appleabuser
About
- Username
- appleabuser
- Joined
- Visits
- 15
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 38
- Badges
- 0
- Posts
- 38
Reactions
-
Please don't wish for a 'free' App Store
ranson said:It's not about who shouts loud enough. It is about which government agency is going to reign in Apple first, and force them to permit freedom of choice on devices that their customers own. My bet is that the EU will move first, and it will happen in the next 6-9 months. The handwriting is on the wall and there will ultimately be no alternative for Apple. The resistance between now and that time is simply a delay tactic and Apple knows it.
If you own it, you should be able to do whatever. I fear the outrage culture here will have governments forcing Apple to change and appease, and it will be great for some, but terrible for many, many others.. Entitlements is alive and well. -
Please don't wish for a 'free' App Store
OutdoorAppDeveloper said:This is why iOS needs a "Pro Mode". Users who want a safe app environment can stick with the Apple moderated App Store while users who do not want any restrictions can switch to pro mode and install any app store they want free of Apple's SDK restrictions. Pro mode users would be responsible for their own security and should expect malware, apps that drain the battery in the back ground and so on (just like on laptop and desktop computers). They would also be able to install anti-malware apps as well as the professional tools they need to get work done. Personally, I would stick with the safe mode on my main iPhone and use pro mode on older devices and my iPad.
This is about personal choice and personal responsibility. Greater power and greater responsibility for the users that need it. Greater safety for users that don't.
You have a choice if iOS doesn't work for you; Android. Lot of choice and openness there. -
Please don't wish for a 'free' App Store
Your last point is the problem.
Folk won't take responsibility for what they install from places outside the Apple ecosystem. They'll want Apple to fix their phones that they've installed god-knows-what from god-knows-where. They'll take to Twitter and complain that the battery life of their phone has halved since they've installed a piece or software that Apple has never seen and has no visibility over. They will not be able to prevent folk from installing cracked and insecure profiles that lay the platform open to malware.
Seriously, there are other phones out there which allow you to install whatever you want. If Apple doesn't want to do that then I can't see why they should be forced to.BINGO! As it is, they complain and everything is a "gate." Too many people I know on Android fall for the 'free' pirated stuff they side load from an article, or a friend, or a son/daughter doing for a parent, and then complain about the problems caused by it. There is a pro mode on iOS and it is called developer program, and for large companies, enterprise certificates. -
Please don't wish for a 'free' App Store
ranson said:Owners of an iPhone should be able to install whatever software they want on it, without fear of their warranty for the hardware being voided. Apple impeding that ability (and bloggers discouraging it) is not a Good Thing. Certainly people should install software at their own peril, but adults who own their devices should not have someone else dictate that for them. -
US Justice Department allegedly wants new spinoff carrier as condition of Sprint & T-Mobil...
While it would be nice to have a 4th national carrier, if the government was truly serious about that, it might want to see if Verizon and AT&T would want to (or maybe be forced to?) contribute to it as well, given that a combined T-Mobile and Sprint would still have fewer subscribers than either of the top two. Handcuffing the 3rd and 4th carrier only prolongs the strength of nos. 1 and 2.