anton zuykov

About

Username
anton zuykov
Joined
Visits
82
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
1,612
Badges
1
Posts
1,056
  • Apple provides Japanese customers with free repairs following floods and landslides

    Next article from "experts" or "journalists" somewhere:
    "Apple shameless use of poor victims of mudslides in Japan in an attempt obtain a more positive image has to stop".
    or
    "Apple is not doing nearly enough to help Japanese people, victimized by nature and mudslides. Corporatism gone too far".
    watto_cobraairnerd
  • New patent lawsuit targets Apple over voice control tech in Siri- & HomeKit-enabled device...

    Typically, if your patent is cited as prior art in 46 of someone else’s patents, it’d be a fair bet they looked hard at your patent and either decided they aren’t infringing or they picked apart your claims and engineered their solutions to ensure they don’t infringe.  It’s difficult to write a patent that prevents someone working around it by adding, deleting or modifying some part of the claimed invention, just enough to escape infringement.

    Patents aren’t always about protecting inventions from infringement; they’re often about staking a claim in a space so that you don’t get sued for infringing someone else's patent.  And I think that’s a fair use.  It’s not such a noble pursuit when a non-practicing entity scopes out a piece of real estate in some new/emerging space for the express purpose of building a toll road there, charging any entity that intends to actually invent in that space something that would serve a market or society at large.  
    Unless you make your patent sound as permissibly vague as possible.
    Like, controlling a device with a voice, by utilizing computing systems for processing.

    I am surprised we can't patent "do stuff with stuff". What a wonderful patent that would be... until someone destroys it with prior art claim.
    muthuk_vanalingamAlex1N
  • Samsung continues anti-iPhone X crusade with three new videos

    tmay said:
    gatorguy said:
    tmay said:
    Soli said:
    Aloysius said:
    Soli said:
    These are solid ads.
    Eh, I don't think so really. At least not on attracting new customers.

    I think this whole ad campaign is great at making Samsung's customers feel better that they made the superior choice. It's preaching to the choir, so to speak.

    I have trouble thinking the average person is concerned about the notch (considering just about every phone has one now), sd card slots (it may be expandable, but a pain when you need to transfer data if you outgrow one and don't have a pc), or split screen. At least not as buzz words. 

    If these things are truly important, than show it in action and sell the benefits, not just listen a few random things the iPhone doesn't have.
    1) I"m not sure what you mean by "new customers."

    2) I think these videos are good because they're targeting their base well. These are not for iPhone users (although they'd love to get some switchers from Android). On a minor level I think these are people that have never used a smartphone but have heard various chatter from the Android-using masses about how Apple doesn't do this or that and how Apple just charges you for for their brand name. Mostly, I think these ads are targeted towards Android users. People that already make those dumb comments about Apple sucks to justify their current crap device. These ads target those people.
    This is just Samsung positioning itself as "Android's iPhone", and I agree that it is targeted at existing Samsung customers especially those that might me be lured to some to the other Premium Android OS devices.

    Still, Apple's ecosystem remains unparalleled, so I don't see many current iPhone users leaving, and certainly the data shows more entering.

    Increasingly that's the same with Android users. Both camps are pretty well ensconced. Apple users will remain Apple users and Android owners are even more likely to remain with Android according to the report from last month. 
    You might be referring to this report;

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2018/03/10/apples-ios-loyalty-rate-is-lower-than-googles-android-but-apple-may-steal-more-users-each-year/#258d10f268a8

    Indicates a likely net gain of users to iOS, but loyalty rate favors Android OS

    iOS switchers

    • 86% loyalty during 2017 (therefore 14% switch)
    • 215.8 million iPhones sold
    • “Lost” about 30 million to Android

    Android switchers

    • 91% loyalty rate during 2017 (therefore 9% switch)
    • 1.244 billion Android smartphones sold
    • “Lost” about 112 million to iOS
    No mention of what is happening to remaining Windows phone users...
    .
    It doesn't matter how many devices you sell. It matters, what net profit you get from that. 
    1.2 BILLION devices is a meaningless number, unless you are Google with 1.2 Billion users who Google sells as their product to advertisers as clicks.
    Also, 112 million to iOS is a larger number than 30 million lost to Android. Like, 3.7 times more! 
    watto_cobra
  • Apple forecast to hit 41.6M iPhones as product becomes 'stable business'

    The iPhone is "becoming a stable business, performing more like software than hardware," 
    So it is only now is becoming a stable business? Okay.... So, it was unstable before with all those huge and stable profits? I see...
    Rayz2016cornchip
  • Apple forecast to hit 41.6M iPhones as product becomes 'stable business'

    larryjw said:
    Trump's trade war with the world means nobody's financial forecasts can be taken seriously, including Apple's. 
    How was it any different comparing to "before the war" time? 
    Rayz2016