vaelian
About
- Username
- vaelian
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 446
Reactions
Comments
-
anonymouse wrote: » So, are you saying it doesn't matter how bad Google Maps was, that any replacement of it had to be perfect, not just better, or even as good as? And, that you have no opinion on the quality of Google Maps and that it's an irrel…
-
anonymouse wrote: » vaelian wrote: » ... Nope, I don't recall mentioning anything about the quality of Google Maps in this thread, so I wonder how you reached that conclusion (this is another framed question). Just this, vaelian wrote:…
-
tallest skil wrote: » capoeira4u wrote: » Apple Map works like shit here in Thailand. In 3D flyover, some buildings instead of being tall rectangular objects, they're circular domes. And most landscape a hundred miles outside of Bangkok is so …
-
anonymouse wrote: » That's why they put that little, "Edited by _____ - Today at ______ " bit there. Perhaps, but it's still unreasonable to expect ME to look for ninja edits in any of the 320+ posts in this thread, or the audience to read th…
-
anonymouse wrote: » Sorry, but the post you linked to doesn't at all explain why Google Maps doesn't have to be perfect because it's being replaced, so, no, you still haven't explained why we should accept a double standard, or, if you reject that…
-
suddenly newton wrote: » Well at least you wear your double standard on your sleeve. Not all cases of double standards are irrational.
-
anonymouse wrote: » Feel free to put it in "context" if you feel I'm taking it out of context. Why would I repeat myself when you're ignoring the rest of my posts? I asked what it was that you did not understand from my explanations on those p…
-
anonymouse wrote: » Still no straight answer? It really looks to me like you are dodging it. I don't blame you, though. It was a pretty ridiculous thing to write. I wouldn't want to have to try to explain it either. Ask a rational question and …
-
anonymouse wrote: » I'm just trying to figure out what you were trying to say when you wrote, And what did you not understand from my 4 posts following that? anonymouse wrote: » Rewording it and asking you if that was what you meant is a l…
-
anonymouse wrote: » You haven't answered this question yet. I'd have to say you are dodging it. And, it certainly does appear to be the claim you made, but, as I said, I want to be sure. Why would I be expected to answer a framed question? You…
-
anonymouse wrote: » You seem to have that all backwards, but, then, I'm still trying to figure out what you were trying to say previously. Are you just dodging that question, or are you not sure either? I'm not dodging the question at, I even g…
-
anonymouse wrote: » OK, so, you're arguing, that anyone who releases software that replaces existing software (which must have been released first if it's being "replaced", but we'll ignore that for the sake of argument) must be perfect, but it's …
-
anonymouse wrote: » I'm commenting on the post I replied to. You said Google Maps doesn't have to be perfect because it was already released, implying that it doesn't have to be perfect because it was out first, and that Apple Maps does because it…
-
anonymouse wrote: » I fail to see why they would be subject to entirely different standards just because of precedence. Do you have any sort of argument to make other than that Apple Maps ought to be perfect but it doesn't matter how flawed Google…
-
jragosta wrote: » Just as Apple Maps did not replace anything. You are still free to use Google Maps or Mapquest on our iPhone. As I said, any future arguments you may have have already been refuted. This one is not an exception. The version …
-
suddenly newton wrote: » Google Maps isn't perfect either, but they don't have click-bait websites like this one ready to pounce on every defect in an organized effort to embarrass Google. Nor does MapQuest, Bing maps, or Tom Tom for that matter. …
-
solipsismx wrote: » To be clear, you are claiming that everyone running iOS 5.x was forced to install iOS 6.0 and no option to continue running iOS 5.x? No, I said that Apple is forcing everyone to use iOS 6, and they're employing all methods t…
-
anonymouse wrote: » But, what it does not show, is that Google Maps is better, or that Apple Maps is worse. and, as for your point 3, it also points out that Google often returns results for searches that don't, "precisely match the data in its da…
-
solipsismx wrote: » Show me evidence that users were forced to upgrade from 5.x to 6.0. Of course I don't have to do this because I had the foresight to save my SHSH blobs before Apple stopped signing my iDevices for iOS 5.x, but still, as …
-
anonymouse wrote: » richl wrote: » Got a link to these comparisons? Here's one: http://blog.tabini.ca/2012/09/old-maps-vs-new-maps/ Now, do you have a link to an objective comparison, that meets at least the standards of evidence presented…