klink172

About

Username
klink172
Joined
Visits
9
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
36
Badges
0
Posts
16

Reactions

16Like0Dislike4Informative

  • iOS 18 Mail app will get huge AI enhancements & summarizations with 'Project Blackpearl'

    klink172klink172
    What about spam?!?
    9secondkox2watto_cobra

  • Woman claims Apple Store lost her MacBook, later found

    klink172klink172
    Why is this even a story?
    mike1Dogpersonmacpluspluswatto_cobra

  • Lawsuit claims iPhone and other Apple devices infringe on wireless patents

    klink172klink172
    These entities file in districts that are friendly to their type of lawsuits. They’re stacking the deck in their favor by filing where they file. This court is, obviously, one of them.
    StrangeDayswatto_cobra

  • FCC retest vindicates Apple on iPhone RF exposure claims

    klink172klink172
    anton zuykov said:

    klink172 said:
    DAalseth said:
    MisterKit said:
    Maybe Apple would have a slander case against the newspaper. I would not take too kindly an article which was false and could lead to scarring my reputation and possibly resulting in lost income.
    Probably not against the newspaper. Freedom of speech and the press would likely quash that. But if someone brought the story to the paper’s attention I suppose Apple might be able to go after them. What I mean is if John Doe concocts the bogus tests for whatever reason (to get his name out as a researcher, to promote his lab, to lay groundwork for a suit against Apple, etc.,) and gives the story to the paper then he, rather than the paper, might be on the hook. But it would be hard to prove.
    The press has no freedom from slander. They never have. 
    In this case would be very hard to prove. For slander you need to show that they did that on purpose, rather than it just being "sloppy job" as one famous dude recently put it.
    That’s all fine and understood. But freedom of the press doesn’t protect the press from being sued for slander as the poster I was responding to insinuated. 
    watto_cobra

  • FCC retest vindicates Apple on iPhone RF exposure claims

    klink172klink172
    DAalseth said:
    MisterKit said:
    Maybe Apple would have a slander case against the newspaper. I would not take too kindly an article which was false and could lead to scarring my reputation and possibly resulting in lost income.
    Probably not against the newspaper. Freedom of speech and the press would likely quash that. But if someone brought the story to the paper’s attention I suppose Apple might be able to go after them. What I mean is if John Doe concocts the bogus tests for whatever reason (to get his name out as a researcher, to promote his lab, to lay groundwork for a suit against Apple, etc.,) and gives the story to the paper then he, rather than the paper, might be on the hook. But it would be hard to prove.
    The press has no freedom from slander. They never have. 
    watto_cobra