tbell
About
- Username
- tbell
- Joined
- Visits
- 0
- Last Active
- -
- Roles
- member
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 3,146
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by tenly Your 4k comments would have been true in 2013 and even 2014 - but on the cusp of 2016 - not so much. Look beyond your own zip code and see what is happening in the rest of the world with respect to 4k/UHD TV…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by PowerMacBandit Hopefully it's more reliable then the Netflix and Hulu apps. I have to force quit the apps every other day to get them to load and every few days that doesn't work so I have to restart the AppleTV 4 to…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by ttollerton Good. I'm really into "The Man in the High Castle." Would be great to stream those through my AppleTV (sans unreliable AirPlay). For what it is worth, Airplay works better on the new Apple TV.
-
brucemc wrote: » It can't be written off, but I still doubt it will gain any more traction than its predecessors. HEVC licensing will settle out in time, as the patent holders will determine it is better to make HEVC the standard so they can sell…
-
SpamSandwich wrote: » As I stated above, Apple provided a direct response to the question to Andy Ihnatko (and if I recall correctly, Ihnatko stated this in a Macbreak Weekly video podcast recently). Jobs once told people Apple wouldn't come ou…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Andrew111 I agree that right now its not for cord-cutters. The content providers are icing them out right now (except maybe CBS). But yeah, once they get enough users, then it'll be for cord-cutters. I would pay j…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Suddenly Newton I am a cable cutter and I have an AppleTV (gen 3) and some of the channels (or apps) operate either with ads (YouTube, Vevo) or as paid streaming (Netflix, Hulu, HBO), or pay-per-view/cloud (iTunes St…
-
This story is lame. It makes a claim, but doesn't provide one example of how secrecy actually hurts Apple when it comes to AI. First, why would Apple write papers on AI? Apple doesn't want to share its findings with competitors. Look at Webkit. Appl…
-
polymnia wrote: » I disagree. 4K is relevant to me right now. All the TVs people I know purchased in 2015 are also 4K sets. The price differential is minimal. This will be a relatively quick transition. I'm an apple partisan myself, bu…
-
boltsfan17 wrote: » How long ago was that? Sync is actually pretty good now. Ever since Ford started making the software in house a few years ago, Sync has become so much better. I haven't had any issues with any of the iPhone's I've owned in my F…
-
wood1208 wrote: » let's me honest. I grew my professional carrier with Intel based windows hardware design for PCs and laptops. But, somehow hardware build quality for Windows laptop is subpar quality compare with Apple's Mabook. I am not going to…
-
rogifan wrote: » Sad to see that Apple support censorship. Tim Cook is all about human rights and values except when it comes to China. I wish American companies would quit letting China bully them around. Companies like Apple have no choice …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Suddenly Newton Who, Neil Hughes? Quote: Originally Posted by bulk001 So those who trashed Sorkin earlier now going to come out and lovingly fawn over the movie? Perhaps your not wired this way, but I …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by SirLance99 Why? Apple got the money for the product. Once you buy and own a product, you can do whatever you want with it. It's pretty draconian if they started doing that. Right. Tell that to Microsoft when i…
-
lkrupp wrote: » There are a lot of people here who don’t like anything Apple. I noticed that. That is odd though considering this is an Apple site . I really like Apple music, but I probably will not auto renew only because I can't see paying…
-
wonkothesane wrote: » Now here comes the real test to see how well Apple Music is doing. I really have no clue what I'd bet on: 10% going for paid subscription? 40%? 80%? Really curious on that one. I guess that Apple would consider 10% a succe…
-
zapf brannigan wrote: » Trash talk isn't productive, even if Sorkin did have a couple of points. While it's easy to delve into word parsing and point out that Cook didn't specifically mention the upcoming Steve Jobs movie, he did broadly disparage…
-
freediverx wrote: » If Cook reads a book or watches a film about Jobs that he feels is inaccurate, then he should by all means call them out on the fact and cite specific details and offer corrections. But it's a different story when he lashes out…
-
freediverx wrote: » Why? First,the film's had universally great reviews. Second, Sorkin is absolutely right. Cook was talking out of his ass to criticize a movie he (and most people) have't even seen yet, and calling its makers opportunistic is …
-
sirlance99 wrote: » That's OK. Millions of people will. I will see it as well. I'll catch it on Red Box. It has to be a Lord of the Rings caliber movie for me to pay box office prices. It is too bad it was based on Walter isaacsons horrible boo…