johnnyw2001
About
- Username
- johnnyw2001
- Joined
- Visits
- 1
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 19
Reactions
Comments
-
iTunes 11 does look like an improvement (finally!), and I'm keen to see it, but it looks like it's going to be at the end of this month.
-
marcusj0015 wrote: » it was supposed to be here on the 14th, is what I read, but I'm not sure where, anyway, is Apple gonna blow through ANOTHER fucking release date? Where did you read that, exactly?
-
irnchriz wrote: » So, you don't like the iOS 6 implementation of iTunes Match which is fair enough, it works fine for me but im not anal anout micromanaging music on my device. And, 17 seconds to load TWO HUNDRED entries (which are then cached) is…
-
I don't understand people who claim that Apple shouldn't innovate anymore. iOS is OLD. Just because YOU can't imagine an improvement doesn't mean there isn't one.
-
So they're going to add the ability to sort your albums by the date they were added to your library, right? This missing feature drives me up the wall! Also it would great to have a choice to listen to one album, rather iTunes automatically going t…
-
Hurrah! Now I can pay for something that every other Smart Phone user gets for free! Thanks Apple!
-
I wonder if Apple introduced their own Street View to their maps application if it would be less "creepy" than Google's? :rolleyes: As someone who has used iOS6 for a while now, I feel I'm in a good position to give an opinion: The 3D maps, …
-
So the judgement stopped South Korean sales of Samsung's Galaxy S, Galaxy S II, Galaxy Nexus, Galaxy Tab and Galaxy Tab 10.1, and this is clear proof of Samsung bribing judges? Okaaay. The loser here are the customers. This insane patent war…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Macky the Macky It sure didn't take Microsoft long to kick this logo to the curb... It no longer shows up anywhere on their site. That's the Windows Logo (minus the 2012) and it was fea…
-
Looks good! I saw a preview of Office 2013 and it seems that FINALLY MS have taken a leaf from Apple's book -- it looked NICE and was pleasurable to use. So many tiny graphical touches. Very nice indeed. Good job MS. The more decent competit…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by muppetry That only helps if you always expect sender addresses to match originating server domains, which is often not the case. You could set your detection software to reject on that criterium, but it …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta Still waiting for you to explain why everyone is up in arms about this problem on iOS. If they spoof the 'from' header, it affects everyone. And when you look at all the SMS spoofing sites aroun…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by muppetry True, but while you can verify the origin, you still cannot prevent a spoofed "From" field with unauthenticated SMTP. No, but your email server can tell if it came from the server it clai…
-
My previous reply, explaining why this entirely Apple's fault is being held by moderators (there's links in it). Hopefully it will be released soon.
-
On an unrelated note: It's also worth pointing out that Email has many anti-spam and verification processes. I'm not entirely sure why everyone is regurgitating the nonsense that it doesn't. Technologies like DKIM and Domain Keys, as well as serve…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta This is absolutely false. You can also spoof the 'from' field: http://www.youspoof.info/textSpoofing.html "For example the sender could specify that the recipient's caller ID shows an inco…
-
[COLOR=red]This IS an Apple/iPhone issue.[/COLOR] There's a lot of weird misinformation in this thread, so let me clear it up: When you send an SMS message, you have two fields. FROM and REPLY-TO. You can only alter the REPLY-TO, and not FROM. The …