22july2013
About
- Username
- 22july2013
- Joined
- Visits
- 146
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 7,543
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 3,846
Reactions
-
Apple updates Pages, Keynote, and Numbers for the first time in six months
jony0 said:recordable macros too would be nice for the whole suite. -
Apple, Netflix bail out of bidding war for Will Smith biopic amid controversy
Apple TV+ also distributes the movie Hala, which I've uncovered was co-produced by Will Smith's company, Overbook Entertainment. That makes me wonder whether Apple will take action on this movie, too, or let this one slide.
A lot of A-list actors, including Will Smith, start their own production companies to help themselves secure big roles and top billing. Will Smith made Overbook Entertainment which helps him in these regards. In 2019 Will Smith and his wife formed another company, Westbrook Inc, which apparently does much the same thing, but is now a parent company of Overbook. National Geographic has first dibs on Westbrook films, which is odd, and I wonder if NatGeo will cancel their arrangement now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overbrook_Entertainment <--
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westbrook_(company) <--
-
Russia's top tech giant is harvesting data from millions of iOS users
gatorguy said:22july2013 said:mac_dog said:How is this any different than the means google and Facebook or “Meta” (stupid name) collect our data, then sell to the highest bidder?
Google doesn't sell user data, so the question itself is without merit.Even though companies like Facebook and Google aren’t directly selling your data, they are using it for targeted advertising, which creates plenty of opportunities for advertisers to pay and get your personal information in return.
The simplest way is through an ad that links to a website with its own trackers embedded, which can gather information on visitors including their IP address and their device IDs.
Advertising companies are quick to point out that they sell ads, not data, but don’t disclose that clicking on these ads often results in a website collecting personal data. In other words, you can easily give away your information to companies that have paid to get an ad in front of you.
...
“You can say, ‘Hey, Google, I want a list of people ages 18–35 who watched the Super Bowl last year.’ They won’t give you that list, but they will let you serve ads to all those people,” Cyphers said. “Some of those people will click on those ads, and you can pretty easily figure out who those people are. You can buy data, in a sense, that way.” -
Apple TV+ original film 'CODA' wins Best Picture at the 2022 Oscars
-
EU will force Apple & Google to allow third-party app stores, payment services
avon b7 said:davidw said:avon b7 said:foregoneconclusion said:avon b7 said: Not allowing other stores to exist, is.
The market cap is relevant to gatekeeper status.
It could easily be argued that what allowed Apple and others to get this far unchallenged was precisely that, in the beginning, it wasn't such an issue.
As more and more people switch to a more 'digital' lifestyle, the more important these situations have become and solutions for them found.
Legislation is always behind the curve in the technology race. Data protection is a prime example but eventually, things get tackled.
Wouldn't you say that the EU focusing on allowing third party app stores and side loading, without considering security and privacy issues, as being..... behind the curve in the technology race? Don't you think that the "data protection" aspect of allowing third party stores and side loading, should be tackled first, instead of .... will eventually get tackled, after our data have already been stolen or held for ransomware by being scammed into installing a malicious app. Google haven't even completely tackled the problem yet and they been working over 10 years at it. Not everyone that are living a "digital lifestyle", are tech savvy.
Apple developed iOS from the ground up, with security, privacy and data protection in mind. So now Apple should be punished by the EU for being ahead of the tech curve?
This new proposal actually covers a lot of bases and user online security and privacy are major elements.
If there was a poll and if the vast majority of Apple users liked Apple's current set of features, you would still want to force Apple to follow your dictates? User satisfaction means nothing to you?