gilly33

About

Username
gilly33
Joined
Visits
110
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
1,643
Badges
2
Posts
444
  • How to use Sign In With Apple and manage your log in information

    And so why exactly should we believe that Apple is any more ethical here than others like Google +, Facebook and the rest? Just because Apple says so? Please .... All are American, money-fascinated & tarred with exactly the same shareholder priorities; these days, user data is the most valuable commodity on earth. BTW, also check out the awful roll out of Apple TV+ (user login errors, error 404, wants credit card, not debit card, buggy and I very much doubt the security here as well.
    And while your at it. Why don’t you mention that the stupid Apple Park is one big circular monstrosity and why is Tim Cook the CEO he’s a douche and why didn’t Apple make another phone besides iPhone like Samsung and sell them really cheap? Why stop there with your crazy rant? Huh huh? Come on! Hmm what’s for lunch? Oh an apple. Yum. 
    watto_cobra
  • Apple TV+ versus Disney+ compared -- the streaming wars escalate

    Now that I’ve read this article not sure I’m interested as much to jump in at launch anymore. The appeal for me is the backlog of movies from Fox and Disney. But for an ‘extra couple of dollars’ more? Hmmm. Apple hit the sweet spot with 1 year free with the purchase of a new device and I like $4.99 so unless the content absolutely sucks I’m in. Just not feeling the pull on this one.
    AppleExposedwatto_cobra
  • Apple's brawny 5G iPhone family will require larger, pricey motherboards

    One thing’s for sure: Apple won’t be adding $400 for 5G. We’re not going to see a $1,099 iPhone 11S, a $1,399 11S Pro or a $1,499 11S Pro Max. 
    Hah! I forgot next year should be an S cycle year. Be interesting to see what they do. 
    watto_cobra
  • Apple's brawny 5G iPhone family will require larger, pricey motherboards

    DAalseth said:
    ITGUYINSD said:
    I've yet to be convinced that this whole "5G thing" isn't really a fleecing of consumers because carriers (and phone manufacturers) have run out of ways to innovate and need a revenue stream in the coming years.

    It's going to be spotty coverage.  It doesn't penetrate buildings well.  Short distance.  And, most of all, who needs that sort of speed on a phone?  You're not going to watch a 2 hour movie any faster!  Not to say some people won't have some reason to validate ridiculously fast speeds on a phone, but for 99% of us, isn't the existing 4GLTE system plenty fast?   If the carriers just worked on filling in the dead spots for that, who needs 5G?  The other day, on AT&T, I was getting 100 down/50 up.  Why would I need anything faster on my iPhone?

    And now, 5G devices will be more expensive, bigger, hotter, etc.  Not convinced.

    Exactly right. And that’s why I’m getting an 11. Here in the land of heavy rain, thick forests, and long distances, it will be a looooong time before we get 5G, and even then I don’t expect much if any benefit. (Heck, i still run into spots of 3G around here.) I’ll use my 11 for 3-5 years and then see what things look like. If I need a big or fast download, nearly every office, coffee shop, or house around here has Shaw Open wifi. I’m very much not waiting for, or even that excited about 5G. I see through the hype.
    Agreed. It’s funny how all the self perceived tech gurus spew this stuff on YouTube and tech sites like if Apple is a being left behind the likes of Samsung et al in not being early adopters of this technology. When in reality 5G is not the ‘promised land’ they make it out to be. Hell they can’t even eliminate dead zones which I understand logistically but how about work on that problem first uh?
    watto_cobralkruppAppleExposed
  • Apple's brawny 5G iPhone family will require larger, pricey motherboards

    ITGUYINSD said:
    I've yet to be convinced that this whole "5G thing" isn't really a fleecing of consumers because carriers (and phone manufacturers) have run out of ways to innovate and need a revenue stream in the coming years.

    It's going to be spotty coverage.  It doesn't penetrate buildings well.  Short distance.  And, most of all, who needs that sort of speed on a phone?  You're not going to watch a 2 hour movie any faster!  Not to say some people won't have some reason to validate ridiculously fast speeds on a phone, but for 99% of us, isn't the existing 4GLTE system plenty fast?   If the carriers just worked on filling in the dead spots for that, who needs 5G?  The other day, on AT&T, I was getting 100 down/50 up.  Why would I need anything faster on my iPhone?

    And now, 5G devices will be more expensive, bigger, hotter, etc.  Not convinced.

    I’m inclined to go along with you. Still get call failures in areas that it shouldn’t with AT&T. And they are pushing 5G for what? No thank you. If next year’s iPhone gets a bump in price because of some motherboard to accommodate 5G then I’ll upgrade to the 11 pro. Just saying. Ain’t spending anymore money on something that is a marketing plan where I have to be in an urban location to enjoy. No thanks. 
    watto_cobra