fishwhisperer

This feels the same way as when the iPhone was launched: all the other state of the art devices at the time felt instantly obsolete and clumsy. I have used the Quest a couple of times and was not impressed. I haven't used the Vision Pro of course, but just from the keynote and the reviews, it feels like you don't want to be one of the other guys. I can only imagine how they are rushing to catch up.

I think the Mac Studio is enough for a lot of previous Mac Pro buyers who needed the power but not the extendibility of the past Mac Pro, reducing the need for an extensible Mac Pro. In addition, the new SoC approach of Apple Silicon does not allow it to extend memory, which is probably a must have for buyers of this kind of machines. Because of this, I am a bit surprised Apple came with a new Mac Pro. This is not a Mac Pro in the same sense the previous one was.

Will this be another Nokia moment for Microsoft, in which they bet on the wrong horse?

If being available in Myanmar was so critical to Proton, why would they push an update at that time? Also, if the update was critical, then why not explain it? This looks like a cheap way to gain attention at the expense of Apple. Not that Apple behaves perfectly all the time with everybody, but in this instance it just looks like Proton created a storm out of a glass of water to get competitive attention.

Why every article of VR/AR headsets have to show the horrible Magic Leap device that makes the user look like a gigantic insect? There are better looking ones, or even design concepts that would better fit these articles. Moreover, Magic Leap is death or in its last heart beats...