ericthehalfbee

About

Username
ericthehalfbee
Joined
Visits
207
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
9,750
Badges
2
Posts
4,490

Reactions

7.4KLike0Dislike322Informative

  • 2025 Mac Studio review: One clear purchase choice for most buyers

    ericthehalfbeeericthehalfbee
    The M3 Ultra is easily worth the price if you’re a professional photographer or videographer.

    Even it only comes out 20% faster, how many hours in a year will that save you? High-end machines always face diminishing returns in performance vs dollar spent. As long as the difference in productivity speed outweighs the cost difference then you should get the Ultra. 
    williamlondonrezwits

  • Apple beats Wall Street predictions with record-breaking iPhone sales revenue

    ericthehalfbeeericthehalfbee
    melgross said:
    I keep telling people to not listen to the negative analysts. Three predicted disappointing iPhone sales this quarter, while two reported very good iPhone sales.

    meanwhile, the stick went down $4.19during the day and is about $4.50 down after hours. I know the market is down today (Microsoft was down over $26, for example), but still

    I usually buy Apple stock based off these stupid analysts. If they’re going to manipulate stock prices then why should they be the only ones who benefit from buying when the price is down?
    Alex_Vwatto_cobra

  • New iPad Pro rumored to debut with M4 chip

    ericthehalfbeeericthehalfbee
    narwhal said:
    Qualcomm and Microsoft will debut Snapdragon X Elite Windows laptops in May that they claim match the specs of a base model M3. I suspect Apple wants to release a faster iPad before then to take a bit of wind from their sails.

    Snapdragon X Elite processors aren’t nearly as good as people think. In fact, they’re quite pathetic in certain regards.

    The idea that Apple would up the release date because of the X Elite is, IMO, ridiculous.

    I also think an M4 only 6 months after the M3 is highly unlikely. More likely is a different version of the M3 more suited to the iPad.
    9secondkox2Alex1Nwilliamlondon

  • Apple makes it really hard for users to completely stop it from collecting data

    ericthehalfbeeericthehalfbee
    Data that leaves your iPhone doesn’t mean it’s being “collected” by Apple. The article even mentions services like Continuity that require data to be transferred so devices can work together.

    Further, data that leaves your device and goes to Apple doesn’t mean it’s being abused (like used for targeted ads).

    There’s also a huge difference between data going to a company like Apple and someone like Meta or Google who make 98/80% of their revenue from targeted ads. They need your data to survive. To Apple your data isn’t even pocket change.
    OferAlex1NAlex_VMplsPjas99watto_cobraMacPro

  • US DOJ attacks nearly every aspect of Apple's business in massive antitrust suit

    ericthehalfbeeericthehalfbee
    "For years, Apple responded to competitive threats by imposing a series of 'Whack-A-Mole' contractual rules and restrictions that have allowed Apple to extract higher prices from consumers, impose higher fees on developers and creators, and to throttle competitive alternatives from rival technologies," the DOJ antitrust division chief Jonathan Kanter also said.


    Considering Apple has reduced fees over the years (15% small devs, 15% recurring subs, 0% for subs outside The App Store like Spotify or Netflix) I’m not sure how this idiot can make the claim Apple is imposing higher fees. Fees were their highest in 2008 when everyone paid a flat rate of 30%. Apple has also relaxed or eliminated many other rules over the years. He’s going to have a touch time proving any of this.

    Jonathan Kanter is biased against big tech and has faced criticism because of it. Filing a lawsuit against Apple based on feelings instead of facts is not going to turn out well.

    In the US being a monopoly isn’t illegal (if the iPhone gets declared a monopoly). It’s only illegal if A) you did something illegal to get to your monopoly position or B) once you become a monopoly you start abusing your position.

    Neither is true for Apple. They became large by selling superior products that people want, not by limiting competition or anything similar. Apple also can’t be accused of abusing their position as evidenced by their lowering of fees and relaxing rules over many years. That’s the opposite of abuse of monopoly position.

    DOJ is going to look like fools trying to claim Apple abused their position when lawyers start to list off alt he things Apple has done (like reducing fees). 
    thtKierkegaardenwilliamlondondavgregbaconstangwatto_cobra