hucom2000

marcia funebre said:

Right. This would do if you are designer of postal stamps.
I won't even think about a monitor smaller than 43" anymore...

How's you neck feeling these days? LOL

ArcaSwiss said:

I just bought an HP Z27 4K 27" monitor for my 2013 Mac Pro for $479. It's fabulous.  The new Apple display is not worth the difference

Two possibilities only for such a silly statement:

1. you can't afford an XDR display and are envious
2. you are not a professional that needs the color accuracy, size, or any of the other features (in other words: you are not the target group and therefore you don't "get it")

I‘m a bit disappointed that Apple isn‘t clearly winning all of these shoot-outs.

They are making such a fuss about their camera systems, the custom silicone without which this image quality wouldn‘t be possible...

Turns out the competition can achieve (more or less) the same without access to such chips.

I agree with the comments about (lack of) quality control. It’s one thing to have but gs after an update. It’s another to have bricked devices. Or deleting emails.

For years now, Apple has delivered „evolutionary“ updates. Not complete redesigns. And it has unrestricted access to its own hardware for testing. I would therefore expect them to do better.

Hardware quality is stellar. Why they can’t get it right with software is beyond me.

This is BAD. Why would Apple use this to promote? Don't understand.