slow n easy
About
- Username
- slow n easy
- Joined
- Visits
- 75
- Last Active
- Roles
- member
- Points
- 1,263
- Badges
- 1
- Posts
- 404
Reactions
-
Tesla reaches settlement in autopilot death case of Apple engineer
foregoneconclusion said:tmay said:SAE Level 5Full Self-Driving (FSD) is Tesla's branding for its beta testing program to achieve fully autonomous driving (SAE Level 5). The naming is controversial, because vehicles operating under FSD remain at Level 2 automation and are therefore not "fully self-driving" and require active driver supervision.
"In its user manual, Tesla says that Autosteer, one of the main functions of Autopilot, is “intended for use on controlled-access highways with a fully attentive driver.” That usually means highways with on- and off-ramps and a center median to separate opposing lanes."
Autopilot is for controlled-access highways and is similar to other car manufacturer’s auto-driving systems.
Full Self Driving is for all road types including both expressways and city driving. The car handles stop signs, traffic lights, unprotected left turns, pedestrians, etc.
Tesla labels both systems as SAE Level 2 which means that the driver is required to pay attention to the road and surroundings at all times.
Even though Tesla labels both systems as Level 2, Full Self Driving is vastly more capable than Autopilot. -
Tesla reaches settlement in autopilot death case of Apple engineer
-
Tesla reaches settlement in autopilot death case of Apple engineer
There is a massive night and day difference between FSD from 2018 and now. He is proving everyone wrong. All the experts and every major company said that it was impossible for his approach to work, and yet the cars drive by themselves with only minor mistakes here and there. The car still doesn’t understand hand signals yet. I just got back from a 3 ½ hour trip to Indianapolis today and there was a traffic cop waving cars through a red light. That is still one of the situations that the car can’t handle yet. But for the vast majority of situations, the car does fine. I still feel that this will be a finished product by the end of 2026 and most car manufacturers will get Tesla licenses for Honda to use FSD for example and Ford to license FSD, and so on. Tesla is just too far ahead for others to catch up. -
Abandoned $10 billion Apple Car project referred to as 'Titanic disaster' by employees
Draco said:I've been calling BS on self-driving cars since I first heard about it. Yes, driving can be easy 99.5% of the time; it's the other 0.5% that cameras and computers will never solve on existing roads with human drivers and pedestrians.
And "AI" is the next bubble waiting to burst. For important issues involving politics or public policy, we can't even agree on the same set of facts. Google's "artificial intelligence" couldn't even produce a picture of the Founding Fathers without introducing woke BS into the results. -
Abandoned $10 billion Apple Car project referred to as 'Titanic disaster' by employees
Macocalypse said:slow n easy said:There is absolutely nothing wrong with what Tesla is doing,…If you ever want to know if a Muskovite is in the room just say something negative about Tesla.
Edit: Well, I guess I wasn’t super explicit with the previous post. Referring to the Apple Car I said that I would never consider a car that I couldn’t drive myself, which means that I don’t want a self-driving car. Then further down in the post, I said that I ruled out buying a Tesla because I don’t like the iPad-like screen, plus the fact that there is no screen directly in front of me, and the fact that turning off adaptable cruise control is not possible. So you calling me a Muskovite is pretty ridiculous. You seem very closed-minded vs I can see both sides.