entropys
About
- Username
- entropys
- Joined
- Visits
- 190
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 7,981
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 4,482
Reactions
-
Meta leans on iMessage being more popular than Facebook Messenger for antitrust defense
-
Apple Vision Pro 2: What the rumor mill sees coming, and when it might arrive
-
Apple's high storage prices may be key to mitigating iPhone 17 Pro price rises
-
Behind the scenes, Siri's failed iOS 18 upgrade was a decade-long managerial car crash
sigma902 said:“My pet hypothesis is that Siri was Scott Forstall’s baby. He pushed for the acquisition of SRI or Siri and lead the integration of it into iOS. After Forstall was fired, nobody wanted it and Apple only did the minimum to keep it going as a feature in their products. There wasn’t anyone in leadership to push it forward.”
I recall Forstall as being a proponent, as well. However, a year after Apple announced Siri, I attended a talk by the Entrepreneur in Residence at SRI for the project. He related that Steve Jobs called him personally to express interest in Apple acquiring the technology and doing a deal.And after that well, the focus was subsequently all on maximising margins in the supply chain, an unrestrained Ive, and software with a back seat. -
Apple's high storage prices may be key to mitigating iPhone 17 Pro price rises
I think it fair to say that the USA has contributed far, far more to the ledger than Western Europe. There are tens of thousands of yank dead in European cemeteries that suggest otherwise. As a distant observer, I would suspect that Europe resents that, as it does resent all uppity former colonies that have done well. But the USA most of all.
my own country just has the general 10% tariff applied, so I reckon we won’t notice it. The risk for us is our massive trade surplus with China (that surplus means China has us by the short and curlies), the reverse situation for China with the USA (which will have China by the short and curlies). If China contracts and stops buying our minerals, well….