bobschlob

More pissed about no 3-d touch on the "NEW" iPhone.
Guess Apple will have to make a brand new 3-d touch commercial with Aubrey: "I'm peeking my flight. I'm not peeking my flight. I'm peeking my... wait, my brand new iPhone doesn't do that..."

saarek said:

Unless you use very few apps and rarely take photos it {16 GB} is not enough.

You would be shocked how many people that describes.

apple ][ said:

6Sgoldfish said:

I'm going to play contrarian overkill: I would prefer a phone just thick enough to house that kick-ass camera in a flush shell with awesome battery and a headphone jack.
*ba dum tss*

There's reality and then there's fantasy.

What you wish for clearly belongs in the fantasy realm, as anybody who knows Apple, knows that they aren't going to drastically thicken the iPhone all of a sudden.

Uh... well, unless you consider the phone that comes out next week.

This would be the first iPhone that I would buy a case for, 'specifically" to cover it's ugliness. (if it were real {which it is not})

wizard69 said:

levi said:

I've wondered what an attractive implementation of a dual lense iPhone might look like. Not sure this is it. 

I wonder when people will stop stressing about something that means nothing?

Yes. Aesthetics means nothing to Apple. (rolls eyes so hard they fall out of sockets)