data. Compared to this, stealing information from businesses is child's play, and WeChat makes this even easier.

    So again, what is Apple doing!? It makes NO sense.

    I was talking about evidence.   Not propaganda and selective 'facts'.

    We do have hard evidence that Russia has attacked our last two elections and is proceeding to attack this one as well.  But for some reason Trump and his Trumpers ignore that and hyperfocus on China hate.   Why is that?   Could Russia be aiding Trump and China just a distraction?  

    Around 11 different sources - is 'selective'? Well look, just Google it yourself. I just provided suggestions and tried to select from a variety of different sources on purpose to avoid being 'selective', but whatever.

    Australia being bullied by China is propaganda. Um, OK. That's weird. I'm sure you know more than people in Australia do, apparently.

    You clearly did not read my reply where I think I made it pretty clear I don't give a toss about Trump.

    As for China 'hate' - this is getting a bit much. I am deeply concerned about the plight of the Chinese people in China due to what the CCP is doing to them, and what CCP is doing to the world. Everyone should be concerned about this. Don't think for a moment that what happened to Hong Kong is going to be the end of their aggression. Long after Trump is out of power, this is still going to be an issue for the world. It's not going to magically disappear.

    At the end of the day, China uses WeChat to monitor people - Chinese people know that all too well.
    By pushing WeChat to remain in use Apple are supporting the CCP to suppress the Chinese people.

    If you don't want to understand, that's up to you. No one can open your eyes for you.
    He's only in this to protect the CCP, and derail the thread with whataboutisms; so add the facts to the thread for other readers, and then move on. There's no other way forward; all that happens otherwise is that the thread gets muddled to the point where everyone ignores both his delusions and your facts.

    Thank you @svanstrom I appreciate your note, and much agree.
    svanstromgatorguywatto_cobra
  • Epic skirts Apple's 30% commission fee by implementing 'direct' payments

    loopless said:


    Just 3 examples of the real app business world:
    1. Of the 11 apps that I put on the App Store, 7 are loss making, 2 are about break even and 1 is making a nice profit.  This last app is profitable because it is multi-platform and because I can avoid the 30% Apple tax by charging the customer directly. 
    2. If I would only make a iOS version of my apps, all my apps would be loss making.   Developing an app simultaneously for iOS, Android and Web costs roughly 40% more than making it for iOS only, but the revenues are more than double. So the "fact" that Apple is offering me the market I was dreaming of, is a fake fact
    3. One of my colleague app business owners had spent 40.000 Euro in developing a new app, when Apple announced a change in its app developing guidelines.  His app could no longer pass the approval and he went broke 3 months later.   This is the business reality that you fail to understand.
    Like in any other business, an app business owner want to cut costs wherever possible.   This has nothing to do with greediness or stupidity but with normal business practice.

    I don't mind to pay a  commission to any business partner as long as that partner provides the right value for the commission.  Like all developers have discovered, the 30% cut Apple is imposing, does not provide the value it promises.    A survey among my paying customers revealed that none of them discovered the apps via the App Store, they did it via the direct marketing campaign I launch and paid.     Which basically means that Apple has just become a secure payment processor.  The market price of a secure payment processor is 2.7% and not 30%.   No wonder app developers try to avoid the Apple tax,
    .
    What a load of rubbish. Every sale of an app is "revenue" with no cost. The cost is the upfront development. You apps are obviously rubbish and no-one wants to buy them. Don't blame Apple for their "tax" that hosts your apps on the app store, promotes them via search, takes payments and takes care of all the other financials - including depositing revenue in your bank account along with extensive reporting on sales trends across all regions. Plus all the complex issues on sales on international app stores.

    The developer is making valid points. Their argument is well thought out, and reasonable.
    They did not attack you, and abuse you.
    Instead of talking about each point and saying why it is wrong, you smear them with comments like "the apps are obviously rubbish" how incredibly unkind and disingenuous. You have absolutely no clue what their apps are. How can you possibly say that?

    You can sell an application (not for iOS) on a website, process payments yourself, and handle all the apparently 'complex issues' with international sales quite easily. Let's face it, an app is only on international app stores if it has been translated to local languages. And if a dev is doing that, they sure as hell can handle having a website that does that too.

    As a developer I have written a card processing system that a client uses every day. I can tell you that it is near child's play to set up. There is nothing complicated or difficult about it. But, sure, if a dev doesn't want to do that, they'll typically use a Paypal account to handle that - and it works well too. The fee is not 30% for doing that.

    You have completely rubbished the devs points that:

    1. The App Store is not effective in marketing their product. They market their product via other sites, but Apple then gets a cut - for what?
    2. Customers find the product outside of the App Store, but have to purchase it on the App Store - the app must be served by Apple servers because Apple said so. They are forcing the 'we provide the infrastructure' meme on to developers.
    3. Plenty of developers have their own infrastructure; yet they have to use Apple's.

    Of course I understand the security implications of not doing things this way. But here's the thing - there is no reason why apps could not be hosted on a developer's services, and served by those services. Hashed keys used by iOS to validate that an app is what it says it is, is more than enough security. We don't need Apple's servers to serve the apps. If developers that want to reduce the fees they pay to Apple could have this option, and in fact for MacOS apps that have EXACTLY THIS OPTION - apps sold for Mac OS outside of the app store already work this way using notarization, Apple could charge a lower fee, or what ever the fee is for notarization (currently I believe it is free).

    Pascalxxmuthuk_vanalingam
  • Apple warning developers about new international tax impacts to App Store

    chadbag said:
    Because we can buy apps in bricks and mortar stores.  
    Right!!?? They are on a different planet.
    It it were really for bricks and mortar stores, then this would be protectionism. That never ends well.
    This whole thing does not make an ounce of sense.
    watto_cobra