Mr_mime3000

About

Username
Mr_mime3000
Joined
Visits
0
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
18
Badges
0
Posts
3
  • Apple offers publishers millions to train AI on archives

    Xed said:
    jacob_rad said:
    Though I praise the ethical stand point that Apple has taken, doing so will ensure their loss. The data that these companies will provide will be infinitely smaller than the huge mountains of data that companies such as OpenAI and Google have.

    Also, having to rely on third parties will only slow them down. There are claims that regulations will be passed which may hinder companies such as Google which is scraping the internet for data, I assure you nothing like that will happen in the states. Currently, the world is in a race and no country can afford to be behind, no government (barring EU, duh) is foolish enough to hinder this fledgling field.

    Also, Apple is a hardware company unlike Google which is a true software company, they have more areas to integrate and monetise AI.
    Google has more money than Apple?

    Apple isn't a "true" software company is what respect? Because they also design HW?
    Both of them don't have a big difference in revenue generated, I don't think money is a problem to either of them.

    Isn't Apple more akin to Samsung which sells hardware, and makes software to go along with that? Whereas, Google focuses on software and also has divisions such as Google Deepmind which is the leader of AI research, also possessing the world's fastest quantum computer.
    ursues_1williamlondonwatto_cobrabyronl
  • DOJ antitrust lawyers question Beeper over Apple's iMessage hack

    I have seen Apple users more perplexed about losing blue bubble exclusiveness than Android users caring about that, at this point it's quite evident what really anyone wants. I saw someone wanting to sue the federal agencies because they would lose blue bubble exclusiveness if Android users get iMessage at 9to5mac.

    I think the DOJ should investigate in the matter.


    ursues_1williamlondon