tkell31
About
- Username
- tkell31
- Joined
- Visits
- 3
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- -29
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 216
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta You're confusing profits and revenues. Revenues actually continued to increase at double digit rates. I'm referring to the projections for the next quarter where they place revenue growth…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by mvigod I was a 5 year holder of apple stock. Sold not on the earnings release as I thought that was actually fine although the trend is starting to show rapid deceleration. That aside once I heard manag…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by drobforever 1. Yes it's 14-week quarter last year, but the effect on net income should be small (a 1-2 out of 14 increase in net income is nothing major) 2. Reasons like cash, deferred tax etc etc…
-
Isnt the real issue Apple's forecasts for next quarter? 4-8% revenue growth is kind of shockingly low considering the last two second quarters were 83% and 60% respectively. Obviously no one expects that kind of growth for long, but 4-8? Throw in…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by onelungedwonder I've been an Apple investor since 2006. I recently got out of the stock entirely, because of their guidance. Like the article says they've always guided conservatively and so low guidance was…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by herbapou Stock is going down on growth decelaration and margins. This is causing a shift in fund ownership from growth to value. This will provide a chance to pick up the stock at undervalue level…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta AAPL was under $100 in January, 2009. They're now well over $400 - even with the recent collapse. Plus, they've paid out $8 per share in dividends in that time. When did 2 times 2.65 beco…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Tallest Skil I'm sorry, who are you to say what he deserves to earn? Lol, I'm a shareholder how about you? I guess I should have sold when Cook did, could have bought back 33% more shares now. …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta You're wrong. The $378 M is a payout to be earned over the next decade. It's certainly not hundreds of millions of dollars per year as you claimed. Lol, okay so it it was 112 million last…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by anantksundaram That compensation -- almost all of it in long-term options and a few million in actual salary, with the options perhaps underwater at this point -- is a pittance given how the stock perfor…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Rogifan source? True, it's shaky. It's the SEC. Check the filings from 1/12 (sorry dont recall the exact date) and 3/28/12. 2011 was a banner year for Mr. Cook. He was "unrecognized" to t…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by jragosta Don't swear. Especially when you're wrong. Two problems with your logic: 1. Apple could easily afford to buy many times the 9 M shares you are suggesting. If they were to buy 5% of out…
-
Originally Posted by palomine I just want to say that I think Tim Cook is doing a great job. He has been doing a great job for a heckuva long time, all the while never asking for nor receiving any recognition under the long shadow of Jobs. …
-
Sorry to say it, but this is an extremely lame article. Implying that they are going to buy enough shares to materially impact the EPS is misleading. I mean it would take 9.4 million shares to change the share count, and by extension EPS, by even …