entropys
About
- Username
- entropys
- Joined
- Visits
- 190
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 7,981
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 4,482
Reactions
-
Apple's C1 modem breaks no records for speed, but is exceptionally power efficient
-
Apple faces fresh legal attack over its carbon neutral Apple Watch claim [u]
It is the change in total carbon captured in a forest that matters for the purpose of this exercise. The measurement of that increase would be what credits Apple is claiming, and has paid good money for. And if the forest burned down the carbon company would have to cough up the credit value, not Apple.
That completely leaves aside how manipulated and subject to well, “subjective” interpretation a lot of emissions and carbon capture measurement really is. In my role we spend a lot of time trying to find ways of providing opportunities for farmers to sell carbon credits, including reforestation. In truth reforestation, particularly eucalyptus based, is high risk for the farmer if it burned down. Soils carbon trading is also highrisk depending on when the original measurement is made and then when subsequent audits occur. Rainfall is a key driver of soil carbon. In drought prone areas like my country, if the baseline measurement occurred in a wet year, and then the audit in the middle of a drought, the farmer would end up having to repay a lot of credits right when their finances are stretched.
And to this day the EU has had the box seat in determining how it is measured (it’s the forever bureaucrats there that really run the show, not having to worry about ephemeral politicians) which quite coincidently (I am sure, snort) favours the EU economically compared with its transatlantic competitor or even countries such as Australia.But I am sure these projects listed are a lot more credible than your common garden variety type of say, African project that my close email friend colonel Mbuti from Nigeria has to sell to the benefit of even little old me. -
iPhone 16e vs iPhone 16: A new Apple Intelligence-powered entry-level option
nubus said:Harrytro said:$499 would have made more sense to make it easier for more people to afford a brand new iPhone. -
iPhone 16e doesn't have MagSafe
-
How to use Starlink with iPhone & how to disable it if you don't want it