jameskatt2

Apple is going to be sending business to LG for its new OLED Screens - after fixing problems that knocked it out of contention for the iPhone X.

This reduces Samsung's share of the OLED business. 

aplnub said:

Anyone know how Apple goes about figuring out the exploit in a case like this?

Apple buys the Cellebrite device.  Figures out how it gets gets data from iOS devices, then develops a patch to close the exploit. 

Apple could also require 8 digits passcodes to make brute force attempts much more difficult to do.

Apple is right to withhold new features such as Apple Intelligence from the European Union
since the DMA would force Apple to give up user's privacy and data.

For example, if Apple is forced to allow other AI platforms such as Facebook's platform to replace Apple Private Cloud Computing (Apple's AI platform), 
then user data is going to go to private companies or would be even sold to third parties.
Imagine all your phone contacts, your passwords, your photos, your text-messages, your credit-card numbers being sold to third parties.

Apple does not have to introduce new features in every region.
Apple already has to block certain app sales in China to comply with Chinese law, for example.
Apple's Private Cloud computing cannot yet be introduced in China since the Chinese don't want
responses against the Chinese Government.

So by using MDM technology, the DEVELOPER can have complete access to your iPhone and its contents and can install apps without your knowledge. 

Obviously, that is a privacy violation - particularly if this gives the DEVELOPER access to your child's iPhone. 

Next thing you know, Child Molesters and Hackers will create apps using MDM technology to take snapshots of your children or yourself in compromising situations. 

Apple is RIGHT to BAN these apps and BAN these Developers for misusing Apple Technology. 

Frivolous lawsuit. 
The lawyer suing Apple should lose his or her license. 

Apple Watch wins because it can be worn as jewelry - at any time, at any event, with any clothing. 
The Fitbit looks only good when you are wearing athletic wear. 

Intel is the main problem.  Intel can't design and build advanced processors quickly enough. They are so slow, 5 year old computers are nearly as fast as current computers.

Apple can't help it if Intel limits its capabilities.  Intel was slow with Thunderbolt 1, 2, and 3. Intel was slow with USB 2 and 3. Intel is slow in supporting fast energy saving RAM. Intel is slow in developing GPUs. etc. 

I run into the 16 GB limit all the time on my MacBook Pro 15" Retina.  I'm a professional - a physician.  And I run 32 apps at the same time including 4 simultaneous backup apps, three web browers with tons of tabs, etc. If not monitored and managed my apps can saturate the file system and literally freeze the user interface.  I have thousands of memory page-outs - which means the Mac is wasting time transferring information from RAM back and forth with the SSD.  Having 32 or 64 GB RAM would be great.

But Intel drags its feet. 

Apple could simply pull the plug and stop the app from working on every iPhone. 

I agree.  For students, a laptop is a far better choice than a tablet.  Even as good as a tablet an iPad is, it simply cannot do what a student needs to get the job done.

When studying using a computer to do research, one needs to multitask between different apps - e.g. a word processor, a web browser, a data-storage/note-taking app, and others.  You also have to store files and organize them.  This multitasking is not easily done on an iPad. It doesn't have windows for apps you can easily switch back and forth.  It doesn't give you access to a file system.

For anything other than drawing, a laptop is far superior to and far more versatile than a tablet.

For teaching computer science, an iPad is worthless since you cannot program on it like a Mac.  And computer science is a necessary skill these days.