foregoneconclusion
About
- Username
- foregoneconclusion
- Joined
- Visits
- 248
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 10,790
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 3,047
Reactions
-
Oppo Find N5 foldable phone review: Apple's now on notice
22july2013 said:Next: trifold phones. -
Apple's Epic gamble: birthright citizenship ruling cited to overturn antisteering mandate
One of the Supreme Court's more goofball rulings that ignores over 100 years of legal precedent. SC itself issued the first nationwide injunction back in the early 20th century and federal courts began issuing them a couple of years after that. Class action status was NEVER a requirement. So the 2025 SC is basically claiming that ONLY the SC has the authority to issue nationwide injunctions without class action status despite the fact that nationwide injunctions were never used by ANY court in the U.S. prior to the early 20th century. Quite the convenient timeline cherry-picking by the SC and it completely ignores what "federal" actually means when it comes to the court system. -
EU backs down on Big Tech tax ahead of US trade deal
-
Apple leaders join Sun Valley billionaires' summer camp for 2025
anthogag said:This event is where they plot and devise ways to use AI to replace humans. -
Trump trade admin calls Apple's China ties a 'Silicon Valley soap opera'
The Trump administration is lying about wanting domestic manufacturing to increase. They have increased the costs for American manufacturers by levying tariffs across the board on materials and parts that are imported. Increasing costs will not make companies more eager to manufacture here. In reality, the Trump administration is doing its best to sabotage U.S. manufacturing.