kitatit

About

Username
kitatit
Joined
Visits
36
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
127
Badges
0
Posts
68
  • ANZ first to offer contactless eftpos payments in Australia thanks to Apple Pay

    laytech said:
    What a brilliant option and all credit to ANZ, that is a feature i would use. Yet, i can't because I am with Westpac or are dragging their sorry arses, refusing to accept ApplePay while the collude with the other 2 big banks to try and protect their profits. ANZ is looking more and more attractive for a switch!
    My thoughts exactly! I'm stuck with Westpac too, due to my home loan with them. Hurry up WestPac! If your home loan rates slip too far, I'm outa here! Give us Apple Pay already, you greedy thugs!
    watto_cobra
  • BNZ second bank to support Apple Pay in New Zealand

    Bank of New Zealand is owned by NAB (National Australian Bank) which is one of Australian's thug cartel banks blocking Apple Pay. Hopefully the feedback from BNZ customers will make NAB give us Apple Pay in Australia. 

    Sorry banks, you don't get to wear the pants this time. We will never choose you before Apple.  

    Have fun NZ,  I'm jealous!
    lostkiwiwatto_cobra
  • AppleInsider readers are split on the iPhone X notch, but most support Apple's decision to...

    I like it! Instantly recognisable as an iPhone X and also difficult and expensive to clone.
    suddenly newtonwatto_cobra
  • Apple's 'iPhone 8' rumored to top out at 7.5W for wireless charging

    jdw said:
     I concur with those here who say Apple is reserving the 15W tech for the iPhone 9 so as to have something compelling for would-be buyers of the iPhone 9. Seriously, those of us who have been Apple enthusiasts since the 1980s know Apple very well. This is nothing new.  Apple has long put "old tech" in their devices so as to make more money and to compel people to upgrade when the next "latest and greatest" Apple device comes out. And that is precisely why Power Computing other Mac clone makers were so successful in taking away business from Apple when Apple decided to license macOS in the 1990s. It was because those clone makers departed from Apple's strategy and instead put modern technology in their devices, along with greater expandability and upgradability, which is what the lured customers away from Apple's comparatively sub par machines.  Even though Apple had a better industrial design than those clone makers, customers flocked to the clone makers because of faster performance, more ports, and better overall hardware functionality. 

    All of this means that if Apple would start giving people more value in Macs, they would have even more success than they have now.  Macs have always been expensive, but in the past at least we Mac lovers could say that we were getting our money's worth. I'm not so sure we can really say that anymore about modern Macs, perhaps with the exception of the iMac alone. 

    This truth will of course piss off all of the "Apple is always right and never wrong, let's worship Apple" people in this forum.  But truth is truth.  If Apple were to license macOS today, a clone maker would probably come out with a 17 inch MacBook Pro that offers not only all of the functionality 15 inch MacBook Pro offers, but also restore everything Apple gutted from the 2015 edition.   And they would probably sell quite well even if some could argue that Apple's manufacturing precision and design aesthetic were comparatively better.  

    Windows lovers would try to argue that we can get all of that now simply by turning the Windows, but that's like a Jedi turning to the Darkside. We who love macOS are sticking with macOS.  We simply long for a greater value in the machines that we buy which run MacOS, which means we want more functionality, not less. And that doesn't mean more functionality from "a universal port that requires numerous dongles that likely will be forgotten at home."  I'm happy to have those new USBC ports so long as we have at least one of the old USBA ports onboard too. And let us not forget the beloved SD card slot either. 
    I absolutely agree jdw. I bought a Power Computing  clone back in the day for those reasons. Apple lost the plot around MacOS 9 and it became a crash monster. I then had a Sharp notebook for 7yrs. I'm still running a 2008 unibody 15" MacBook Pro now. It was good value then. But now I just can't stomach the current prices. Here in Australia I noticed a big surge in people buying MacBooks in 2008-2010 as the value was there.

    I buy Apple products because I see the value in the total cost of ownership and the experience, not because I'm rich. 

    I honestly can't see myself changing from iOS but when my old timer Mac eventually becomes totally unusable, cough, choke, it's not a certainty that I'll buy another Mac.


    jdw
  • Cypress IoT software development kit takes advantage of Apple's new, open HomeKit policy

    I'm excited to hear this.

    At the moment, only the largest companies with the deepest pockets can afford to spend the money on developing HomeKit products. This leads to them concentrating on the large markets like the US or only the safe high volume products.

    Here in Australia, with only 24 million people at present, we don't even have an option to buy a HomeKit power outlet on a standard wall plate. We can only plug in a HomeKit adapter that looks like an AC travel adaptor. 

    I'm all for this. If companies like Cypress  can get this difficult stuff sorted for developers/manufacturers. The HomeKit premium over a non automated products will eventually be 30% instead of 200-2000%

    I think it's smart for Apple to do this to get the momentum going. The cost will come down when your average person knows what HomeKit is, not just people who read Appleinsider.
    iqatedololliverwatto_cobra