22july2013
About
- Username
- 22july2013
- Joined
- Visits
- 146
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 7,543
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 3,846
Reactions
-
All iOS VPNs are worthless and Apple knows it, claims researcher
-
Apple is just getting started with Apple Silicon
Apple's market penetration of the PC marketplace has been stuck under 10% for over 25 years. One way Apple tried to remedy this in the 1990s was to grant licenses to other companies to build Mac clones.WIKIPEDIA: From early 1995 through mid-1997, it was possible to buy PowerPC-based clone computers running Mac OS, most notably from Power Computing and UMAX. However, by 1996 Apple executives were worried that high-end clones were cannibalizing sales of their own high-end computers, where profit margins were highest.[18]A total of 33 companies made Mac clones, fully licensed. Apple could take this approach again if it wants to crack the 10% market penetration of MacOS. There's no need for anyone to ridicule me for suggesting this, as I'm already sure nobody will agree with me that Apple should try this again. However what's different this time around is that many countries are hassling Apple for not allowing competition on their devices, and if Apple licensed other manufacturers to build hardware clones and/or to replace the OS on Apple's devices, that would likely reduce the cries of "monopoly."
-
Doomed if it does, doomed if it doesn't -- Apple will keep beating expectations
You can look up on wikipedia the "Monte Carlo Fallacy" which says that people will think a change is "due" so if, in roulette, for example, the colour red comes up 10 or 20 times in a row, people will bet lots of money that it will come up black on the next roll, even though history does not affect the future when it comes to games of chance.
It's the same thing with Apple's profits. People see all this money pouring in, and they think it has to end someday. So they predict gloom and doom, for no other reason than Apple's recent string of successes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler's_fallacy#Monte_Carlo_Casino <--Gambler's fallacy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The gambler's fallacy, also known as the Monte Carlo fallacy or the fallacy of the maturity of chances, is the incorrect belief that, if a particular event occurs more frequently than normal during the past, it is less likely to happen in the future (or vice versa), when it has otherwise been established that the probability of such events does not depend on what has happened in the past. Such events, having the quality of historical independence, are referred to as statistically independent. The fallacy is commonly associated with gambling, where it may be believed, for example, that the next dice roll is more than usually likely to be six because there have recently been fewer than the usual number of sixes.
The term "Monte Carlo fallacy" originates from the best known example of the phenomenon, which occurred in the Monte Carlo Casino in 1913 -
Eve launches new HomeKit motion sensor with Thread, light triggers
macgui said:Looks very similar to Hue's motion sensors. It's currently available from Amazon and at $40 it's $10 cheaper than the original Hue motion sensor and the same price as Hue's newer version.
However Eve billed me 22 hours ago and I still haven't seen a notice that they have shipped it yet. I thought companies only billed after they shipped. -
Apple lands upcoming film 'Causeway' starring Jennifer Lawrence