larryjw
About
- Username
- larryjw
- Joined
- Visits
- 191
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 3,299
- Badges
- 2
- Posts
- 1,031
Reactions
-
Apple Vision Pro is already a win for Apple & consumers
-
Apple Car is delayed -- again
-
YouTube and Spotify also won't offer any apps on Apple Vision Pro
-
Apple Watch import ban stay opposed by ITC
-
Apple Watch import ban saga kicked off a decade ago by an early-morning email to Tim Cook
Regardless, the issue is whether there was a patent violation. How it came about is not relevant.
A patent violation is a patent violation, accidental or purposeful. Defenses can be brought, such as "there is only one way to do this" or "it's obvious from prior art", or ...
I haven't read any analysis of why there was not a licensing agreement in the first place, once litigation was a possibility.