cropr
About
- Username
- cropr
- Joined
- Visits
- 160
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 3,373
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 1,149
Reactions
-
iPhone owners will be able to disable CPU throttling in future iOS version, Cook says
chasm said:“I demand the right to choose to have my iPhone just spontaneously crash or die on me rather than be FORCED to accept Apple’s alternative of SLIGHTLY slowing it down a bit when it’s under load and the battery is chemically depleted!” This is a perfect example of the kind of gross stupidity produced when gross tech ignorance is combined with bad reporting (in other outlets, AI has done a good job with his IMO), creating mass hysteria.
The difference between my quote and your quote, is that my quote is a real story coming from a loyal Apple customer (my daughter). Buying a new iPhone has a serious impact on her budget. So she feels Apple has misled her. I am sure you have much better technical skills than my daughter but with your cynical quote you just demonstrated you are unable to have some understanding for the real customer issues.
The question is: who is full of gross stupidity?
-
Apple's first million HomePods now shipping from Inventec - report
foggyhill said:lorin schultz said:foggyhill said:
[...] Apple is all about INTEGRATION. That's were they shine and provide added value.
None of that is a direct reflection on the as-yet untested HomePod per se, and obviously Apple probably does a better job of integration than other manufacturers. Still, it's not fair to say that buying a product made by Apple rather than someone else necessarily means it will either work well or play nicely with other Apple products. The holes in the ecosystem and occasional steps backwards (iLife, Final Cut, Apple TV are examples) indicate that it's not safe to assume every new product will mark progress on that front.
Setting an ecosystem is one thing, keeping it all part alive and active, is a hell of a lot harder.
That's why there are not many outside Apple that have done it, though a lot of the other players are following in its footstep including Amazon and Google.
Bizarrely, Samsung is not being very successful at this despite having a huge range of hardware.
Microsoft is also struggling here.
Especially if coding / hardware & R&D resources internally are not unlimited.
Many people seem to think you can just hire STEM people left and right like they grow on trees and throw them at any problem and you'll get a sellable product... If Only it was that easy.
In fact, sometimes they have to backoff because they adapted to the wrong thing, the wrong local user need that hinders adaptation to the overall ecosystem.
So,overall ecosystem pressure leads to cull of products perfectly adapted to their niche leaving those that depended on these adaptation without a home.
Only my daughter and I have iPhones, the rest of the family prefers Android. A speaker of 350$ that can only be used by 2 of 5 people in the family is not an option.
And the Dutch version of Siri has to improve a lot before such a device can be used at all.
-
Google unites its Apple Pay alternatives under Google Pay banner
GeorgeBMac said:There are two reasons for using Apple Pay:
1) Convenience
2) Security -- since your card number and personal information are not provided to the seller and it actually provides a higher level of security than a chip card.
As I understand it, Google Pay does not provide that same level of security and, in fact, does provide the seller with your personal information. Perhaps that has changed and Google is now providing a secure payment method that protects your personal information? Oh Wait! Google is the company that profits from selling your personal information! So: Probably not... (sigh...)
And by the way Google does not sell personal information. Google sells advertisements. A company who buys an Adwords campaign at Google, never gets the personal details of the people who received the ads. The company can define filters (females, 30 - 40 years old, like sports, income above 100K$, ...) but Google does not disclose who actually gets the ad. I have used Google Adwords service several times myself, so I am pretty sure about this.
-
Why Apple's Siri needs to become an 'ambient' ecosystem to compete against Amazon & Google...
macplusplus said:cropr said:genovelle said:kkqd1337 said:Apple should have been in this market first. Siri is consistently terrible and it’s embarrasing for them that Amazon have come from no where to create this whole Echo/AI market. I just can’t understand what Apple and Google are doing with all their money and knowledge. They are both now playing catch up to Amazon? A shopping store.
I hope Apple intend to do something more than just look out the windows in their new campus.
But as a Dutch speaking Belgian, I can say that Srii in Dutch is useless, because it is does not understand 80% of what I am saying. Using Siri in English is much better in recognizing what I am saying, but Siri in English does not understand any Dutch or French names, which is quite painful for navigation and contact related apps. Asking Siri in English to play a song with a English title works fine, but that's about it. Very poor of Apple.
And by the way, Google Now on an iPhone does a much better job in understanding my Dutch, so it can't be that difficult.
Siri will recognize French and English names in a Dutch sentence. But an English Siri cannot cope with Dutch place names and directions, this is a known fact with other languages and geographies as well. If you want to use Siri in local navigation you must set it to local language.
Some months ago I asked the Dutch version of Siri the route to 5 main streets of Antwerp, the biggest Dutch speaking city in Belgium: Of "Noorderlaan", "Amerkalei", "Desguinlei", "Meir", "Grote Steenweg", Siri only gave me a correct route for "Noorderlaan": that is an 80% miss. My intent was very clear and Siri did understand my intent, but not the names of the streets, making it completely useless for navigation purposes. One could wonder how the quality assurance happened, if it does not understand the main streets of Antwerp.
Google Now did 4 out of 5, only missing "Desguilei", which is the toughest one as is it the combination of a French part "Desguin" and a Dutch part "lei". And I could force Google Now to understand it if I pronounced "Deguinlei" as a full Dutch word. This trick did not help with Siri.
-
Why Apple's Siri needs to become an 'ambient' ecosystem to compete against Amazon & Google...
genovelle said:kkqd1337 said:Apple should have been in this market first. Siri is consistently terrible and it’s embarrasing for them that Amazon have come from no where to create this whole Echo/AI market. I just can’t understand what Apple and Google are doing with all their money and knowledge. They are both now playing catch up to Amazon? A shopping store.
I hope Apple intend to do something more than just look out the windows in their new campus.
But as a Dutch speaking Belgian, I can say that Srii in Dutch is useless, because it is does not understand 80% of what I am saying. Using Siri in English is much better in recognizing what I am saying, but Siri in English does not understand any Dutch or French names, which is quite painful for navigation and contact related apps. Asking Siri in English to play a song with a English title works fine, but that's about it. Very poor of Apple.
And by the way, Google Now on an iPhone does a much better job in understanding my Dutch, so it can't be that difficult.