melgross
About
- Username
- melgross
- Joined
- Visits
- 127
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 10,978
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 33,723
Reactions
-
Leaked Apple Silicon roadmap hints at new Mac Pro, MacBook Air
k2kw said:lkrupp said:DAalseth said:Makes me eager to see what the next gen M series iPads do.22july2013 said:Kuyangkoh said:Will Apple make those high end Mac in US? Or made in usa simply just a PR a while back!!! -
Memory leaks in macOS Monterey plague small number of users
-
Apple delaying new MacBook Pro pre-orders, no warning devices wouldn't arrive today
shareef777 said:My BTO 16” MBP M1 Max w/ 32core gpu, 64gb ram still shows 11/18-11/26. Sadly it showed a November delivery immediately after the store opened when I changed any default config. So seems that the 32core gpu M1 Max was always planned to be a delayed item. Even now, every base model, except for that one, shows as available for pickup today from my local Apple Store. Either they didn’t plan on having that particular config available day one, or they vastly underestimated the number of people that would opt for the higher chip.
im sure it’s more than just we two. -
Apple facing another lawsuit claiming media purchase buttons are misleading
There is not a single thin in that “license” that states that Apple, or any other entity has the right to cancel a legitimate purchase. It’s the standard license stating that while it’s yours, this is what you can and can’t do with it.
bjt there’s a problem between “buying” a material work, such as a CD, and “buying” a digital representation of that work. When you buy a physical work, it’s understood that you are buying the media, and licensing the work itself. But when you are told you are buying a digital representation, then that meaning changes. Now, you’re being told your buying the work itself, and that’s a problem. Companies shouldn’t use the term “buy” if they mean license. The two are different terms with different meaning. Courts often regard the commonly accepted meaning as the correct one to the consumer.
bjt I accept the concept that we can’t sell copies of what we’ve “bought”, or give them away. No problem there. But when they remove something from the catalog, and tell you it’s no longer available in the store, so that you can’t use it, even if you choose to not delete it, then that’s wrong. -
Apple facing another lawsuit claiming media purchase buttons are misleading
As much as I hate to say it, I can’t really disagree with this one. I’ve bought books that no longer work, because they were 32 bits. A great Ansel Adams book, and that one really annoyed me. Most of these books were written as apps which was very common a few years ago. Some still are, I think. Almost all have disappeared. I had a couple dozen. As we all know with media, particularly books, popularity varies greatly. If not enough are sold, the developer abandons them, much as publishers stop publishing them. But at least the paper copy doesn’t disappear.
there are other reasons as well. A copyright may no longer allow a region, for example. There needs to be a way these things are grandfathered in, including something that theoretically won’t work. Somehow, these things need to be in some universal wrapper so they can be used in perpetuity.