rbnetengr

About

Username
rbnetengr
Joined
Visits
34
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
275
Badges
1
Posts
74
  • Apple could be Tesla's biggest threat, analyst says

    My best guess for how Apple is going to blow up the market and offer something that differentiates it from other car companies is to approach it to through services. Apple would supply a car service like no other. And with the integration with iOS, the ease and personalization you would experience upon entering the service would far exceed what any other service could offer. 
    Then you consider some of Apple’s possible costs... the maintenance on electric vehicles versus combustion vehicles, electric wins hands down. For the replacement parts (tires/brakes), these can be easily monitored and replaced on a schedule (something that Apple is exceptionally good at). The avoidance of having to build dealerships (as you are not selling cars). 

    When I ask the question how much mark up can one make on the sale of a car? My guess is on the low side of things. I don’t see how Apple makes its usual percentage on selling vehicles. But if they create fleets of vehicles and slowly dispatch them in major cities they are not competing with vehicle makers directly; rather, they are coming at them from a position that fits Apple’s playbook and next thing you know the game has changed and Apple is in a dominant position in very quick fashion... say 10 years?? 
    There are many cars that have been on the market for years that will turn on a reminder to get a service (Oil, Brakes, etc).  But many of these have no basis in reality. After all, why would anyone who cares about maintaining his/her $70k (or much more) BMW, Mercedes Benz, etc. have the oil changed once per year because “the car told me”?  Manufacturers who provide ‘free’ maintenance under warranty, like BMW, are clearly wanting to do the minimum amount of maintenance under warranty. That’s why so many BMWs on the used market have engine issues, because they had three oil changes in 50k miles, rather than ten!  And there’s no way that anyone, even Apple, could determine that the tires, brakes, wheel bearings, etc are worn and need service.  They are all just time/ usage estimations, and why would Apple be any better at doing that than manufacturers who have built cars for decades?

    Also, who is going to service these Apple vehicles if Apple doesn’t have a dealer network? Pep Boys? Firestone? Midas? Eddie’s Auto Shop? 

    Regarding your statement about fleets of vehicles...that’s exactly the opposite of Apple, who builds products that cater to individuals. The last thing that Apple would want with an Apple Car would be a plain autonomous drone that blends into the automotive background. 

    It makes no sense (to me) for Apple to venture so far outside their market space, and produce vehicles. I’m a huge Apple fanboy (currently have two MacBook Pros, two iPhones, two AppleTVs, an iPad, an Apple Watch, and an old iMac that needs to go away), but I do not see any motivation for me to own an Apple Car. I don’t want an autonomous pod to chauffeur me around as I snap selfies and update my social media. I am a driver, and enjoy the experience of driving. 
    JWSC
  • Logitech debuts lower-cost Ergo M575 trackball for $49.99

    I am also a fan of trackballs. I have been using a Kensington Orbit trackball for over ten years now, with both Windows and MacOS computers, and have been very happy with it. 


    It is a wired trackball, but they also make a wireless version now. But for $40, and the fact that is still working after more than ten years in a daily work environment, I have been completely satisfied with it. 
    jeffharris
  • State report says Foxconn's Wisconsin plant 'more of a showcase' than a factory

    Bringing manufacturing jobs back to America is how we are Making America Great Again.  
    watto_cobra
  • Foxconn's bid for tax subsidies rejected by Wisconsin officials

    Is this how we Make America Great Again?

    -__- 
    fred1AlgerDAalsethricmacronn
  • 5G iPhone launch unlikely to be 'massive event,' AT&T executive says

    I think that it doesn’t make sense to offer mm wave  5G in an iPhone. Mm waves require line of sight for communication, so you need to not only have your device out in the open, but also a clear shot to a mm wave antenna. At mm wavelengths, the radio waves act light light waves. So, if your device is in a ‘shadow’ caused by something blocking your device’s line of sight, it will either not work at all, or work poorly.  Verizon is apparently banking on it to claim the highest 5G speeds, but what good is it if it’s only available in 2% of their coverage footprint?  

    They also chose to deploy it in stadiums, where high density population gathers for events. So, what good is it to have 5G serving the football stadium that you visit...never?

    I thought that the purpose for mm wave 5G was to replace wired internet (DSL/Cable) with a fixed, line of sight system. Thus, gigabit Ethernet speeds without needing to wait for AT&T, Google, etc to rip up the neighborhood and streets to trench fiber. 
    razorpitwatto_cobra