macplusplus
About
- Username
- macplusplus
- Joined
- Visits
- 296
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 3,141
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 2,119
Reactions
-
Intel chip kernel flaw requires OS-level fix that could impact macOS performance, report s...
larryjw said:I’m not likely understanding some of this story. One key statement is there is no firmware fix. Looking on Intels site, they have a table listing each cpu, and the minimum ME firmware version that resolves the issue, or at least one of the issues.
Like one of the other commenters, I too, in December, purchased a new mbp but also an new iMac. The About My MAC doesn’t describe the cpu level of detail about its firmware versions to know whether my chips have the latest firmware versions. It’s goimg to be Apple’s resonsibilty to push out the firmware updates.
A second thing to note. Intel has downloadable software to analyze your system for these flaws, but the software only runs under windows or Linux. Intel needs to push out a version for macOS.
Name: <your computer's name>Manufacturer: Apple Inc.Model: MacBookPro11,5Processor Name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4870HQ CPU @ 2.50GHzOS Version: Microsoft Windows 8.1 ProEngine: Intel(R) Management EngineVersion: 9.1.20.1035SVN: 1Status: This system is not vulnerable.
Other Macs may be vulnerable or not. If any Mac is vulnerable of course Apple will issue a system update.For the curious, here is Intel's official response. Tired of playing the voluntary reporter. Why don't you update your article AI?
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000025619/software.html -
Intel chip kernel flaw requires OS-level fix that could impact macOS performance, report s...
According to early reports, the flaw allows to make some kernel-specific VM pages accessible from the user space, using some techniques not disclosed yet. Not writing critical information to VM pages is the ABC of kernel programming in Apple development culture, critical information must be held in wired memory that cannot be paged. That flaw and the potential exploits are probably already known by operating system developers so that saga may end up with nothing. Forget class actions and alike... -
First look: Benchmarks put Apple's entry-level $4999 iMac Pro to the test
VRing said:macplusplus said:
No one would notice that minus 0.3 GHz in real life usage. The stock throttles more than that 0.3 GHz by the way...
“the clock speed to drop from 3.9GHz to about 3.6GHz for a second or two. This allowed the CPU to drop below 92 degrees, and the clock speed to rise back to the maximum 3.9GHz”
Apple's solution is downclocked and still throttles.
So your (mis)understanding "how may it throttle at 3.9 while it can Turbo at 4.5" doesn't make sense, you compare apples to oranges. -
First look: Benchmarks put Apple's entry-level $4999 iMac Pro to the test
wizard69 said:The thermal throttling is a huge problem in a professional machine. Sadly AI is seeing throttling in extremely light usage imagine how much you would loose over 8 hours.
Frankly this is not unexpected! Apples history with the word "pro" and cramming hot parts into a tight enclosure isnt good. Every day im becoming more and more convinced that Apple just doesnt understand the "PRO" market. -
iOS apps on macOS would bring hope for Apple Watch, Apple Health support on Mac
ihatescreennames said:I would be quite happy if my Health and HomeKit data could be synced and backed up locally. I prefer to set up my iPhones as new but doing so currently means I would lose all that Health data history.