larz2112
About
- Username
- larz2112
- Joined
- Visits
- 125
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 355
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 291
Reactions
-
iPhone X-style notch added to LG G7 ThinQ after positive feedback
nunzy said:People love the notch. The iPhone X is the best selling iPhone in history.
-
Apple debuts 5.8-inch iPhone XS and 6.5-inch iPhone XS Max with OLED screens
StrangeDays said:inplainview said:Trying so hard to be excited. It’s just not “magical” anymore. Loads of meh...
"Magical" is in your mind.
FWIW, I've been in the "meh" crowd about Apple events for the past few years. -
Streaming services like Apple Music poised to control music revenue in 2019
melgross said:davgreg said:Streaming is theft.
Here is a tweet from Peter Frampton:
“For 55 million streams of, ‘Baby I Love Your Way’, I got $1,700. I went to Washington with ASCAP last year to talk to law makers about this. Their jaws dropped and they asked me to repeat that for them.“
https://mobile.twitter.com/peterframpton/status/1025584924609400832?lang=en
Do you think Hollywood would take $1700 for 55 million tickets to a movie?Sorry, but most artisits are NOT HAPPY with music streaming services and the extremely low royalties they pay. I am a musician, songwriter, and member of ASCAP, so I keep a close eye on news related to music streaming services. Why do you keep saying that most artists are happy when it simply is not true? Are you intentionally trying to spread misinofrmation or are you just ignorant about what is really going on?If it is ignorance, I would suggest that you do some reading on the legal battles that ASCAP and other publishing companies have been fighting on behalf of music creators to increase royalty rates from streaming services. Read up on the Music Modernization Act signed into law on Oct. 11, 2018. Read up on the U.S. Copyright Royalty Board's recent ruling to increase payouts to songwriters by 44%, and how Spotify, Google, Pandora, and Amazon are all appealing the ruling. Why? Because they know their streaming services are built on an unsustainable business model that doesn't work unless they pay unresonably low royalties. And I would love it if you could produce one example of an artist that is "happy" with the royalties they make from streaming services. For every one you find, I guarantee I can show you 4-5 that are NOT happy with it.And I really wish people would STOP conflating artists with songwriters/composers. That is like thinking actors and screenwriters are the same thing and make their income the same way. Songwriters and composers DO NOT make money off of touring, merchandise, etc. like an artist does. Back when actual records were sold, songwriters and composers made the majority of their money from record sales, and could make a decent living from it. Now streaming services (founded on an unsustainable business model) have eroded record sales and replaced those royalties with royalties that yield far less revenue for the rights holders (songwriter, artist, producer, publisher). So the mentality that, "Oh, they make their money from touring and mechandise" DOES NOT APPLY to songwriters and composers. Their source of income has been decimated by streaming services.In addition, only the MOST successful artists make money from touring and mechandise. The majority of artists do not make much, if anything, from touring and merch, and in some cases they lose money. Large, established artists? Yes, of course they make tons of money from touring and merch. But for songwriters and most other musicians, royalties are a vital part of their revenue stream until they (hopefully) build up a big enough fan base and "make it big". The majority of musicians (artists, songwriters, composers) are not living high on the hog. The ones making millions are the "one percenters".Your comment, "If artists have to perform live, tough!" illustrates that you truly don't understand the situation, not to mention a complete lack of empathy. Songwriters and composers DO NOT make money from touring and merchandise. They are the ones getting royally screwed by an unsustainable music streaming business model that pays royalties of virtually nothing. -
Video: Apple's Clips 2.0 puts you in the Millennium Falcon cockpit with Star Wars augmente...
-
Apple doling out jean jackets plus Metal, iMessage, six-color logo pins to WWDC attendees
andyring said:Interesting on the logo pin. Probably a gay rights thing is my guess. -
Essential's Andy Rubin takes leave of absence after 'inappropriate relationship' allegatio...
spice-boy said:If there are any women reading these comments let me apologize for the men that can only imagine what it is like to be a man, lactk any empathy and think that when a boss or coworker makes sexual advances those being harassed should be flattered. Guys try for second to imagine being at the other end of unwanted sexual advances, and complaining can cost you your job, promotion or being black listed in your profession. If you can't perhaps Apple will develop an App using augmented reality which puts you in an office situation with a boss that makes sexual comments all day and is constantly grabbing at your crotch.
A few years back I was in a consensual relationship with someone I worked with. It was not against company policy, so there were no issues. But FYI, she was the one who made the advances and pursued the relationship. I'm sure the majority of the time that is not the case, but I think we need to remember that when it comes to consensual workplace relationships, it takes two to tango. -
Streaming services like Apple Music poised to control music revenue in 2019
1STnTENDERBITS said:rko said:How does an artist get paid when their song is accessed on Apple Music? How much are they paid per song? I listen to songs on Apple music, but wonder if the artist actually makes anything. These services should maximize artist revenue from song 1. Selling merchandise should not be needed, the music is the merchandise. Artists should be able to earn a living through their work.
And songwriters, composers, and producers do not tour or sell merchandise. Song royalties are a significant portion of their income. One of the major consequnces of music streaming is that it has destroyed the royalty rates for songwrites, composers, and producers. Record sales have been eroded by music streaming services that currently operate under an unsustainable business model. The only way Apple, Spotify, Google, Pandora, can make money is by paying EXTREMELY low royalty rates to music creators.
-
Hands on and benchmark testing of Apple's 2019 iMac 4K
StrangeDays said:racerhomie3 said:Mike Wuerthele said:racerhomie3 said:It’s sad to see Apple not putting SSDs or Fusion drives on these things as standard. Please those who are annoyed by this please send apple feedback & be respectful. I mean even the $800 Mac Mini now has NVMe SSD standard.
Apple.com/feedback
And there are several options inbetween a 5400 rpm HD and a NVMe SSD that they could have used in the base configuration like a 7200 rpm HD, Fusion drive, or a SATA SSD. Yes, it would have increased the cost slightly, but I think it would better reinforce the premium brand perception, at least more so than a 5400 rpm HD. -
Apple Card offers simplified and secure Goldman Sachs-backed credit card with daily reward...
StrangeDays said:6502 said:StrangeDays said:wizard69 said:Soli said:sirlance99 said:hmlongco said:sirlance99 said:Standard isn’t always best when many cards have better rewards than 2%. Also, my standard purchases are extremely low compared to other categories. There’s practically nowhere that I purchase things that I can’t get at least 3% back and up to 5% on most things.
Depends on how one defines "best", doesn't it? The Amazon Prime Store Card, for example, gives you 5% back... with a 28.24% annual APR.
Apple committed to a low (albeit unspecified) APR, with no fees, no late charges, and no penalties. Not to mention the not-so-minor fact that you get your rewards back daily as Apple Cash. Not at the end of the month, not when you redeem them. Daily.
Then there's the secure unique randomized card number per transaction. No number or signature to steal on the physical card. No tracking of purchases. No sales of transaction data.
I don't know about you, but there's a ton of value in privacy and security.
Frankly it wouldnt hurt for our educational system teach students why being conservative in your use of money is so important.
Bingo! The elitist and judgemental comments being posted, i.e. "Maybe you shouldn't buy what you can't afford then" is sad and only serves to illustrate how out of touch and/or ignorant some people can be.I agree that for several decades the middle class has been eroding, and as a result many more people are living paycheck to paycheck. I am fairly certain that the majority of Apple Insider readers, including 6502, Wizard69, and sirlance99, do not have to struggle with living paycheck to paycheck.Because of this, they probably don't understand how difficult it can be for those living paycheck to paycheck to avoid using a credit card to pay for major, unexpected expenses such as car repairs, emergency dental work, replacing a major appliance that suddenly died, etc. And since they are living paycheck to paycheck, they can't just pay off the credit card balance in 30 days. Instead, it takes them months to pay it off, all the while paying interest, and all the while praying that another major, unexpected expense does not occur before they can pay off their credit card balance. Unfortunately for some, another significant unexpected expense occurs and pushes them deeper into credit card debt.So yeah, for those people no annual fee and a low APR matters a lot. -
Samsung delays launch of Galaxy Fold after review unit screen failures [u]