tulkas
About
- Username
- tulkas
- Joined
- Visits
- 33
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,275
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 3,757
Reactions
Comments
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Hattig Changing the text of the apology. Not putting the apology where they were told to (i.e., they hid it away behind a small link, when it should be prominent on the front page). Not making…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by fredawest The ruling says the statement was inaccurate, which anyone with any kind of grasp of the English language knows is not the same as untrue or incorrect. So why on Earth anyone should provide…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Hattig "The court’s initial order to post a notice was designed to correct the impression that the South Korean company was copying Apple’s product. Apple’s post, criticized by judges today, inserted …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by stike vomit Where did you get your law degree? Ebay? Don't need a law degree to have common sense. Judges said Apple included untrue statements. Find one or STFU.
-
Quote: Originally Posted by RichL Apple DID NOT comply with the court order. There are very specific rules for placement and font size in cases like this. The judge has confirmed that Apple broke these rules. If you be…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Crowley Never happened. Stick to actual arguments and facts please. That would be nice. Care to give it a try yourself?
-
For those that agree with this new ruling, a question. The judges explained their ruling as being based on Apple breaching their order by including untrue and incorrect statements in their notice. Please list for us all of the incorrect and untrue…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Crowley So where are all the blowhards who were saying this couldn't possibly happen because Apple were completely, demonstrably in the right? Good decision, Apple need to be slapped down when the…
-
The judges are taking this personally. No apology was ever order. Apple was required to make a statement of fact in order to dispel confusion by potential customers. They did this to the letter, even pasting exactly the wording that was ordered. T…
-
Browett was obviously not going to last. He was a mistake and no one could really deny that. I think Forstall must have been a more complicated matter. He was reputed to see himself as Jobs protege but without Jobs charisma. Talented and egotistical…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Gazoobee This is my major takeaway also. The real problem is the ridiculous order and I'm not sure why any sane judicial body wouldn't have vacated it when Apple appealed, although the UK courts are …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by lamewing Sigh. No, I don't want the to "wail". I never said anything such as that. I expected them to state that they were wrong in their statement. If they wanted to add something along the lines of "pursu…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Galbi Apple. basically mocked the orders of the UK judge and made a fool of him. Not agreeing with his ruling is one thing, but to bring in other European courts decisions is going too far. This is con…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Neo42 Here's the deal, Apple's post is childish. If you are/were a parent, would you accept this as a proper apology for bullying another kid? "Sorry for calling you a liar Tommy... but John and Jan…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by lamewing Providing more libel...something they should be punished for. If Samsung can be held up by their short and curlies, so should Apple (if and when they make an error...as they did here). It's no…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by lamewing Agreed and they should be punished for this act. It is irritating when adults cannot simply follow the rule of law. In this case, Apple lost and needs to follow through with the judge's decision in…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by ClemyNX That's pretty childish coming from Apple. Why not write : "this is what the UK court forces us to write, but we strongly disagree TEXT remember that we only publish this because we have …
-
Quote: Originally Posted by e_veritas It is not the aspect of quoting the judge's own verdict which is the contempt of court. It is the fact that they were found guilty of libel by saying that "Samsung was a slavish copycat", bu…
-
Nice how they repeatedly embedded the words "copied" and "infringed" in their post. I would like this for the print ads: "While many have have accused Samsung of copying their products over the years, according to the UK courts…
-
Quote: Originally Posted by Galbi You talk like Apple can reign supreme for many years. Remember how Nokia was #1 not too many years ago? The same thing could happen to your love child. Samsung has diverse businesses t…