kkqd1337

I don't understand the attraction of a battery powered doorbell. Unless it was REALLY impossible to run power to one. But is that ever really the case? Just spend some money and get a power line run to it. One expense will save you a lifetime of pain.

Recharging your doorbell seems like an unnecessary hassle to me.

iobserve said:

kkqd1337 said:

iobserve said:

kkqd1337 said:

Disappointed in Apple here. They should have stood up to the UK Government and just said no. 

If you're "disappointed in Apple here" you clearly don't understand the subject. Go re-read

the other alternative would be to make a backdoor to all iPhone end to end encryption in the world and tell no one about it. That's what you'd rather them do? No, you just didn't read carefully. 

I seriously mean it 

Apple should have just had the balls to say no. Need some brinkmanship. 

Ball would then be in the UK government court to see what they would actually do.

What could they do? Fine? Don’t pay. Ban Apple ? Would never happen. 

Ok then- you want them to be jailed for contempt of a direct legal order... that's one hell of a sacrifice you're willing to make for someone else. 

And where is your true outrage at meta/whatsapp and all other messaging platforms that have just gone along with the order, allow the UK to snoop on its people globally, and have said nothing? Or you think Apple should just join them and give the UK a global back door to E2EE?

With great power comes great responsibility 

All of these companies should just leave E2E encryption activated, and obviously refuse a backdoor….

This would then force the UK government into a corner. Are they then seriously gonna start jailing executives like China? It would be interesting and a smart move from Apple etc to see if the UK would actually do that. 

iobserve said:

kkqd1337 said:

Disappointed in Apple here. They should have stood up to the UK Government and just said no. 

If you're "disappointed in Apple here" you clearly don't understand the subject. Go re-read

the other alternative would be to make a backdoor to all iPhone end to end encryption in the world and tell no one about it. That's what you'd rather them do? No, you just didn't read carefully. 

I seriously mean it 

Apple should have just had the balls to say no. Need some brinkmanship. 

Ball would then be in the UK government court to see what they would actually do.

What could they do? Fine? Don’t pay. Ban Apple ? Would never happen. 

Disappointed in Apple here. They should have stood up to the UK Government and just said no. 

I think the price conscious would choose a lower price vs FaceID and AI.

And also, for your average use, AI really is a junk feature.

Whatever Apple say I feel like I am being used as a free trainer for their AI