22july2013

About

Username
22july2013
Joined
Visits
146
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
7,543
Badges
2
Posts
3,846
  • Apple updates Pages, Keynote, and Numbers for the first time in six months

    jony0 said:
    recordable macros too would be nice for the whole suite. 
    I agree, but I manage to do that using the third party app Keyboard Maestro.
    Alex_Vwatto_cobra
  • Apple, Netflix bail out of bidding war for Will Smith biopic amid controversy

    Apple TV+ also distributes the movie Hala, which I've uncovered was co-produced by Will Smith's company, Overbook Entertainment. That makes me wonder whether Apple will take action on this movie, too, or let this one slide.

    A lot of A-list actors, including Will Smith, start their own production companies to help themselves secure big roles and top billing. Will Smith made Overbook Entertainment which helps him in these regards. In 2019 Will Smith and his wife formed another company, Westbrook Inc, which apparently does much the same thing, but is now a parent company of Overbook. National Geographic has first dibs on Westbrook films, which is odd, and I wonder if NatGeo will cancel their arrangement now.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overbrook_Entertainment <--
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westbrook_(company) <--


    d_2watto_cobra
  • Russia's top tech giant is harvesting data from millions of iOS users

    gatorguy said:
    mac_dog said:
    How is this any different than the means google and Facebook or “Meta” (stupid name) collect our data, then sell to the highest bidder? 
    I wonder if governments like China and Russia create shell companies and buy data from "legitimate" companies like FaceBook or Google. If so, I don't really blame FaceBook/Google for directly "aiding the enemy," but it sure looks bad on them, and will cost them business if they are caught. How carefully do they vet data purchasers?
    "Do you still beat your wife?"

    Google doesn't sell user data, so the question itself is without merit.
    I recommend you educate yourself, for example: 
    Even though companies like Facebook and Google aren’t directly selling your data, they are using it for targeted advertising, which creates plenty of opportunities for advertisers to pay and get your personal information in return.
    The simplest way is through an ad that links to a website with its own trackers embedded, which can gather information on visitors including their IP address and their device IDs. 
    Advertising companies are quick to point out that they sell ads, not data, but don’t disclose that clicking on these ads often results in a website collecting personal data. In other words, you can easily give away your information to companies that have paid to get an ad in front of you.
    ...
    “You can say, ‘Hey, Google, I want a list of people ages 18–35 who watched the Super Bowl last year.’ They won’t give you that list, but they will let you serve ads to all those people,” Cyphers said. “Some of those people will click on those ads, and you can pretty easily figure out who those people are. You can buy data, in a sense, that way.” 


    CelticPaddyjony0watto_cobraKha0ss
  • Apple TV+ original film 'CODA' wins Best Picture at the 2022 Oscars

    In related news, Netflix got a Best Director Oscar. Another win for streaming companies. This article should have mentioned Netflix.
    lkrupp
  • EU will force Apple & Google to allow third-party app stores, payment services

    avon b7 said:
    davidw said:
    avon b7 said:
    avon b7 said: Not allowing other stores to exist, is. 
    That's obviously not true from a standard legal perspective. The EU wouldn't be resorting to the use of market cap otherwise. They know that trying to apply this new regulation across the board would be a disaster.
    If it isn't legal Apple would have no issues challenging that aspect.

    The market cap is relevant to gatekeeper status.

    It could easily be argued that what allowed Apple and others to get this far unchallenged was precisely that, in the beginning, it wasn't such an issue. 

    As more and more people switch to a more 'digital' lifestyle, the more important these situations have become and solutions for them found. 

    Legislation is always behind the curve in the technology race. Data protection is a prime example but eventually, things get tackled. 
    Gee, wouldn't you think that if this were true and there's really no doubt that it is, that the EU should be more concern about more important issues like security and privacy on the devices we're all using more of in our "digital lifestyle". Rather than to concentrate on forcing Apple into allowing the installation of apps for iOS users, going against Apple claim that such features would comprise security and privacy on their iDevices?

    Wouldn't you say that the EU focusing on allowing third party app stores and side loading, without considering security and privacy issues, as being.....  behind the curve in the technology race? Don't you think that the "data protection" aspect of allowing third party stores and side loading, should be tackled first, instead of .... will eventually get tackled, after our data have already been stolen or held for ransomware by being scammed into installing a malicious app. Google haven't even completely tackled the problem yet and they been working over 10 years at it. Not everyone that are living a "digital lifestyle", are tech savvy.

    Apple developed iOS from the ground up, with security, privacy and data protection in mind. So now Apple should be punished by the EU for being ahead of the tech curve? 
    Take a look at reality. Most apps are not iOS apps. Security works just fine for the vast majority of users. Thanks in large part to EU directives which are already in force, like PSD2.

    This new proposal actually covers a lot of bases and user online security and privacy are major elements. 
    So you don't think the free market should decide how much privacy or security is available to users? You want to dictate to all companies, not just Apple, what feature sets that they must use? Just admit it, you don't believe in market freedom.

    If there was a poll and if the vast majority of Apple users liked Apple's current set of features, you would still want to force Apple to follow your dictates? User satisfaction means nothing to you? 
    radarthekat