- Last Active
canukstorm said:williamh said:While these glimpses into Apple are interesting, the whole line of questioning in the trial about what Apple could have done is highly annoying. Could Apple have allowed side loading, etc.Let’s dig into what “epic” might have done. “Epic”could have followed the terms of it’s agreement with Apple. That was a choice. “Epic” could have developed a phone, it’s own commission free and open App Store, why not? Amazon made a phone and makes tablets. Facebook made a phone. Why not epic?
Based on what’s stated on this article, it does sound like the developer has a case on two points. The only thing I don’t think they have a case on is the App Store issue. So after the NYT article his rating jumped from 143 to 13? Could it not be that the article itself caused a spike in interest, which caused an increase of downloads, which made it jump from 143 to 13? Isn’t that more likely than Apple adjusting the algorithm so they’ll move up in the results?