larryjw

About

Username
larryjw
Joined
Visits
199
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
3,338
Badges
2
Posts
1,040
  • Microsoft says Windows on ARM will not support Apple M1 Macs

    rcfa said:
    Let’s be realistic: Microsoft CANNOT support Windows on M-series CPU Macs, at least not until Apple wants is and actively supports it (maybe even pays it) and Apple doesn’t seem to have any intentions to do so.

    Why? Because the M1 chip, while having ARM standard cores, also has proprietary GPU cores and proprietary neutral cores. In short, M$ could only support a fraction of what the CPU has to offer, and would need to rely on costly reverse engineering for the rest, something they’d have to repeat with each iteration of Apple Silicon.

    At this point, it’s not even clear if Apple isn’t forking the entire ARM architecture: Apple has introduced proprietary extensions that stand at odds with ARM’s recent extensions to the instruction set.

    ARM pushes Ethos (NPU) and Mail (GPU), and as far as I understand Apple’s NPU and GPU cores aren’t superior implementations of the same architecture (as is the case for the CPU part of the M-series chips). So in essence, let’s be clear: Apple’s M-series is only ARM architecture in regards to the ever less relevant CPU part of the SoC, NPU and GPU cores are utterly proprietary, closed, undocumented in need of reverse engineering, designed to be accessed through Apple’s APIs and libraries.

    Now tell me again how Microsoft could possibly support Windows on M-series hardware, except through an inferior emulation that’s performance limited because it can’t use the hardware to the fullest. There will of course be VMs that will run it, as whatever standard hardware M$ will support, can be emulated; but it will be “unsupported, use at your own peril”.

    It’s also not clear if and when Apple will implement the new developments in the ARM architecture, or just roll their own extensions:

    https://www.arm.com/why-arm/architecture/cpu


    I generally agree. 

    However, I've noticed Apple doesn't document much early on. The M1 SoC is in it's initial development phase, with more to come. My guess is Apple doesn't know where it's going with Apple Silicon, so don't want to be bound to support what would be prematurely documented. 

    Of course, it could be laziness! 

    The last thing us programmer types like to do is document our code. We're just happy to get the stuff working, then we're off to the next deployment. 
    muthuk_vanalingamshamino
  • Fired Apple employee who aired workplace concerns gets approval to sue company

    genovelle said:
    ... drilling down on some of the article links may better help understand her concerns and zeitgeist ...
    https://www.theverge.com/22648265/apple-employee-privacy-icloud-id
    https://sfbayview.com/2021/03/i-thought-i-was-dying-my-apartment-was-built-on-toxic-waste/
    As a very long time Apple customer I have had increasing questions about Apple's direction since 2011.
    I am reminded of the 'Think Different' campaign that featured images of individuals such as the civil rights lawyer Gandhi...
    I read both of these and find them lacking. In regards to privacy. She is working for the most secretive companies on the planet. They gave them the option of having a separate work phone and to pay for her own personal devices, but she chose not to. It was too inconvenient for her. Her terms of employment clearly state to expect no privacy on devices used for company business. They have a right to monitor these activities and search offices when needed. Just like drug screening can be randomly required when it is company policy. On the environmental thing, she is creating issues by making subjective judgments about reports and their findings being suspicious. California is crazy aggressive on environmental issues and what she is describing would not have been tested to the degree it was in most states. She lost all credibility when she paid almost $1200 for testing that came back negative (inconclusive) which is what every report she questioned provided. Then she wanted to claim it needed to be test that collected data for 6 months. I can promise you, on any given Thursday you can walk outside of a number of cities here in Louisiana within 50 miles of a chemical plant and collect enough toxins from the air in 20 minutes to fill a report and it’s legal. Did she consider the toxins in her tattoos? According to the CDC, You also might become allergic to other products, such as hair dyes, if your tattoo contains p-phenylenediamene (PPD). She may be having a reaction to certain building materials or even types of paint in her apartment that effects no one else because of changes in her body chemistry based on her own choices. 

    This response seems quite reasonable. However, I do have an important bone to pick with it.

    "The Right" to do something is not a license to do such a thing. Too many today think their "rights" have no limits, or that their "rights" must be exercised. This applies to both the employee in this case, and Apple, too. The "right" of Apple to monitor an employee's activities and to search offices can only be supported if executed with significant discretion. And, an employee certainly has a right and obligation to ensure a safe and reasonable work environment, but must also be exercised in proportion to the harm, if any. 

    Rights if abused will be lost -- and probably should be lost. 

    I remember from my lawyering days, a divorced couple constantly pushing their "rights" and frequently going to court to get fairly trivial matters resolved by the court (custody time, vacation, etc). By constantly arguing for "their rights" they failed to recognize they had ceded "their rights" to the judge and their respective attorneys. 
    applguy
  • Apple now looking to tackle car manufacture by itself

    scott6666 said:
    If these people can’t make a TV how on earth are they gonna make a car?
    Of course, Apple can make a TV. So can thousands of others. 

    "Can" is never the issue; it's does it make sense, can a company bring something to the market that others have not been able to?

    Tesla has mind-share. I'm not so sure Tesla is here for the long term; they don't have much of a track record. They exist by virtue of some unexplainable deification of Elon Musk -- the cult of personality.

    What nobody outside of Apple has is any idea about Apple's plans, if any. 
    StrangeDayswatto_cobra
  • Long-time Apple foe trying to stop iPhone 13 production

    Patent law turns on the specifics of patents. No link was supplied to the patent in question, so I cannot review what they patented. It can't be just voice recognition -- I doubt whether "voice recognition" per se is even patentable. 

    Attempts at voice recognition have been in the works for 50 years and add in language parsing and multi-language recognition even to that. 

    I was programming devices for automatic answering machines back in the 1980's like "Press or say one for ...."

    And the technology behind voice recognition has changed drastically since then. I'm not even clear what can be patentable today that will be relevant 5 years from now. The science and engineering is expanding rapidly. The last thing we need is to have IP stifle needed improvements. 
    Scot1Oferwatto_cobra
  • Crowds flock to opening of Changsha Apple Store

    without dependence on China. 

    Thanks though. 
    What's the problem with dependence on China? No one is able to build Apple devices better?

    You think this anti-China stuff is just another example of White Supremacy? 

    Lazy Americans who don't or can't do the job, and CEOs and investors who'd prefer big paychecks rather than investment in capacity (education, etc). 

    Sure we need more programmers doing video games, and people playing them. 
    lorca2770GeorgeBMac