KITA

About

Username
KITA
Joined
Visits
127
Last Active
Roles
member
Points
1,479
Badges
0
Posts
410
  • Apple unveils new 13-inch MacBook Pro with Magic Keyboard

    jdb8167 said:

    KITA said:
    jdb8167 said:
     If these CPUs disappoint you, well you better hope for an ARM transition because Intel isn’t releasing anything better for a while.
    I'm not sure why people pretend that AMD doesn't exist and ARM is the only solution.

    AMD's 4800U is a 15W 8 core / 16 thread chip with excellent performance that easily beats out Intel's 25W 6 core / 12 thread 10710U.
    [graph removed]
    What laptops use a 25-28W (or lower if the performance is better) AMD mobile CPU? What is the battery life? I can’t find anything talking about battery life tests and the Ryzen 4000 series. I’m not saying they don’t exist but are they being used by companies like HP, Lenovo and Dell? Customers who need a large and reliable quantity of CPUs to create a flagship. A flagship AMD CPU in the 1.5-1.7 cm (0.60” - 0.67”)  thickness range and weighing about 1.4 kg (3 pounds) would be ideal as a comparison to the 13” MacBook Pro.

    AMD might get there but they are just starting out being competitive in the mobile space for the first time. That makes it hard for a company needing millions of CPUs per quarter to design for AMD.

    Edit: And I should mention that the Intel Core i7-10710U is a 14 nm part and only supports Intel UHD graphics which is not as strong as the Iris Plus. Not really a one to one comparison.
    15 W Ryzen 4000 series chips are just coming to market now from Lenovo, Acer, HP, etc.

    The benchmarks are from this Lenovo:



    Comparing the AMD and Intel versions of the same laptop:








    Slightly better battery life and far better performance from AMD.

    As well, the 10710U is a 6 core / 12 thread part. In terms of CPU performance, it can best Ice Lake for single core and multi core applications.
    jdb8167watto_cobra
  • Apple unveils new 13-inch MacBook Pro with Magic Keyboard

    tht said:
    KITA said:
    So I'll add one more thing to that.

    Noise level:

    MBP - 29 dB(A) idle / 33 dB(A) load mid / 41.8 dB(A) load max
    Razer - 30 dB(A) idle / 33.9 dB(A) load mid / 38.1 dB(A) load max

    So clearly it's possible to create a thin and light laptop with a dGPU. A lower power dGPU like the MX250 or MX350 could also be used.

    Customers of some gaming laptops should bear in mind that performance while plugged in and unplugged are different. It's not uncommon for a high performance dGPU in laptop to be restricted to 1/3rd its performance while unplugged. There's always a cost.
    That's not the case with the Razer's dGPU at all.

    Some benchmarks:

    Battlefield V (ultra)

    Plugged in - 40 fps
    Battery - 38 fps

    Overwatch (epic)

    Plugged in - 68 fps
    Battery - 65 fps

    Shadow of the Tomb Raider (highest)

    Plugged in - 33 fps
    Battery - 31 fps

    Again, a dGPU in a 13" laptop can be done without completely ruining the form factor. 
    avon b7digitol
  • Apple unveils new 13-inch MacBook Pro with Magic Keyboard

    neilm said:
    KITA said:
    Still no dGPU?

    Razer fit a GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4 GB into their 3 lbs laptop with a 25W Ice Lake i7 CPU. They also have the option for a 120 Hz or 4K display.

    As well, AMD's 4000U series (up to 8 cores and 16 threads at 15 W) is hitting the market with far better performance than this in both CPU and iGPU performance.

    Apple fixing their keyboard is nice, but this is a very weak update.
    The problem with a dGPU in a 13" laptop, where there's not much room for a big battery, is battery drain. The Razer you cite is optimized for gaming, which isn't Apple's thing. I can't find any claims for how long its battery lasts under load, but my guess is that its usage case calls for AC power to be connected for any kind of extended use with the dGPU active. I do see that the Razer calls for a 100W AC power supply, which seems...troubling.
    The laptop has an iGPU as well, if a user chooses to optimize for longer battery life when away from the plug, that's always an option (the same iGPU in the MBP). GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is the extreme case of what's possible, there have always been options for the MX250/MX350 for better than iGPU performance. "optimized for gaming" is a bit odd to say - a relatively powerful CUDA dGPU is excellent for all sorts of productivity applications outside of gaming.

    Of course, all of this is rather moot when a laptop with a 15W Ryzen 7 4800U will wipe the floor with even a 25W Ice Lake chip.

    mdriftmeyer
  • Apple unveils new 13-inch MacBook Pro with Magic Keyboard

    Still no dGPU?

    Razer fit a GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4 GB into their 3 lbs laptop with a 25W Ice Lake i7 CPU. They also have the option for a 120 Hz or 4K display.

    As well, AMD's 4000U series (up to 8 cores and 16 threads at 15 W) is hitting the market with far better performance than this in both CPU and iGPU performance.

    Apple fixing their keyboard is nice, but this is a very weak update.
    ITGUYINSDdonjuandysamoria
  • Portrait Mode on iPhone SE relies only on machine learning

    Instead, the entry-level iPhone produces depth maps entirely through machine learning. That also means that it can produce Portrait Mode photos from both its front- and rear-facing cameras. That's something undoubtedly made possible by the top-of-the-line A13 Bionic chipset underneath its hood.
    Is this any different from Google's single lens portrait mode (no split pixels either) that's able to run on even mid-range Snapdragon SoCs from years ago? I don't see why you would buff the A13 Bionic otherwise, seemingly older iPhones, such as the iPhone 8, should be able to process this one would presume.
    MplsPgatorguymuthuk_vanalingam