k2kw
About
- Username
- k2kw
- Joined
- Visits
- 287
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,493
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 2,084
Reactions
-
iPhone 16e vs iPhone SE 3: A quantum leap forward
-
New iPhone 16e offers Apple Intelligence at a low price point
Ennio said:I have had the original iPhone SE since the beginning. I’ve purchased a second one for more memory and spare parts. I’ve replaced the battery, screen, Touch ID. Realizing the small form factors were going out of fashion, I then purchased the iPhone Mini 12, didn’t use it much. Turned it in for a 13 that I am just now starting to use as my main device. After seeing Apple’s new iPhone 16e, I purchased a second iPhone mini 13 with more memory. I really have never been interested in the fascination surrounding the bigger is better mentality. I wonder how many more years it will take before a phone is obsolete? -
New iPhone 16e offers Apple Intelligence at a low price point
hopestillflies said:How long can I expect to still get OS updates for my 12 mini? Looks like I’m gonna be hanging on for as long as I can. -
New iPhone 16e offers Apple Intelligence at a low price point
charlesn said:Just... wow. I'm kind of stunned. The phone, itself, is pretty much as expected. But that price point... YIKES. So the cheapest iPhone is now 40% more expensive than it was yesterday. Although, in an apples to apples comparison -- price of SE 3 128 vs 16E base model 128 -- it's a 25% hike. I'm not saying the 16E isn't worth it, fhe list of improvements over the SE is huge, but raising the price of entry into the iPhone ecosystem by 40% is a giant cojones pricing move. I'm certainly not going to question the decision, since I'm sure it was made with a ton of data supporting that this would work out okay, but I never saw this coming.
I would have liked a 5.5 screen size that comes for $499. That would have made a reasonable replacement for SE.
Apple should be putting in Basic research for solid state batteries. I want a Pro or Flip iPhone with SS batteries to make it lighter. That’s the one big innovation I’m waiting for. I’m still wondering if AI is worth upgrading for. -
US Department of Justice considering a break-up of Google after monopoly ruling
avon b7 said:There is no doubt in my mind that all the so-called 'Big Tech' companies have harmed consumers in one way or another.
Often it has been through a process of cordoning off users or walling them in or colluding amongst themselves to protect their 'gatekeeper' status.
For example, Google paying Apple for hi default search status might well be considered as collusion to protect interests at the expense of others.
Without doubt there has also been Big Tech overreach too, so it's ironic to see Google claiming that from the DoJ (even if it does turn out to be government overreach).
Now Big Tech is on a potentially Big Hook for a range of different reasons.
The question is if they can wiggle off it and how.