j2fusion

About

Username
j2fusion
Joined
Visits
46
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
592
Badges
1
Posts
153
  • Coalition for App Fairness originally Epic-funded to assist in App Store legal battles

    Is anyone surprised by this… anyone?
    watto_cobrajony0
  • Bill targeting App Store will harm consumers & app ecosystems, claims think tank

    dewme said:
    I really hope we don't end up in a "race to the bottom" with app stores. I remember a time when we had full service department stores staffed with people who actually could help you with purchase decisions by being knowledgeable about the products they were selling. These middlemen in the sales channel added a bit to the cost but they also added value for most shoppers.

    Apple's App Store adds value, both in terms of establishing a high level of confidence that the app does what it says it does and that it doesn't leave poop skid marks all over you or your device. The moderated review system helps separate the wheat from the chaff. Is it perfect? No, but it's more than worth the added cost we're paying for the apps we buy from the App Store, even when they are free.

    The race to the bottom in other "stores" has left us with Amazon and its sketchy review process, Super Walmarts as a dumping ground for China's wares, Big Box-o-Ramas where you get to play warehouse worker for a day, and my personal favorite, a "Dollar" type store on every-other intersection, all staffed by customer service agnostic people who by-and-large have absolutely no knowledge about what they are selling scanning at the POS checkout. We've saved a few dollars by stripping all semblance of professionalism and customer service out of the sales channel so we can maintain the lowest possible pricing and by building all products wherever and by whomever it's as cheap as humanly robotically possible.

    I'm just not feeling the need for yet another institution that has served customers so well descending into the crappification tarpit that all races to the bottom eventually end up in.  


    You don't have to shop at these stores, there are other ones available with more knowledgeable staff, and usually they sell at a higher markup.

    The difference is you have that choice with retail, but with iOS your only choice is the App Store.
    So when Facebook and others like it move their apps exclusively to an alternative store that does not require Ad Tracking Transparency or disclose how they will use your data, you’ll be ok with that?  Once alternative stores are available, Apple will lose all the power it wields to protect the consumer. All the hoopla over ATT shows the power of a single store. Yes, I know there is no such thing as a benevolent dictator but Apple seems to be building a brand on consumer protection (current picture scanning controversy aside) and the bill as it stands will limit its ability to do so. 
    baconstangkillroywatto_cobraDetnator
  • EU to propose common charger for all smartphones, ignores Apple's protest

    riverko said:
    And why stop with phones? Why not electric shavers etc. I bought two different Philips shavers, each with different connector… that’s ok? 
    This!

    How about all the battery powered tools that all take different batteries even though there are only a couple of manufacturers of cells. 
    applguykestralnadrielwatto_cobrajony0
  • Lobbying group backed by Apple and Google rails against Open App Markets Act

    Trolling is attacking a poster rather than presenting intelligent arguments and discussing.
    Regardless of ideas, the lack of them is the only common point in most posts regarding this matter. There may be people who find this so important they signed up to comment - you are very welcome. This was all very obvious for a very long time now, especially since the Epic attack on Apple. Iv been a dedicated Apple Insider for twenty years now and commenting for a decade, so for some of us this has been widely debated. But again it seems crucial for non-trolls to realize the sheer size and scope of this matter.

    1 - Anti-Trust laws are there for a reason, and we wouldnt have Apple now if they hadnt been upheld before.
    People attacking the regulator approach will always have the option to keep exactly the same phone usage, only further options will be available to the rest.

    2 - Security downgrade claims are blatantly fallacious, when what is being advocated by common sense here is simply allowing the same App Store sandboxing magic to other app stores.
    If Apple simply curates third-party app stores like it does its apps, its phenomenal security will be remain just the same for the former.
    Ok, let’s say for sake of argument Apple can maintain security while opening up to other App stores.  How do you feel about Apples recent ATT change?  What do you think would have happened if there were multiple App stores? Well, I believe companies like Facebook would have flocked to another App Store that didn’t have such a requirement and FB and other companies would continue to track us without our permission.  In fact, a large company like FB would have the resources to set up their own store that meet their business interest.  This is just one example and how does that help the consumer?
    p-dogrob53killroyn2itivguyArchStantonCuJoYYCwatto_cobrajony0Detnator
  • FCC mobile broadband map shows LTE coverage areas across the U.S.

    I just checked and there are many areas in Cape Cod where I can’t get coverage with AT&T even though the map shows it as available. In fact, a couple of years ago there was a shark attack and the follow up incident report indicated a lack of cell service hampered first responders.   With all this talk about enhanced 5G service, I’d just like to have any G service on all parts of the Cape. 
    dewme