wrldwzrd89
About
- Username
- wrldwzrd89
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 64
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally posted by akhomerun maybe if you didnt steal tiger before it came out you'd have a better copy of the OS that would work better Actually, akhomerun, your reasoning is incorrect. Apparently, some people that pre-ordered T…
-
Quote: Originally posted by naden Yeh but the minute you tie to to Cocoa, you tie it to the XServe for deployment. Not necessarily a bad thing, but that just means another reason not to go with WebObjects and instead pick Cayenne/Tapestry (which …
-
Quote: Originally posted by mdriftmeyer Since I used to have to support WOF at NeXT and Apple Enterprise, let me just say that WOF is not just a PURE JAVA WebApplication environment. It has two version. My wish is that when they hired Bill …
-
I'm still not 100% convinced that Mac OS X 10.4 "Tiger" will be released anytime soon...I'm still looking for public-verifyable signs from Apple before I'll be convinced. The 10.3.9 reports sound reasonable to me.
-
Quote: Originally posted by sunilraman groverat.. i understand your point of view that the Registry in windows is designed for a purpose and there is a way of maintaining and cleaning it. overall in practical day-to-day usage its just too susc…
-
Quote: Originally posted by slughead You're forgetting that longhorn was originally not going to have any backwards compatiblity whatsoever. They're slowely doing away with compatibility. GTA 2 doesn't work under windows XP, for instance. Most…
-
I guess that Apple will have to make some other system change to force the death of Classic. What will that be? Who knows...
-
Quote: Originally posted by Kickaha There's also the fact that with CoreData (aka EOFLite) making its way into the mainstream API stable, a lot of the Enterprise pull of WO is now in the everyday OS release. (Not as scalable, no, but easier and …
-
Look at Windows XP. It has the compatibility mode feature. I'd guess that at least 2 million lines of code are dedicated to that alone (500,000 for each Windows compatibility mode - DOS, Win95, Win98/ME, Win2K). Microsoft is saying they want to f…
-
Quote: Originally posted by neutrino23 Nearly all of the support issues I deal with turn out to be registry problems. We don't see corrupted directories or other kinds of issues. We nearly always see registry problems. One guy turned on the compu…
-
Quote: Originally posted by triMe an update: everything is now the latest version of everything and i've narrowed down the problem to be either in ical or isync. i believe this because syncing ical with my ipod doesn't work either (but i can st…
-
Quote: Originally posted by Chucker Well, as the linked article explains, HFSX may in the future encompass further changes. The emphasis being that these changes make HFSX incompatible to HFS+ (e.g., case-sensitiveness doesn't "play nice" with th…
-
Quote: Originally posted by Chucker HFSX has been out since Panther and is simply HFS+ with case-sensitiveness. It doesn't come with any other enhancements. See http://developer.apple.com/technotes...1150.html#HFSX That explains that then.…
-
Quote: Originally posted by triMe hey there- i have a tiBook and just got a tungsten e. it syncs just fine with hotsync, and just fine with isync, provided i have it skip syncing with ical. if i do that, it will sit there forever, while the …
-
Quote: Originally posted by Jwink3101 I believe that with OS X, if you do the secure delete of the trash then those file are written over and "zereoed." If you just delete, (as someone called them) the pointers are gone. That is the difference…
-
I would gladly buy a 60GB, 80GB, or 100GB iPod - but I wouldn't buy an iPod Photo. That device just doesn't appeal to me at all.
-
I probably won't buy AppleCare with my next Mac and instead switch to buying replacement Macs more often. That means my current plan to replace this iMac I have in 2007 gets bumped to 2006.
-
Quote: Originally posted by spylaw4 I wonder if it will come as standard on the OS discs with my G5 iMac due very early November? I doubt it. All iMac G5s come with a customized 10.3.5 - I wouldn't expect that to change anytime soon (with th…
-
Quote: Originally posted by ClimbingTheLog Baloney. Virtual PC didn't use native endian handling in the PowerPC Chip until the G3 because the 601,3,4 chips didn't do it efficiently. Read it again, Virual PC 1 & 2 used the CPU to handle en…
-
Quote: Originally posted by nef601 copy of a post I made at a bioware forum: ****** The ever reliable Brad Oliver over at the IMG forums notes that h/w graphics acceleration with VPC and OS/X is - "just about impossible given that the ha…