nr9
About
- Username
- nr9
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 182
Reactions
Comments
-
if this is true its certainly very dissapointing. As a student, the only desktop mac i have the money to buy is a mac mini..
-
heh, i said no a long time ago
-
bottom of the line is usually the highest quality get the 999 one,but max out the ram
-
Quote: Originally posted by emig647 Edit: The clockspeed is already leaving 2.5ghz and is 2.7ghz. I'm willing to bet will see 3ghz by years end. I can't even believe this got brought back up. we all wish right? how about: no?
-
Quote: Originally posted by emig647 Where did I misquote you? If I recall correctly, you DID say that the g5's wouldn't break 2.5ghz and you DID state that you worked for ibm? where's the misquote? i invite you to look at my original post reg…
-
Quote: Originally posted by emig647 He claimed he was an insider from IBM though. He claimed that apple would NOT break the 2.5ghz barrier. We went rounds on this one, and I wish he was still around... I believe he made a little bet I am sti…
-
Quote: Originally posted by Henriok Last I heard of POWER6 ultra high frequezy, multi core processor, it was still a Go! The ultra high frequency part is incorrect
-
Quote: Originally posted by Telomar He had no insider knowledge. It was already very well known at the time that every major manufacturer was switching to multiple cores. As an aside they haven't given up on clock speeds they just now realise…
-
Quote: Originally posted by talksense101 Try this for a more geeky discussion: http://episteme.arstechnica.com/eve/...2&f=8300945231 most people at arstechnica don't know shit but just pretend that they know shit.
-
Quote: Originally posted by AirSluf While there was a kernel of truth deeply buried in what Nr9 said, the rest of the histrionics around his prediction separate it enough from this that it bears too little resemblance to give him much if any cred…
-
Quote: Originally posted by Kickaha No, no, one must not question the master. Nr9 is perfect. Nr9 is all-knowing. Nr9 would never make a mistake in either content or delivery. Any perceived errors in Nr9's posts are strictly due to your own i…
-
Quote: Originally posted by Telomar Apart from the fact what you just wrote is contradictory and a non-sequitur the articles specifically state the answer isn't multi-core alone. The problem is every company intends to lower frequencies on launc…
-
Quote: Originally posted by Telomar On an aside that wasn't a sentence fragment, which I doubt you could identify yourself, and you'd find Huzzah is in most dictionaries, even pocket ones. It's an exclamation of delight. 'Cause is actually a …
-
Quote: Originally posted by emig647 Are you serious about that statement? How can you attack other posts when yours have been horrid through out this whole thread. Like the above post claims, you have failed to prove any points related to the cre…
-
Quote: Originally posted by AirSluf Ahhh, finally a quote from our esteemed doomsayer! Huzzah! Yes, that was the first quasi-paraphrased paragraph of the second link's article. A rather nice run-in to the rest of the article that illustrates w…
-
look, he said that cuz he doesnt want to scare away investors and possibly to scare competitors. the fact is, scaling is dead. on the article you linked is called "Chip industry needs a 'Plan B" process technology-wise, plan B does not exist, plan B…
-
Quote: Originally posted by wizard69 Who is ingnoring you? If that was the case I wouldn't have responded at all. What I'm saying is that the current state of the industry as you describe it, does not represent the industry as a whole. I …
-
Quote: Originally posted by wizard69 Look Nr9 your statement that it is impossible is simply to absolute to be respected. Either give it up or stop posting as your are wearing a little thin on credibility. If you have half the experience in …
-
Quote: Originally posted by wizard69 I'm neither defending nor supporting Nr9, I just think he is either misunderstanding something or being mislead. IBM has a problem but I see it as pushing to 90nm to fast and with too little innovation. I…
-
Quote: Originally posted by quagmire This will be my last contribution to this thread. Here is the exact words you said, Hmmm. sounds like you admitted you were wrong. But, then you took the easy way out and say plans changed. How h…