rkla

couldn't disagree more, enjoyed it considering the dry material. Conveyed in a fun way. 

nothing "illegal" about non union work, period.  if they wrote it before the strike then they don't break union rules, if they use a writer who doesn't belong to union, they don't break the rules, if a union writer decided to do it non union and not support his union then he/she broke the rules not apple. either way, these are union rules and having nothing to do with legality or US law. 

as for your supporters, "virtue signaling" hahahahaha, ahhhhhh amazing how even educated people can be brainwashed. you don't have to care about the planet but ask yourself why are you triggered when others do???

mjtomlin said:

wood1208 said:

Does anyone know why Apple choose 2 wide angle back camera instead one extra wide and one tele photo ?

Although he was referring to the dual camera system on the iPhone 11, John Gruber from Darirng Fireball mentions...

Fundamentally it’s a bet on the power of computational photography — it’s easier to zoom in digitally than it is to compute a wider field of view.

But as was also mentioned on stage... that extra wide lens can be used in really tight shots, “When there’s no room to back up.”

It’s not harder to compute a wider field of view, its impossible. If the lens can’t see grandma outside the frame, it can’t compute her. Yes you can take a panorama but that’s a different action than pressing the shutter button. It is most likely for 3 reasons 1) people take group shots and can’t back up enough, so you can get shots you wouldn’t otherwise get. 2) more useful for AR applications 3) the ultra wide doesn’t use OIS so prob a cheaper than adding telephoto camera package which does